20.03.2013 Views

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

o Market imperfections<br />

o Measuring WTP <strong>for</strong> non-marginal changes<br />

o Marshallian versus Hicksian demand<br />

Life Satisfaction Approach<br />

o <strong>Cost</strong>-effective<br />

o Reasonably wide application<br />

o Fewer survey-related biases<br />

o No market structure assumptions<br />

o Difficulties in estimating the marginal utility of income<br />

o Difficulties in estimating the marginal utility of the non-market good<br />

4.3.1 Stated Preference Methods<br />

Advantages<br />

i) Wide application and specific valuations<br />

Stated preference methods can, in principle, be used to value any specific non-market good.<br />

Choice modelling methods can also be used to estimate the value of the attributes of a nonmarket<br />

good. This can be useful if different policy options differ in the attribute levels that they<br />

provide (Mourato et al, 2005).<br />

ii) Allows one to explore the reasons behind preferences<br />

Stated preference questionnaires can include questions relating to:<br />

o the respondent‘s characteristics or attitudes toward the non-market good; and<br />

o the reasons behind the respondent‘s choices or answers to the WTP/WTA questions.<br />

Exploring the variation in responses is useful <strong>for</strong> identifying the winners and losers of an<br />

intervention. This is useful <strong>for</strong> stakeholder analysis (Bateman, 2002). It is also helpful that,<br />

through the development of a primary questionnaire, groups can be defined by characteristics<br />

which are typically unobserved on the conventional datasets used in revealed preference or life<br />

satisfaction studies.<br />

Uncovering the reasons behind respondents‘ answers can also be helpful. For example, in<br />

hedonic pricing studies, it is often identified that house prices increase with the air quality in<br />

their neighbourhood (Smith and Huang, 1995). The exact reason <strong>for</strong> this correlation is often not<br />

clear. For example, it could be due to lower cleaning bills, the neighbourhood being more<br />

aesthetically pleasing, or due to the health damages associated with polluted air (Portney,<br />

1981).<br />

iii) Ex-ante application<br />

The value of any specific policy or intervention can be estimated be<strong>for</strong>e it is actually<br />

implemented. There<strong>for</strong>e stated preference methods can aid decision-making at an early stage of<br />

the policy cycle. Other valuation methods can be used ex-ante however they rely on an implicit<br />

assumption that the preferences revealed in the past do not change in the future.<br />

iv) Widely used and researched<br />

There have been a large number of applied contingent valuation studies. Carson et al (1995)<br />

present a bibliography of over 2000 studies from more than 40 countries and Carson (2004)<br />

presents a bibliography that exceeds 5000. In addition to application, the reliability and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!