English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
| Conclusion and recommendations<br />
Among the eight main land covers, <strong>for</strong>ests are divided into three categories:<br />
big tree <strong>for</strong>ests, small tree <strong>for</strong>ests and plantations. The fact that villagers include<br />
plantations in the <strong>for</strong>est category seems related to the official <strong>for</strong>est status<br />
of plantation lands. Species richness is high in Khe Tran and even potentially<br />
monotonous land cover types such as plantations or rice fields still have high nontree<br />
diversity, which enables and maintains their multiuse function. Villagers still<br />
use a wide range of species <strong>for</strong> their livelihoods, partly from the natural <strong>for</strong>ests<br />
but, under present conditions, mainly from the cultivated areas.<br />
Participatory mapping also showed that knowledge on <strong>for</strong>est products,<br />
wildlife and other natural resources is still important <strong>for</strong> villagers, even if this<br />
knowledge tends to be limited in diversity of resources and in area covered. Apart<br />
from this ethno-botanical knowledge, we found that villagers also have a strong<br />
sense of ownership when they discuss land tenure in the village, repartition of<br />
plantation responsibilities and expectations <strong>for</strong> the future. Local people represent<br />
no imminent threat to the recorded endangered species. The direct impact of human<br />
activities on <strong>for</strong>est cover at present cannot be quantified based on our sampling.<br />
Forest, including natural <strong>for</strong>est and plantations, is the most important<br />
landscape element <strong>for</strong> all the villagers <strong>for</strong> all the products that can be collected<br />
from it. Perceptions of <strong>for</strong>est types vary by gender and according to accessibility<br />
and activities per<strong>for</strong>med. For men, plantation is the most important category<br />
because of the economic benefits, while <strong>for</strong> women it is natural <strong>for</strong>est because of<br />
the diversity of NTFPs encountered.<br />
With respect to different time frames, <strong>for</strong>est in the present (including<br />
plantations) is the least important, because of the actual resources depletion, the<br />
government ban on all natural resource collection in the <strong>for</strong>est and the actual<br />
alternative activities. Forest of the past is considered more important, because of<br />
all the activities that were possible then. Domesticated resources are considered<br />
more important than any other category, wild or purchased. The government<br />
policy on the PDNR has affected dependency on <strong>for</strong>est resources.<br />
Even if the knowledge on natural resources is still important considering<br />
the new management activities, we observe that the knowledge on <strong>for</strong>est is<br />
progressively decreasing. Local people still recognize the different roles of the<br />
<strong>for</strong>est in general, but have difficulty to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on specific resources.<br />
A big contribution to conservation could be realized by integrating the local<br />
point of view into it and by preserving the local knowledge. The main threat<br />
identified by villagers is logging, followed by <strong>for</strong>est fires. This ranking shows<br />
that there is awareness of the risks <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>est, but also <strong>for</strong> local livelihoods, of<br />
engaging in unsustainable activities.<br />
The villagers explained that they would like to be part of the conservation<br />
process, <strong>for</strong> various reasons: to get access to the resources, to enhance their rights<br />
to the land, to get payment <strong>for</strong> the activities they would per<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the FPD. They<br />
expect also to be able to negotiate the use of some of the resources, mainly NTFPs,<br />
but logging as well. They want to collaborate with conservation institutions, not<br />
only <strong>for</strong> the reasons mentioned above, but also to keep the <strong>for</strong>est as a safety net<br />
<strong>for</strong> the future.