21.03.2013 Views

BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa

BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa

BEREC REPORT ON IMPACT OF FIXED-MOBILE ... - berec - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BoR (11) 54<br />

If the network operators do pursue a one stop shop strategy, it will be important for<br />

each fixed/mobile operator not to cannibalise their own fixed/mobile segment. One of<br />

the ways in which operators may seek to ensure there is no cannibalisation of other<br />

products in their portfolio is to follow a strategy whereby certain products are aimed at<br />

certain parts of the market. For example, a network operator with both a fixed and a<br />

mobile network may aim fixed and mobile voice at different value segments (e.g. low<br />

value vs. premium segment).<br />

Furthermore, NRAs should consider in their analysis of substitution the existence of<br />

aggressive strategies of integrated mobile/fixed network operators to gain critical mass<br />

in the market (e. g. strong promotion programmes for new customers). Such market<br />

strategies could have a significant influence on customer’s loyalty to its existing<br />

network operator as well as their preferred way to communicate (fixed vs. mobile<br />

voice/broadband). These strategies may also create more or less temporary changes<br />

in the adoption of different technologies and networks by the end users.<br />

The effects of substitution may be higher in a market structure dominated by stand-<br />

alone fixed/mobile network operators, whereas complementary effects may be more<br />

probable within a market of bundled offers by integrated fixed/mobile network<br />

operators. Therefore market structure and market strategy of fixed/mobile operators<br />

and their competitors could be essential for a further analysis of substitutability.<br />

Questionnaire results<br />

The results of the questionnaire show that most NRAs consider that an analysis of<br />

market structure and market strategy is relevant or even a key parameter in assessing<br />

FMS for both voice and broadband. About one half of NRAs have already considered it<br />

when looking at retail market definition for broadband and about one third of NRAs<br />

when looking at retail market definition for voice. Only a small minority of NRAs<br />

consider that any kind of cooperation between fixed/mobile operators and the level of<br />

competition in the fixed/mobile segment are not applicable. As far as the existence of<br />

an aggressive market strategy by a network operator is concerned one half of NRAs<br />

believe this is relevant but not essential whereas the other half of NRAs consider this<br />

either as not applicable or a key parameter.<br />

6.3. Analysis of bundled offers<br />

When NRAs analyse FMS it may be important to consider whether there are<br />

differences in the bundles of fixed services and mobile services offered which could<br />

affect substitutability between the two.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!