English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
| Local perceptions of the different land types and resources<br />
Table 16. Villagers’ perception on threats to <strong>for</strong>est and biodiversity (19 respondents)<br />
Threat to <strong>for</strong>ests and biodiversity<br />
Number of respondents<br />
perceiving threat<br />
Logging 17<br />
Forest fire 8<br />
Slash-and-burn agriculture 6<br />
War wreckage collection 6<br />
Hunting 4<br />
Extraction of <strong>for</strong>est products 3<br />
Firewood collection 1<br />
detectors and because it is difficult to use them on this kind of land, they clear the<br />
grass with fire. When this is done during the dry season, the danger is high <strong>for</strong> the<br />
fire to expand out of control.<br />
People think that hunting activities can harm the <strong>for</strong>est’s wildlife. Although<br />
hunting is <strong>for</strong>bidden, villagers often meet poachers in the <strong>for</strong>est looking <strong>for</strong><br />
endangered species (bear, tiger). The collection of firewood and other NTFPs is<br />
considered less harmful to the <strong>for</strong>est habitats.<br />
People’s knowledge and perception of the threats to <strong>for</strong>est and biodiversity<br />
are similar to those reported by Le Trong Trai et al. (2001), even if we found<br />
that the ranks attributed to those threats are quite different. For example, the Le<br />
Trong Trai et al. (2001) affirm that Khe Tran people perceive NTFP collection<br />
and timber cutting as the most pernicious ongoing threat to the <strong>for</strong>est, but our<br />
survey shows local people rank logging and <strong>for</strong>est fire as the most serious threats.<br />
To some extent, the discourses of local people may be influenced by the official<br />
vision and discourse on threats. Villagers try to follow the communal, district and<br />
provincial rules as much as possible and this ef<strong>for</strong>t may influence their perception<br />
of land management. We think that this behaviour helps villagers to emphasize the<br />
struggle <strong>for</strong> their rights over the lands around Khe Tran.<br />
These factors, according to villagers, in addition to the ‘open access’ to the<br />
<strong>for</strong>est <strong>for</strong> outsiders (because of limited FPD personnel to control access) have<br />
increased the threat to local biodiversity. Local people’s involvement in the<br />
management of the reserve could be a way to reduce some of the threats. During<br />
one of the meetings some villagers expressed their interest to become more directly<br />
involved in the management of the surrounding natural <strong>for</strong>est and they hoped that<br />
it might bring them some benefits, e.g. employment and even some timber <strong>for</strong><br />
their daily needs. If they were to become part of the nature reserve management,<br />
it could help achieve a win-win situation.<br />
6.8. People’s hopes <strong>for</strong> the future of their <strong>for</strong>est and life<br />
Villagers gave many answers to our questions on the future of their <strong>for</strong>est and life<br />
during personal interviews. Their aspirations are presented in Tables 17 and 18 .<br />
The main answer given by villagers asked what they would do if the <strong>for</strong>est<br />
degraded or disappeared is to re<strong>for</strong>est the area. They think they will always