Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24-hour Dementia Care - Nivel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

and first author (N; sex; age) severity dementia) Reality Orientation, Hanley et al., 1981 Reality Orientation, Baldelli et al., 1993 -table 2.5 continued IV- Treatment type and first author Low RCT N (completers)=57 Hospital residents of long-stay psychogeriatric unit (n=41) Residents old peoples home (n=16) Female n=53 Male n=4 Low CCT N (baseline)=23 Female n=23 Male n=0 Age M=84.5 SD=6.4 Quality Design Participants (N; sex; age) Senile dementia n=39 Arteriosclerotic dementia or Cerebral arteriosclerosis n=9 Alcohol related dementia n=2 Korsakoff n=1 No diagnosis n=6 Severity of dementia (Koskela test) Hospital residents psychogeriatric unit Mild=7% Moderate=27% Grave=25% Nursing home residents Mild=20% Moderate= 55% Grave=25% Senile Alzheimer’s Disease n=23 MMSE 10 and 24 Participants (Type and severity dementia) Apathy: Geriatric Rating Scale (GRS)_Subscale withdrawn/apathy Depression: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Outcome measures Results 1) Apathy: No significant changes Depression: No significant changes
Reality Orientation, Ferrario et al., 1991 Multi-Sensory Stimulation/ Snoezelen Baker et al., 2001 Low CCT N (completers)=19 Female n=11 Male n=8 High RCT N (baseline) =50 Female n=25 Male n=25 Age M=78 (60) MMSE >18 and
Page 1 and 2: Dit proefschrift is een uitgave van
Page 3 and 4: Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24-hou
Page 5: niet naakt maar ontbloot het ontgli
Page 8 and 9: 8 Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24-h
Page 10 and 11: Introduction The study described in
Page 12 and 13: equire special services such as the
Page 14 and 15: the biomedical nature of dementia a
Page 16 and 17: Holtkamp et al., 1997; Kragt et al.
Page 18 and 19: Figure 1.1 Research model ‘reside
Page 20 and 21: a decrease of negative instrumental
Page 22 and 23: measurements on the experimental an
Page 24 and 25: Figure 1.3 Design of the study Mont
Page 26 and 27: Chapter 2 to 7 are submitted for pu
Page 28 and 29: 2 A systematic review The effects o
Page 30 and 31: International Psychogeriatric Assoc
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.1 Included methods Behaviou
Page 34 and 35: Table 2.2 Criteria List for the Met
Page 36 and 37: The Best Evidence Synthesis is cond
Page 38 and 39: This section describes the features
Page 40 and 41: Treatment type and first author Val
Page 44 and 45: -table 2.5 continued V- Treatment t
Page 46 and 47: Treatment type and first author Psy
Page 48 and 49: The second control group continued
Page 50 and 51: the day hospital, an occupational t
Page 52 and 53: One included study researched the e
Page 54 and 55: There is limited scientific evidenc
Page 56 and 57: Another point related to the focus
Page 58 and 59: Abstract Many intervention studies
Page 60 and 61: characteristics of the programme (i
Page 62 and 63: implementation process and the resu
Page 64 and 65: Study group On the last day of trai
Page 66 and 67: Questionnaire In order to identify
Page 68 and 69: Table 3.1 Caregivers’ opinion abo
Page 70 and 71: Nursing home (H) Facilitating facto
Page 72 and 73: In four homes, the study group had
Page 74 and 75: ‘An obstacle was formed by centra
Page 76 and 77: patient outcomes. There were two pr
Page 78 and 79: interventions in the organisational
Page 80 and 81: centred work environments’, as de
Page 82 and 83: 4 Effects of snoezelen, integrated
Page 84 and 85: Introduction Effective communicatio
Page 86 and 87: The following research questions wi
Page 88 and 89: Subjects Residents To establish the
Page 90 and 91: CNAs was employed in the ward at pr
Page 92 and 93:
Table 4.1 Nonverbal categories of t
Page 94 and 95:
-table 4.2 continued Instrumental c
Page 96 and 97:
the mean frequency of ‘smiling’
Page 98 and 99:
Follow-up Allocation Enrollment Ana
Page 100 and 101:
The table shows that the experiment
Page 102 and 103:
Table 4.5 Change in nonverbal commu
Page 104 and 105:
Table 4.6 Change in verbal communic
Page 106 and 107:
Table 4.7 Change in verbal communic
Page 108 and 109:
Conclusion and discussion Results T
Page 110 and 111:
Strengths and limitations The findi
Page 112 and 113:
communication despite demented resi
Page 114 and 115:
Abstract Background. Caregivers in
Page 116 and 117:
Background The intervention (implem
Page 118 and 119:
In particular, it was hypothesized
Page 120 and 121:
In the pre-test, 124 video-recordin
Page 122 and 123:
Enabling Giving the resident the op
Page 124 and 125:
Pearson correlation of 25 (10%) vid
Page 126 and 127:
change scores indicate a change in
Page 128 and 129:
- table 5.2 continued - Outcome mea
Page 130 and 131:
