BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa
BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa
BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BoR (11) 54<br />
If the network operators do pursue a one stop shop strategy, it will be important for<br />
each fixed/mobile operator not to cannibalise their own fixed/mobile segment. One of<br />
the ways in which operators may seek to ensure there is no cannibalisation of other<br />
products in their portfolio is to follow a strategy whereby certain products are aimed at<br />
certain parts of the market. For example, a network operator with both a fixed and a<br />
mobile network may aim fixed and mobile voice at different value segments (e.g. low<br />
value vs. premium segment).<br />
Furthermore, NRAs should consider in their analysis of substitution the existence of<br />
aggressive strategies of integrated mobile/fixed network operators to gain critical mass<br />
in the market (e. g. strong promotion programmes for new customers). Such market<br />
strategies could have a significant influence on customer’s loyalty to its existing<br />
network operator as well as their preferred way to communicate (fixed vs. mobile<br />
voice/broadband). These strategies may also create more or less temporary changes<br />
in the adoption of different technologies and networks by the end users.<br />
The effects of substitution may be higher in a market structure dominated by stand-<br />
alone fixed/mobile network operators, whereas complementary effects may be more<br />
probable within a market of bundled offers by integrated fixed/mobile network<br />
operators. Therefore market structure and market strategy of fixed/mobile operators<br />
and their competitors could be essential for a further analysis of substitutability.<br />
Questionnaire results<br />
The results of the questionnaire show that most NRAs consider that an analysis of<br />
market structure and market strategy is relevant or even a key parameter in assessing<br />
FMS for both voice and broadband. About one half of NRAs have already considered it<br />
when looking at retail market definition for broadband and about one third of NRAs<br />
when looking at retail market definition for voice. Only a small minority of NRAs<br />
consider that any kind of cooperation between fixed/mobile operators and the level of<br />
competition in the fixed/mobile segment are not applicable. As far as the existence of<br />
an aggressive market strategy by a network operator is concerned one half of NRAs<br />
believe this is relevant but not essential whereas the other half of NRAs consider this<br />
either as not applicable or a key parameter.<br />
6.3. Analysis of bundled offers<br />
When NRAs analyse FMS it may be important to consider whether there are<br />
differences in the bundles of fixed services and mobile services offered which could<br />
affect substitutability between the two.<br />
31