07.03.2013 Views

Remembering the Socialist Past - Bad request! - University of Exeter

Remembering the Socialist Past - Bad request! - University of Exeter

Remembering the Socialist Past - Bad request! - University of Exeter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresentation <strong>of</strong> childhood. Naomi Sokol<strong>of</strong>f writes: ‘children in imaginative writing<br />

by <strong>the</strong>ir elders are by definition O<strong>the</strong>rs whose words must be translated into a<br />

world <strong>of</strong> mature discourse <strong>the</strong>y do not yet inhabit.’ 76 The need to ‘translate’<br />

children’s experiences into ‘mature discourse’ means childhood is always<br />

represented from a distance, never from within as <strong>the</strong> child him/herself really sees<br />

it. Sokol<strong>of</strong>f explains <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> this:<br />

48<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rness always impinges in some way on treatments <strong>of</strong> childhood in adult<br />

writing. No grown writer can speak au<strong>the</strong>ntically in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> childhood<br />

or in <strong>the</strong> voice <strong>of</strong> a child, for inevitably <strong>the</strong>re exist disparities between<br />

grown-up narration and <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> youthful characters. 77<br />

Gullestad also addresses this concern and draws a distinction between ‘textual<br />

childhoods’ and ‘lived childhoods’, thus highlighting <strong>the</strong> fact that literary depictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> children and childhood are represented as <strong>the</strong>y are remembered, imagined and<br />

observed by adults. 78 Depictions <strong>of</strong> children may also exploit or subvert our<br />

associations with childhood in order to communicate a variety <strong>of</strong> ideas about<br />

society in general. Even in autobiographies <strong>of</strong> childhood where <strong>the</strong> author really did<br />

experience <strong>the</strong> events narrated, <strong>the</strong> inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> childhood is masked by an<br />

acceptance or belief that because we remember our own childhoods we know what<br />

being a child feels like. Writing about childhood, even more than o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong><br />

autobiography, requires an imaginative leap by <strong>the</strong> reader. Childhood memories are<br />

likely to be fragmented and lacking in detail, yet many childhood memoirs <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

coherent narratives including, for example, substantial portions <strong>of</strong> dialogue which it<br />

would be virtually impossible to remember accurately. Paul John Eakin refers to<br />

popular autobiographical stories <strong>of</strong> childhood by Frank McCourt and Mary Karr as<br />

examples where readers accept a certain amount <strong>of</strong> ‘imaginative reconstruction’ as<br />

76 Naomi B. Sokol<strong>of</strong>f, Imagining <strong>the</strong> Child in Modern Jewish Fiction (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 1992), p. 3.<br />

77 Ibid.<br />

78 Gullestad, p. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!