they were considered particularly i
Page 132 and 133:
dementia, which can be used by staf
Page 134 and 135:
138 Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24
Page 136 and 137:
Abstract Objectives: To investigate
Page 138 and 139:
2002; Sambandham and Schirm, 1995).
Page 140 and 141:
Randomization took place at ward le
Page 142 and 143:
eak) (Van Weert et al., 2004). Inte
Page 144 and 145:
The caregivers were offered three i
Page 146 and 147:
internal consistency (Cronbach’s
Page 148 and 149:
The number of wards was too small t
Page 150:
Background characteristics Table 6.
Page 153 and 154:
* p< .05, ** p< .01 a The scores in
Page 155 and 156:
- table 6.3 continued - Outcome mea
Page 157 and 158:
al., 2002). The within-session impr
Page 159 and 160:
Effects on resident's behaviour 163
Page 161 and 162:
Abstract Background: Dementia among
Page 163 and 164:
new model, reflecting the relations
Page 165 and 166:
considerations (e.g., the presence
Page 167 and 168:
working life. Outcome measures ‘Q
Page 169 and 170:
value calculated from the valid ite
Page 171 and 172:
Enrollment Allocation Follow-up Ana
Page 173 and 174:
The table shows that the experiment
Page 175 and 176:
Psychological outcomes The effects
Page 177 and 178:
Table 7.4 Change in outcome measure
Page 179 and 180:
Table 7.4 provides the adjusted est
Page 181 and 182:
model takes into account the data o
Page 183 and 184:
8 Summary and discussion Summary an
Page 185 and 186:
analysis, which implied more power
Page 187 and 188:
informal reciprocal consultation wa
Page 189 and 190:
To study the adherence of CNAs to t
Page 191 and 192:
Discussion Theoretical reflections
Page 193 and 194:
The effects of improved quality of
Page 195 and 196:
The results of the present study gi
Page 197 and 198:
direction. Qualitative as well as q
Page 199 and 200:
Schrijnemaekers, 2001; 2002). They
Page 201 and 202:
This study helped to answer relevan
Page 203 and 204:
The practical and complex methodolo
Page 205 and 206:
expected. In the experimental group
Page 207 and 208:
observation scale that included pos
Page 209 and 210:
Stimulus preference screening and c
Page 211 and 212:
Samenvatting In dit proefschrift wo
Page 213 and 214:
Om de effecten van snoezelen op de
Page 215 and 216:
van gewoontes. De follow-up bijeenk
Page 217 and 218:
tijdsinvestering gedaan wordt op zo
Page 219 and 220:
In hoofdstuk 7 zijn de effecten van
Page 221 and 222:
ewonersgerichte houding van verzorg
Page 223 and 224:
Samenvatting 233
Page 225 and 226:
Ballard C, O’Brien J, James I, My
Page 227 and 228:
Burns A. Psychotherapy in Alzheimer
Page 229 and 230:
versus usual care to demented elder
Page 231 and 232:
Grol RTPM, van Everdingen JJE, Casp
Page 233 and 234:
observatiekliniek voor ouderen [Val
Page 235 and 236:
Landeweerd JA, Boumans NPG, Nissen
Page 237 and 238:
Ribbe MW, Ljunggren G, Steel K, Top
Page 239 and 240:
Schrijnemaekers VJJ, Rossum E van,
Page 241 and 242:
Volicer L, Camberg L, Hurley AC, As
Page 243 and 244:
254 Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24
Page 245 and 246:
Definitions for verbal communicatio
Page 247 and 248:
Definitions for ‘Positive Person
Page 249 and 250:
Definitions for behaviour/mood item
Page 251 and 252:
Item Definition Wandering / restles
Page 253 and 254:
Appendix 2 Gedragsobservatielijst I
Page 255 and 256:
CODE B2-6- B VK 0=nee / 1=ja CODE B
Page 257 and 258:
Zorg Afhankelijkheids Schaal voor d
Page 259 and 260:
12 Reageert zichtbaar op muziek noo
Page 261 and 262:
50 Schuift met de voeten heen en we
Page 263 and 264:
AGITATIE (CMAI-D) De volgende 29 vr
Page 266 and 267:
DEPRESSIE (CSDD-D) Hierna volgen ee
Page 268 and 269:
2. Incontinentie De mate waarin de
Page 270 and 271:
9. Vermijden van gevaar De mate waa
Page 272 and 273:
Tot slot Wilt u a.u.b. controleren
Page 274 and 275:
284 Multi Sensory Stimulation in 24
Page 278 and 279:
1) TOELICHTING Met behulp van deze
Page 280 and 281:
1 wisselend ga door naar vraag 10
Page 282 and 283:
Heeft u in uw werk voldoende afwiss
Page 284 and 285:
C. OMGANG DOOR VERZORGENDEN MET DEM
Page 286 and 287:
22 ik krijg van de demente bewoners
Page 289 and 290:
D. PROBLEMEN VAN VERZORGENDEN MET H
Page 291 and 292:
schreeuwen) 1 2 3 4 5 8 29 depressi
Page 293:
geen weinig niet weinig veel heel v
Page 296 and 297:
13 de mate waarin u het gevoel hebt
Page 298 and 299:
zien? 6. Voelde u zich de laatste B
Page 300 and 301:
Eventuele aanvullende op- en aanmer
Page 302 and 303:
Dankwoord Dankwoord 305
Page 304 and 305:
“En nu de zon nog….!”, zei ee
Page 306 and 307:
Curriculum Vitae Curriculum Vitae 3
Page 308 and 309:
Julia van Weert werd op 1 november
show all

Multi-Sensory Stimulation in 24-hour Dementia Care - Nivel

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?