English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 20. Plant richness in Khe Tran<br />
Land type Plot Tree<br />
richness*<br />
Number<br />
of tree<br />
individuals<br />
recorded<br />
Biodiversity and Local Perceptions |<br />
Number<br />
of tree<br />
species<br />
Mean<br />
number<br />
of tree<br />
species<br />
Number<br />
of nontree<br />
species<br />
Mean<br />
number<br />
of nontree<br />
species<br />
Garden<br />
4<br />
6<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
16<br />
12<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
46<br />
27<br />
37<br />
Plantation<br />
<strong>for</strong>est<br />
1<br />
5<br />
0.00<br />
0.30<br />
40<br />
40<br />
1<br />
3<br />
2<br />
25<br />
39<br />
33<br />
Primary<br />
<strong>for</strong>est<br />
7 0.91 40 29 29 33 33<br />
Rice field 10 n.a. 0 0 0 31 31<br />
Secondary<br />
<strong>for</strong>est<br />
3<br />
9<br />
11<br />
0.87<br />
0.92<br />
0.81<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
25<br />
30<br />
20<br />
25<br />
36<br />
51<br />
36<br />
41<br />
Shrub<br />
land<br />
2<br />
8<br />
n.a.<br />
n.a.<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
30<br />
24<br />
27<br />
*Tree richness = log sp/log count<br />
10 10<br />
n.a. means not applicable<br />
7.4. Forest structure<br />
Richness of life <strong>for</strong>ms of non-tree species varied substantially among land types.<br />
Epiphytes were present in only one secondary <strong>for</strong>est plot. Herbs, with 190 species,<br />
were the richest non-tree life <strong>for</strong>m category in all land types, especially in more<br />
open and managed areas such as dry rice fields and gardens. Lianas, climbers and<br />
ferns were also present in all of the land types, except rice fields (Table 22).<br />
Secondary <strong>for</strong>ests had the highest canopy, highest dbh and second lowest<br />
furcation index, as illustrated in Figure 19 on the right. Mean height of the<br />
secondary <strong>for</strong>est varied from 10 to 17 m with a maximum of two canopy layers,<br />
which indicates the lack of high primary <strong>for</strong>est species. Mean height of the primary<br />
<strong>for</strong>est was 14 m, which is in line with other survey results from this area (e.g. Le<br />
Trong Trai et al. 2001). Canopy height in plantation <strong>for</strong>est varied between 14 and<br />
16 m and in gardens from 6 to 10 m.<br />
Furcation index indicates the plant height where apical dominance is no<br />
longer a property of a single defined stem. It was recorded on a continuous scale<br />
from 0 to 110% (the latter being a tree trunk without clear dominant stem). Some<br />
structural features of trees may be linked to their disturbance history and MLA<br />
experiences from, <strong>for</strong> example, Papua and Kalimantan show that apical dominance<br />
is generally low in primary rain<strong>for</strong>ests with closed canopy. An increase of value<br />
may reflect the rate of disturbance in the <strong>for</strong>ests (trees resprout after breakage) and<br />
history of utilization of trees. As presented in Figure 19, on the right, furcation<br />
index values in Khe Tran varied from 30 to 63. The highest value was recorded<br />
in rubber plantation and the lowest ones in the most distant secondary <strong>for</strong>est plots<br />
and Acacia plantation without intensive management.