20.03.2013 Views

Procedure for assessing the acceptability, in principle, of vaccines ...

Procedure for assessing the acceptability, in principle, of vaccines ...

Procedure for assessing the acceptability, in principle, of vaccines ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

o review and approval <strong>of</strong> variations/changes;<br />

o extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g regulatory oversight exercised <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest; and<br />

o will<strong>in</strong>gness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agency to collaborate with WHO <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation<br />

and ongo<strong>in</strong>g regulatory oversight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>in</strong>dicators have been developed and <strong>the</strong> NRA assessment tool<br />

is revised, thus allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> functionality levels, a stepwise<br />

expansion to <strong>in</strong>clude additional authorities can be carried out.<br />

4.2 Streaml<strong>in</strong>ed procedure <strong>for</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>es with market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

authorization/licens<strong>in</strong>g granted by eligible NRAs<br />

As an alternative to <strong>the</strong> WHO vacc<strong>in</strong>e prequalification procedure described <strong>in</strong> section<br />

3, <strong>the</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong>ed option can be applied to vacc<strong>in</strong>es that have been licensed by<br />

selected NRAs which are eligible and will<strong>in</strong>g to share regulatory <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation with<br />

WHO through a collaboration agreement.<br />

WHO will explicitly request <strong>the</strong> assistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRA responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulatory<br />

oversight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> candidate vacc<strong>in</strong>e, and will engage <strong>in</strong> discussions <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a <strong>for</strong>mal collaboration agreement that outl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> shared<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> roles, responsibilities and commitments <strong>of</strong> each party. Provisions <strong>for</strong><br />

confidentiality will be also <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> this agreement can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by both parties and could <strong>in</strong>clude one<br />

or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g (each subject to agreement by <strong>the</strong> manufacturer):<br />

− shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> NRA reports relevant to product quality, and noncl<strong>in</strong>ical and<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical evaluation;<br />

− shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> NRA/ NCL test results (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> raw data);<br />

− shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>spection reports.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!