05.03.2013 Views

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 20. Plant richness in Khe Tran<br />

Land type Plot Tree<br />

richness*<br />

Number<br />

of tree<br />

individuals<br />

recorded<br />

Biodiversity and Local Perceptions |<br />

Number<br />

of tree<br />

species<br />

Mean<br />

number<br />

of tree<br />

species<br />

Number<br />

of nontree<br />

species<br />

Mean<br />

number<br />

of nontree<br />

species<br />

Garden<br />

4<br />

6<br />

0.25<br />

0.00<br />

16<br />

12<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

46<br />

27<br />

37<br />

Plantation<br />

<strong>for</strong>est<br />

1<br />

5<br />

0.00<br />

0.30<br />

40<br />

40<br />

1<br />

3<br />

2<br />

25<br />

39<br />

33<br />

Primary<br />

<strong>for</strong>est<br />

7 0.91 40 29 29 33 33<br />

Rice field 10 n.a. 0 0 0 31 31<br />

Secondary<br />

<strong>for</strong>est<br />

3<br />

9<br />

11<br />

0.87<br />

0.92<br />

0.81<br />

40<br />

40<br />

40<br />

25<br />

30<br />

20<br />

25<br />

36<br />

51<br />

36<br />

41<br />

Shrub<br />

land<br />

2<br />

8<br />

n.a.<br />

n.a.<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

30<br />

24<br />

27<br />

*Tree richness = log sp/log count<br />

10 10<br />

n.a. means not applicable<br />

7.4. Forest structure<br />

Richness of life <strong>for</strong>ms of non-tree species varied substantially among land types.<br />

Epiphytes were present in only one secondary <strong>for</strong>est plot. Herbs, with 190 species,<br />

were the richest non-tree life <strong>for</strong>m category in all land types, especially in more<br />

open and managed areas such as dry rice fields and gardens. Lianas, climbers and<br />

ferns were also present in all of the land types, except rice fields (Table 22).<br />

Secondary <strong>for</strong>ests had the highest canopy, highest dbh and second lowest<br />

furcation index, as illustrated in Figure 19 on the right. Mean height of the<br />

secondary <strong>for</strong>est varied from 10 to 17 m with a maximum of two canopy layers,<br />

which indicates the lack of high primary <strong>for</strong>est species. Mean height of the primary<br />

<strong>for</strong>est was 14 m, which is in line with other survey results from this area (e.g. Le<br />

Trong Trai et al. 2001). Canopy height in plantation <strong>for</strong>est varied between 14 and<br />

16 m and in gardens from 6 to 10 m.<br />

Furcation index indicates the plant height where apical dominance is no<br />

longer a property of a single defined stem. It was recorded on a continuous scale<br />

from 0 to 110% (the latter being a tree trunk without clear dominant stem). Some<br />

structural features of trees may be linked to their disturbance history and MLA<br />

experiences from, <strong>for</strong> example, Papua and Kalimantan show that apical dominance<br />

is generally low in primary rain<strong>for</strong>ests with closed canopy. An increase of value<br />

may reflect the rate of disturbance in the <strong>for</strong>ests (trees resprout after breakage) and<br />

history of utilization of trees. As presented in Figure 19, on the right, furcation<br />

index values in Khe Tran varied from 30 to 63. The highest value was recorded<br />

in rubber plantation and the lowest ones in the most distant secondary <strong>for</strong>est plots<br />

and Acacia plantation without intensive management.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!