Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Frey, B.S., Luechinger, S., Stutzer, A., 2004a. Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series 184. Frey, B.S., Luechinger, S., Stutzar, A., 2004b. Calculating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism CESIFO WORKING PAPER 1341. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A., 2004. Economic Consequences of Mispredicting Utility. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series 218. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A., 2005. Happiness research: State and prospoects. University of Zurich Working Paper. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J.P., Shields, M.A., 2004. Money Does Matter! Evidence from Increasing Real Income and Life Satisfaction in East Germany Following Reunification. The American Economic Review 94, 730-740. Gangl, M. 2010. Causal Inference in Sociological Research. Annual Review of Sociology. 36: 21– 47 Gardner, J., Oswald, A.J., 2007. Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of mediumsized lottery wins. Journal of Health Economics 26, 49-60. Gilbert, D., 2007. Stumbling on Happiness. Harper Perennial, London. Glimcher, P., Camerer, C.F., Feher, E., Poldrack, R.A., (ed.s) 2009. Neuroeconomics. Decision making and the brain. Elsevier: London. Grabenhorst et. al. 2010. A common neural scale for the subjective pleasantness of different primary rewards. NeuroImage 51. 1265–1274. Graham, C., Eggers, A., Sukhtankar, S., 2004. Does happiness pay?: An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55, 319-342. Graham, C., Felton, A., 2006. Inequality and Happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality 4, 107-122. Green, D., Jacowitz, G., Kahneman, D., McFadden, D. 1998. Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods. Resource and Energy Economics 20, 85- 116. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., 1993. Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 7, 177-197. Grether, D.M., Plott, C.R., 1979. Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. The American Economic Review 69, 623-638. Groot, W., van den Brink, H.M., Plug, E., 2004. Money for Health: the Equivalent Variation of Cardiovascular Diseases. Health Economics 13, 859-872. Groot, W., van den Brink, H.M., 2006. The compensating income variation of cardiovascular disease. Health Economics Letters 15, 1143-1148. Guria, J., Jones, W., Jones-Lee, M., Keall, M., Leung, J., & Loomes, G. 2003. The New Zealand values of statistical life and prevention of injuries. Draft Report to New Zealand Land Transport Safety Authority. 69
70 Guria, J., Jones-Lee, M., Leung, J., & Loomes, G. 2005. The willingness to accept value of statistical life relative to the willingness to pay value: Evidence and policy implications. Environmental and Resource Economics 32, 113–127. Hanemann, W. M. 1991. Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? The American Economic Review 81, 3, 635-647. Hanemann, W. 1994. Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 4, 19 -43. Hanley, N., Mourato, S., Wright, R. 2001. Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 3. Hare, T., Malmaud, J., Rangel, A., 2011. Focusing attention on the health aspects of food changes value signals in the vmPFC and improves dietary choice. Journal of Neuroscience, (forthcoming). Hare, T., Camerer, C.F., Knoepfle, D.T., O'Doherty, J.P., Rangel, A. 2010. Value computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 583-590. Hastie and Dawes (2010) Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, 2 nd edition. Sage: London. Helliwell, J.F., Huang, H., 2005. How's the job? Wellbeing and social capital in the workplace. NBER Working Paper Series. Holmes, T., Adamowicz, W. 2003. Attribute Based Methods., in: Champ, P., Boyle, K., Brown, T. (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Horowitz, J.K., McConnell, K.E. 2002. A Review of WTA/WTP Studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44, 3, 426-447. Hsee, C., 2000. Attribute evaluability and its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. Cambridge University Press. Irwin, J.R., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., McClelland, G.H., 1993. Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 6, 5-18. Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D. 1995. Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 1161-1166. Jones-Lee, M. W., Loomes, G., Philips, P,R. 1995. Valuing the Prevention of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: Contingent Valuation vs. Standard Gambles, Oxford Economic Papers 47, 676- 695. Kahneman, D., 2009. Remarks on Neuroeconomics., in: Glimcher, P., Camerer, C.F., Feher, E., Poldrack, R.A., (Eds.) Neuroeconomics. Decision making and the brain. Elsevier: London. Kahneman, D., 2000. Evaluation by moments: Past and future., in: Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kahneman, D., 2000. New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption., in: Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kahneman D., Frederick S. 2007. Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies . Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 45-46.
Page 1 and 2:
Valuation Techniques for Social Cos
Page 3 and 4:
Official versions of this document
Page 5 and 6:
Foreword The Government is committe
Page 7 and 8:
1 Introduction The Green Book refer
Page 9 and 10:
2 Background: Monetary Valuation Ec
Page 11 and 12:
3 Valuation Methods This chapter pr
Page 13 and 14:
The two most common revealed prefer
Page 15 and 16: the MRS between income and the non-
Page 17 and 18: 18 discussion here is also relevant
Page 19 and 20: 20 Loomes (2006) reviews a number o
Page 21 and 22: 22 The theory of constructed prefer
Page 23 and 24: 24 learning and experience Bateman
Page 25 and 26: 26 life in general (Schwarz and Str
Page 27 and 28: 28 well-trained interviewers (Carso
Page 29 and 30: 30 make definitive statements regar
Page 31 and 32: 32 o Market imperfections o Measuri
Page 33 and 34: 34 See Blumenschein et al. (2008) f
Page 35 and 36: 36 The hedonic approach rests on th
Page 37 and 38: 38 As already discussed in section
Page 39 and 40: 40 illusion. Instead, respondents a
Page 41 and 42: 42 Data The British Household Panel
Page 43 and 44: 44 either Dolan et al.‘s (2011b)
Page 45 and 46: 46 Without a lagged model that acco
Page 47 and 48: 48 nearly twice the size of average
Page 49 and 50: 50 Here we discuss some of the inte
Page 51 and 52: 7 Conclusion This paper serves as a
Page 53 and 54: 56 from the knowledge that the poin
Page 55 and 56: 58 Regardless of the elicitation fo
Page 57 and 58: 60 market clears with each worker s
Page 59 and 60: 62 Single-site travel cost model ap
Page 61 and 62: 64 Luechinger (2009) Germany Air qu
Page 63 and 64: 66 Boyle, K. 2003. Contingent Valua
Page 65: 68 Dolan, P., Kahneman, D., 2008. I
Page 69 and 70: 72 Krutilla, J. V. 1967. Conservati
Page 71 and 72: 74 Powdthavee, N., 2008. Putting a
Page 73 and 74: 76 van den Berg, B., Ferrer-i-Carbo
show all

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?