Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Accent, 2010. Review of Stated Preference and WIllingness to Pay Methods. (Prepared for the Competition Commission). Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., 2005. How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 56, 405- 421. Amir, O., Ariely, D., Carmon, Z., 2008. The Dissociation Between Monetary Assessment and Predicted Utility. Marketing Science 27, 1055–1064. Ariely, D., 2009. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. Harper Collins. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., 2003. "Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 73-105. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., 2006. Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60, 1-10. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. NOAA Publication. Bateman, I., Burgess, D., Hutchinson, W.G., Matthews, D., 2006. Preference Learning versus Coherent Arbitrariness: NOAA Guidelines or a Learning Design Contingent Valuation. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 06-18. Bateman, I., Carson, R., Day, B., Hanemann, N., Hett, T., Hanley, N., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Beattie, J., Covey, J., Dolan, P., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G. 1998. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 1 – Caveat investigator. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17, 5–25. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S., 2001. Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data. The American Economic Review 91, 67-72. Black, D., Galdo, J., Liu, L. 2003. How Robust Are Hedonic Wage Estimates of the Price of Risk? Final Report to the USEPA Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A.J., 2004. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88, 1359-1386. Blumenschein, K., Blomquist, G.C., Johannesson, M., Horn, N., Freeman, P., 2008. Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment*. The Economic Journal 118, 114-137. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., Weimer, D. 2005. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Pearson Education. 3rd Revised edition. Bossaerts, P. Preuschoff, K., Hsu, M. 2009. The Neurobiological Foundations of Valuation in Human Decision Making Under Uncertainty., in: Glimcher, P., Camerer, C.F., Feher, E., Poldrack, R.A., (Eds.) Neuroeconomics. Decision making and the brain. Elsevier: London. 65
66 Boyle, K. 2003. Contingent Valuation in Practice, in: Champ, P., Boyle, K., Brown, T. (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Braeutigam, S. 2005. Neuroeconomics--from neural systems to economic behaviour. Brain Res Bull. 2005 Nov 15;67(5):355-60. Braga, J., Starmer, C., 2005. Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics 32, 55-89. Brown, T.C., 1984. The Concept of Value in Resource Allocation. Land Economics 60, 231-246. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., Bach, D., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C., 2010. How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology 20, 1165–1170. Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 9-64. Carlsson, F. 2010. Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? Environmental and Resource Economics 46:167–177 Carr, L., Mendelsohn, R. 2003. Valuing Coral Reefs: A Travel Cost Analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio 32, 5, 353-357. Carroll, N., Frijters, P., Shields, M., 2009. Quantifying the costs of drought: new evidence from life satisfaction data. Journal of Population Economics 22, 445-461. Carson, R.T., Wright, J., Alberini, A., Carson, N., Flores, N.E. 1995. A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers. LaJolla (California): Natural Resource Damage Assessment Inc. Carson, R., Flores, N., Martin, K., Wright, J. 1996. Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods. Land Economics 72, 1, 80-99. Carson, R. 2000. Contingent Valuation: A User‘s Guide. Environmental science & Technology 34, 1413-1418. Carson, R.T. 2004. Contingent Valuation. A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Edward Elgar. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E., Meade, N.F., 2001. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19, 173-210. Carson, R.T., Mitchell, R.C. 1993. The Issue of Scope in Contingent Valution Studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 5, Proceedings Issue, 1263-1267. CASE 2010. Understanding the drivers, impact and value of engagement in culture and sport: An over-arching summary of the research Champ, P. 2003. Survey Data for Nonmarket Valuation, in: Champ, P., Boyle, K., Brown, T. (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Chay, K., Greenstone, M. 2005. Does Air Quality Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market. Journal of Political Economy 113, 2. Chevalier, A., Lydon, R., 2002. Estimates of the Effect of Wages on Job Satisfaction. CEP Discussion Paper 531.
Page 1 and 2:
Valuation Techniques for Social Cos
Page 3 and 4:
Official versions of this document
Page 5 and 6:
Foreword The Government is committe
Page 7 and 8:
1 Introduction The Green Book refer
Page 9 and 10:
2 Background: Monetary Valuation Ec
Page 11 and 12: 3 Valuation Methods This chapter pr
Page 13 and 14: The two most common revealed prefer
Page 15 and 16: the MRS between income and the non-
Page 17 and 18: 18 discussion here is also relevant
Page 19 and 20: 20 Loomes (2006) reviews a number o
Page 21 and 22: 22 The theory of constructed prefer
Page 23 and 24: 24 learning and experience Bateman
Page 25 and 26: 26 life in general (Schwarz and Str
Page 27 and 28: 28 well-trained interviewers (Carso
Page 29 and 30: 30 make definitive statements regar
Page 31 and 32: 32 o Market imperfections o Measuri
Page 33 and 34: 34 See Blumenschein et al. (2008) f
Page 35 and 36: 36 The hedonic approach rests on th
Page 37 and 38: 38 As already discussed in section
Page 39 and 40: 40 illusion. Instead, respondents a
Page 41 and 42: 42 Data The British Household Panel
Page 43 and 44: 44 either Dolan et al.‘s (2011b)
Page 45 and 46: 46 Without a lagged model that acco
Page 47 and 48: 48 nearly twice the size of average
Page 49 and 50: 50 Here we discuss some of the inte
Page 51 and 52: 7 Conclusion This paper serves as a
Page 53 and 54: 56 from the knowledge that the poin
Page 55 and 56: 58 Regardless of the elicitation fo
Page 57 and 58: 60 market clears with each worker s
Page 59 and 60: 62 Single-site travel cost model ap
Page 61: 64 Luechinger (2009) Germany Air qu
Page 65 and 66: 68 Dolan, P., Kahneman, D., 2008. I
Page 67 and 68: 70 Guria, J., Jones-Lee, M., Leung,
Page 69 and 70: 72 Krutilla, J. V. 1967. Conservati
Page 71 and 72: 74 Powdthavee, N., 2008. Putting a
Page 73 and 74: 76 van den Berg, B., Ferrer-i-Carbo
show all

Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: - HM Treasury

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?