LTBB Master Land Use Plan - Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STATE-WIDE PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS The resulting lists from each meeting were then combined and tabulated. The first step in the tabulation process was to eliminate from the list items that, while suggested at a meeting, received no votes at any meeting. The end product of this process was a list that contained only items that had been voted on and ranked by participants. Next, a calculation was done on each individual item to ascertain it’s relative strength of support among the various attendees at all of the meetings. Therefore, the result of this calculation indicated not only how many times an item was voted on, but what rank it received and how often it received that rank. For example, if at the conclusion of all meetings a particular idea had received a “1” vote, only once, it would be awarded a total score of 1. If it had received a score of “2”, perhaps twice, it would be given a score of .5, twice (once each for every time it got that score), and its resulting total score would also be 1. A total of 425 total votes were cast at all meetings, on 120 individual items. Of these 120 items, all but 16 received at least one vote during one meeting or more. A total of 71 items were given a final score of 1.00 or higher, indicating that they were either scored a “1” at least once, or were scored a lesser priority a cumulative number of times to equal 1.00 or more. The complete result of this calculation process is presented in Appendix D. Finally, and also presented in Appendix D, is a table and graph of the top ranking ideas. These are somewhat arbitrarily ended at Number 20, in the interest of space saving. Graphically, however, it is clear that the Victories 2 project commanded a great deal of interest and preference among the meeting attendees. It received a weighted score over twice as high as the next item, at 16.744 points. If any pattern can be gleaned from these results, it is that, in general, the areas of health care and economic development in one form or another were responsible for the majority of interest. This is not to say that other areas were not represented, just that these two areas received the largest share of total weighted points. What this means in terms of priority setting and preferences in land acquisition is not completely clear, but rather will have to be ascertained over time. This will happen only as Tribal Council and the new Executive branch of government seek to interpret these results and turn them into actions that benefit the Tribal membership. Depending on resources available at any given time, this may or may not result in land acquisition or property development. It may also result in re-alignment or redevelopment of land currently owned or held in trust relative to the Tribe. 45
Appendices A. Proposed Land Acquisition and Land Development Policies B. Tables and Graphs C. Maps D. Survey Data 46
Page 1 and 2: LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA
Page 5 and 6: development patterns in the Reserva
Page 7 and 8: The basic structure of this documen
Page 9 and 10: The Little Traverse Bay Bands was o
Page 11 and 12: LTBB RESERVATION AND COUNTY PROFILE
Page 13 and 14: As can be seen most clearly in the
Page 15 and 16: Charlevoix and the City of Petoskey
Page 17 and 18: Table 13 is entitled “LTBB Reserv
Page 19 and 20: precisely why this is the case, alt
Page 21 and 22: PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE LTBB RESER
Page 23 and 24: would be to say “over the last 10
Page 25 and 26: tranquility of the lakes are all pa
Page 27 and 28: actually is county, state, or feder
Page 31 and 32: THE MODEL This need for a predictiv
Page 33 and 34: c. Merrge Emmet and Charlevoix Road
Page 35 and 36: Conservation = 19 - Open Land and O
Page 37 and 38: 1 Conservation 10 3 Open Space 8 5
Page 40 and 41: . 39
Page 42 and 43: . . . LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF
Page 44 and 45: LTBB MASTER LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC PA
Page 48 and 49: Appendix A. Proposed Land Developme
Page 50 and 51: vii. If the parcel is found to fit
Page 52 and 53: LTBB Reservation - Age Distribution
Page 54 and 55: Charlevoix County Area Name 18+ Pop
Page 56 and 57: LTBB Reservation - Household and Fa
Page 58 and 59: Grades KG-12 Grades KG-12 Grades PK
Page 60 and 61: MCD White alone LTBB Reservation -
Page 62 and 63: Population 70000 60000 50000 40000
Page 64 and 65: 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00
Page 66 and 67: LTBB Reservation - Housing Characte
Page 68 and 69: LTBB Reservation - Household Income
Page 70 and 71: Percent Change 100.00 80.00 60.00 4
Page 72 and 73: 8,308 acres Poor 9,120 acres Somewh
Page 101 and 102:
100
Page 103 and 104:
102
Page 106 and 107:
Computed Public Input Results 1 16.
Page 108 and 109:
0.625Tribal center for community me
Page 110:
18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000
show all

LTBB Master Land Use Plan - Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?