21.03.2013 Views

LTBB Master Land Use Plan - Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa ...

LTBB Master Land Use Plan - Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa ...

LTBB Master Land Use Plan - Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.<br />

is these changes that will in part drive development in the area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>LTBB</strong> Reservation. In any<br />

case, the tribal member population living in this area is by definition a part <strong>of</strong> these trends in age<br />

distribution. This is shown in Table _ . As can be seen in this table, and Figure _ that accompanies<br />

it, there is not a great deal <strong>of</strong> variation in the age cohort distribution between MCD’s in the<br />

Reservation area. As is typical,<br />

Population Density/Distribution The graph “<strong>LTBB</strong> Reservation – Population Density”(Graph One), and the matching Table Two<br />

that precedes it, show us the density <strong>of</strong> population in persons per square mile, for each Minor Civil<br />

Division in the <strong>LTBB</strong> Reservation area. In addition, the table then connects this information with<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> housing units, and their density per square mile.<br />

In the table, one pattern is immediately obvious, which is that the highest density populations<br />

live in the incorporated cities <strong>of</strong> Charlevoix, Harbor Springs, and Petoskey. Likewise, areas with the<br />

lowest total populations also have the lowest density. It is telling, though, that the municipality with<br />

the second highest population in the area has a population density that is roughly one tenth that <strong>of</strong><br />

the City <strong>of</strong> Charlevoix. This holds true in the area <strong>of</strong> housing as well, particularly in Charlevoix,<br />

where there is nearly one housing unit per person, but they are squeezed into only 2 square miles <strong>of</strong><br />

area.<br />

Contrasting the clearly urban pattern <strong>of</strong> development in the City <strong>of</strong> Charlevoix and other similar<br />

areas is the low density <strong>of</strong> Bear Creek Township. This pattern has important implications for the<br />

future land use <strong>of</strong> rural areas, since the greater efficiencies <strong>of</strong> higher population and housing density<br />

must be planned for and regulated in order to happen. The obvious trend is that newer growth tends<br />

to take up more land than older growth did, with larger and larger lot sizes, and the higher cost <strong>of</strong><br />

public services that this brings with it.<br />

As the <strong>Little</strong> <strong>Traverse</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Bands</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Odawa</strong> Indians begins to make a greater number <strong>of</strong><br />

development decisions relating to this growth, the positive and negative aspects <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

growth pattern need to be kept in mind in order to both maximize the value <strong>of</strong> Tribal investment and<br />

ensure the greatest life span for that investment. In other words, it may not make sense in some<br />

cases to capitalize on a development pattern that will eventually collapse on itself due to inefficiency<br />

and inability to maintain land values.<br />

As can be seen in the table, and the graph that follows, the general pattern is that population<br />

density is relatively high only in the Cities <strong>of</strong> Petoskey, Charlevoix, and Harbor Springs. Elsewhere,<br />

in the townships, density is only a fraction as much. This is to be expected, given the rural land use<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> forests and farms. Of interest, though, is moderately high density in Bear Creek, Resort,<br />

and West <strong>Traverse</strong> Townships. Not as densely developed as the cities, but four to six times as dense<br />

as the “rural” areas in Emmet County. This, along with other evidence, gives us a clear indication <strong>of</strong><br />

the growth pressure on these three areas.<br />

Educational Attainment as Percent <strong>of</strong> Population Age 18+<br />

The graph labeled “<strong>LTBB</strong> Reservation – Education Attainment as Percent <strong>of</strong> Population Age<br />

18+” (Graph Two) and the table found above it (Table Three) shows us both the actual numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

persons over the age <strong>of</strong> 18 at the time <strong>of</strong> the 2000 Census. It also shows what portion <strong>of</strong> them did<br />

not graduate from High School with a diploma, possesses a High School diploma, has some college,<br />

and attained a Bachelors Degree or more college education.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!