05.03.2013 Views

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| Local perceptions of the different land types and resources<br />

Table 16. Villagers’ perception on threats to <strong>for</strong>est and biodiversity (19 respondents)<br />

Threat to <strong>for</strong>ests and biodiversity<br />

Number of respondents<br />

perceiving threat<br />

Logging 17<br />

Forest fire 8<br />

Slash-and-burn agriculture 6<br />

War wreckage collection 6<br />

Hunting 4<br />

Extraction of <strong>for</strong>est products 3<br />

Firewood collection 1<br />

detectors and because it is difficult to use them on this kind of land, they clear the<br />

grass with fire. When this is done during the dry season, the danger is high <strong>for</strong> the<br />

fire to expand out of control.<br />

People think that hunting activities can harm the <strong>for</strong>est’s wildlife. Although<br />

hunting is <strong>for</strong>bidden, villagers often meet poachers in the <strong>for</strong>est looking <strong>for</strong><br />

endangered species (bear, tiger). The collection of firewood and other NTFPs is<br />

considered less harmful to the <strong>for</strong>est habitats.<br />

People’s knowledge and perception of the threats to <strong>for</strong>est and biodiversity<br />

are similar to those reported by Le Trong Trai et al. (2001), even if we found<br />

that the ranks attributed to those threats are quite different. For example, the Le<br />

Trong Trai et al. (2001) affirm that Khe Tran people perceive NTFP collection<br />

and timber cutting as the most pernicious ongoing threat to the <strong>for</strong>est, but our<br />

survey shows local people rank logging and <strong>for</strong>est fire as the most serious threats.<br />

To some extent, the discourses of local people may be influenced by the official<br />

vision and discourse on threats. Villagers try to follow the communal, district and<br />

provincial rules as much as possible and this ef<strong>for</strong>t may influence their perception<br />

of land management. We think that this behaviour helps villagers to emphasize the<br />

struggle <strong>for</strong> their rights over the lands around Khe Tran.<br />

These factors, according to villagers, in addition to the ‘open access’ to the<br />

<strong>for</strong>est <strong>for</strong> outsiders (because of limited FPD personnel to control access) have<br />

increased the threat to local biodiversity. Local people’s involvement in the<br />

management of the reserve could be a way to reduce some of the threats. During<br />

one of the meetings some villagers expressed their interest to become more directly<br />

involved in the management of the surrounding natural <strong>for</strong>est and they hoped that<br />

it might bring them some benefits, e.g. employment and even some timber <strong>for</strong><br />

their daily needs. If they were to become part of the nature reserve management,<br />

it could help achieve a win-win situation.<br />

6.8. People’s hopes <strong>for</strong> the future of their <strong>for</strong>est and life<br />

Villagers gave many answers to our questions on the future of their <strong>for</strong>est and life<br />

during personal interviews. Their aspirations are presented in Tables 17 and 18 .<br />

The main answer given by villagers asked what they would do if the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

degraded or disappeared is to re<strong>for</strong>est the area. They think they will always

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!