05.03.2013 Views

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| Conclusion and recommendations<br />

Among the eight main land covers, <strong>for</strong>ests are divided into three categories:<br />

big tree <strong>for</strong>ests, small tree <strong>for</strong>ests and plantations. The fact that villagers include<br />

plantations in the <strong>for</strong>est category seems related to the official <strong>for</strong>est status<br />

of plantation lands. Species richness is high in Khe Tran and even potentially<br />

monotonous land cover types such as plantations or rice fields still have high nontree<br />

diversity, which enables and maintains their multiuse function. Villagers still<br />

use a wide range of species <strong>for</strong> their livelihoods, partly from the natural <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

but, under present conditions, mainly from the cultivated areas.<br />

Participatory mapping also showed that knowledge on <strong>for</strong>est products,<br />

wildlife and other natural resources is still important <strong>for</strong> villagers, even if this<br />

knowledge tends to be limited in diversity of resources and in area covered. Apart<br />

from this ethno-botanical knowledge, we found that villagers also have a strong<br />

sense of ownership when they discuss land tenure in the village, repartition of<br />

plantation responsibilities and expectations <strong>for</strong> the future. Local people represent<br />

no imminent threat to the recorded endangered species. The direct impact of human<br />

activities on <strong>for</strong>est cover at present cannot be quantified based on our sampling.<br />

Forest, including natural <strong>for</strong>est and plantations, is the most important<br />

landscape element <strong>for</strong> all the villagers <strong>for</strong> all the products that can be collected<br />

from it. Perceptions of <strong>for</strong>est types vary by gender and according to accessibility<br />

and activities per<strong>for</strong>med. For men, plantation is the most important category<br />

because of the economic benefits, while <strong>for</strong> women it is natural <strong>for</strong>est because of<br />

the diversity of NTFPs encountered.<br />

With respect to different time frames, <strong>for</strong>est in the present (including<br />

plantations) is the least important, because of the actual resources depletion, the<br />

government ban on all natural resource collection in the <strong>for</strong>est and the actual<br />

alternative activities. Forest of the past is considered more important, because of<br />

all the activities that were possible then. Domesticated resources are considered<br />

more important than any other category, wild or purchased. The government<br />

policy on the PDNR has affected dependency on <strong>for</strong>est resources.<br />

Even if the knowledge on natural resources is still important considering<br />

the new management activities, we observe that the knowledge on <strong>for</strong>est is<br />

progressively decreasing. Local people still recognize the different roles of the<br />

<strong>for</strong>est in general, but have difficulty to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on specific resources.<br />

A big contribution to conservation could be realized by integrating the local<br />

point of view into it and by preserving the local knowledge. The main threat<br />

identified by villagers is logging, followed by <strong>for</strong>est fires. This ranking shows<br />

that there is awareness of the risks <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est, but also <strong>for</strong> local livelihoods, of<br />

engaging in unsustainable activities.<br />

The villagers explained that they would like to be part of the conservation<br />

process, <strong>for</strong> various reasons: to get access to the resources, to enhance their rights<br />

to the land, to get payment <strong>for</strong> the activities they would per<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the FPD. They<br />

expect also to be able to negotiate the use of some of the resources, mainly NTFPs,<br />

but logging as well. They want to collaborate with conservation institutions, not<br />

only <strong>for</strong> the reasons mentioned above, but also to keep the <strong>for</strong>est as a safety net<br />

<strong>for</strong> the future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!