Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kahneman, D., A.B., K., D., S., Schwarz, N., Stone, A., 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. . Science 306, 1776-1780. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B.L., Schreiber, C.A., Redelmeier, D.A., 1993. When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End. Psychological Science 4, 401-405. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., 1992. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57-70. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., 2006. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well- Being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, 3-24. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I. 1994. Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 1, 5-37. Kahneman, D; Ritov, I; Schkade, D. 1999. Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 1-3, 203-235 Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Sunstein, C., 1998. Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 16, 49-86. Kahneman, D., Snell, J., 1992. Predicting a Changing Taste: Do People Know What They Will Like? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5, 187-200. Kahneman, D., Sugden, R., 2005. Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 32, 161-181. Kahneman, D., Thaler, R.H., 2006. Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, 221-234. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P.P., Sarin, R., 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 375-405. Kang, M., Rangel, A., Camus, M., Camerer, C.F., 2011. Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31: 461-468. Kaoru, Y. 1993. Differentiating Use and Nonuse Values for Coastal Pond Water Quality Improvements. Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 487-494. Kemp, M. and Maxwell, C. 2003. Exploring a Budget Context for Contingent Valuation Estimates. in Hausman, J.A. (Ed.) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (Contributions to Economic Analysis, Volume 220, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 217-269. Kenning P, Plassmann H., 2005. Neuroeconomics: an overview from an economic perspective. Brain Res Bull. 2005 Nov 15;67(5): 343-54. Krajbich, I., Camerer, C.F., Ledyard, J., Rangel, A., 2009. Using neural measures of economic value to solve the public goods free-rider problem. Science, 326: 596-599. Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., 2008. The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics 92, 1833-1845. 71
72 Krutilla, J. V. 1967. Conservation Reconsidered. American Economic Review 57, 777–786. Larson, D.M. 1993. On Measuring Existence Value. Land Economics 69, 4, 377-388 Layard, R., Mayarz, G., Nickell, S., 2008. The marginal utility of income. SOEP papers on multidisciplinary Panel Data Research. Leggett, C.G., Bockstael, N.E. 2000. Evidence of the Effects of Water Quality on Residential Land Prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 121-144. Levinson, A., 2009. Valuing Public Goods Using Happiness Data: The Case of Air Quality. Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21:153–174. Levy, I., Lazzaro, S., Rutlegg, R., Glimcher, P. 2011. Choice from Non-Choice: Predicting Consumer Preferences from Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signals Obtained during Passive Viewing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 31(1): 118-125. Lindahl, M., 2002. Estimating the Effect of Income on Health and Mortality Using Lottery Prizes as Exogenous Source of Variation in Income. IZA Discussion Paper 442. List, J., 2003. Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1. 41-71. List, J., Shrogen, J., 2002. Calibration of of Willingness-to-Accept. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 43. 219-233. Loewenstein, G., Adler, D., 1995. A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes. The Economic Journal 105, 929-937. Loewenstein, G., Schkade, D. 1999. Wouldn‘t it be nice: Predicting future feelings. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well being: The foundation of hedonic psychology, 85-108. New York: Russell Sage. Loomes, G. 2006. (How) Can we value health, safety and the environment? Journal of Economic Psychology 27, 713–736 Luechinger, S., 2009. Valuing Air Quality Using the Life Satisfaction Approach. Economic Journal 119, 482-515. Luechinger, S., Raschky, P.A., 2009. Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach. Journal of Public Economics 93, 620-633. Luttmer, E.F.P., 2005. Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 963-1002. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E., 2005. The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success? Psychological Bulletin 131, 803-855. MacKerron, G., Mourato, S., 2009. Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics 68, 1441-1453.
Page 1 and 2:
Valuation Techniques for Social Cos
Page 3 and 4:
Official versions of this document
Page 5 and 6:
Foreword The Government is committe
Page 7 and 8:
1 Introduction The Green Book refer
Page 9 and 10:
2 Background: Monetary Valuation Ec
Page 11 and 12:
3 Valuation Methods This chapter pr
Page 13 and 14:
The two most common revealed prefer
Page 15 and 16:
the MRS between income and the non-
Page 17 and 18: 18 discussion here is also relevant
Page 19 and 20: 20 Loomes (2006) reviews a number o
Page 21 and 22: 22 The theory of constructed prefer
Page 23 and 24: 24 learning and experience Bateman
Page 25 and 26: 26 life in general (Schwarz and Str
Page 27 and 28: 28 well-trained interviewers (Carso
Page 29 and 30: 30 make definitive statements regar
Page 31 and 32: 32 o Market imperfections o Measuri
Page 33 and 34: 34 See Blumenschein et al. (2008) f
Page 35 and 36: 36 The hedonic approach rests on th
Page 37 and 38: 38 As already discussed in section
Page 39 and 40: 40 illusion. Instead, respondents a
Page 41 and 42: 42 Data The British Household Panel
Page 43 and 44: 44 either Dolan et al.‘s (2011b)
Page 45 and 46: 46 Without a lagged model that acco
Page 47 and 48: 48 nearly twice the size of average
Page 49 and 50: 50 Here we discuss some of the inte
Page 51 and 52: 7 Conclusion This paper serves as a
Page 53 and 54: 56 from the knowledge that the poin
Page 55 and 56: 58 Regardless of the elicitation fo
Page 57 and 58: 60 market clears with each worker s
Page 59 and 60: 62 Single-site travel cost model ap
Page 61 and 62: 64 Luechinger (2009) Germany Air qu
Page 63 and 64: 66 Boyle, K. 2003. Contingent Valua
Page 65 and 66: 68 Dolan, P., Kahneman, D., 2008. I
Page 67: 70 Guria, J., Jones-Lee, M., Leung,
Page 71 and 72: 74 Powdthavee, N., 2008. Putting a
Page 73 and 74: 76 van den Berg, B., Ferrer-i-Carbo
show all

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?