22.03.2013 Views

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>IARC</str<strong>on</strong>g> MONOGRAPHS VOLUME 79<br />

testing. These studies did not include <strong>the</strong> results for phenobarbital users specifically but<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong> combined group of barbiturate users.]<br />

In a compani<strong>on</strong> study, based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 368 users of barbiturates, Habel et al.<br />

(1998) observed 34 cases of bladder cancer in <strong>the</strong> 1992 follow-up, yielding an overall<br />

SIR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51–1.0). The SIRs for current smokers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> former smokers<br />

were 0.56 (0.23–1.2) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.68 (0.27–1.4), respectively, whereas <strong>the</strong> SIR for people<br />

who had never smoked was 1.04 (0.48–2.0), indicating an inverse associati<strong>on</strong> between<br />

barbiturate treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> bladder cancer risk <strong>on</strong>ly am<strong>on</strong>g current <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> former smokers.<br />

2.2 Case–c<strong>on</strong>trol studies (see Table 2)<br />

In order to evaluate <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ships between cancer in children <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> drugs given to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir mo<strong>the</strong>rs during pregnancy, S<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Draper (1979) studied 11 169 matched<br />

case–c<strong>on</strong>trol pairs of children aged up to 15 years included in <strong>the</strong> Oxford Survey of<br />

Childhood Cancers. A history of epilepsy was reported by 39 case mo<strong>the</strong>rs [0.35%] <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

22 c<strong>on</strong>trol mo<strong>the</strong>rs [0.20%]; a review of available medical records (for 30 case mo<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 18 c<strong>on</strong>trol mo<strong>the</strong>rs) showed no difference in <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong>s of mo<strong>the</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong> two<br />

groups who had received phenobarbital (67% <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 67%). Six of <strong>the</strong> 39 tumours in<br />

children of mo<strong>the</strong>rs with epilepsy were lymphomas, when four cases would have been<br />

expected <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> of lymphomas am<strong>on</strong>g childhood cancers in <strong>the</strong><br />

populati<strong>on</strong>. [The Working Group noted that <strong>the</strong> number of children with brain tumours<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 39 mo<strong>the</strong>rs with epilepsy was not given.]<br />

In a case–c<strong>on</strong>trol study by Gold et al. (1978), all children under 20 years of age in<br />

whom brain tumours had been diagnosed in <strong>the</strong> Baltimore area, Maryl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> (USA),<br />

between 1965 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1975 were ascertained from multiple data sources, including hospital<br />

tumour registries <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> death certificates. Of a total of 127 children who were eligible for<br />

<strong>the</strong> study, 84 were included (resp<strong>on</strong>se rate, 66%) after completi<strong>on</strong> of an interview with<br />

<strong>the</strong> parents. The parents of 76 populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trols [resp<strong>on</strong>se rate not provided] selected<br />

from birth certificates <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> matched to case children by race, sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> date of birth <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

112 cancer c<strong>on</strong>trols [resp<strong>on</strong>se rate not provided] selected from <strong>the</strong> same data sources as<br />

<strong>the</strong> cases <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> matched by race, sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> date <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> age at diagnosis were also interviewed<br />

[<strong>the</strong> items included in <strong>the</strong> interview were not fully characterized]. These subjects<br />

formed 73 matched pairs of brain tumour patients <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trols <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 78<br />

matched pairs of brain tumour patients <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> cancer c<strong>on</strong>trols, which were analysed<br />

separately. In <strong>the</strong> substudy in which populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trols were used, maternal intake of<br />

barbiturates during <strong>the</strong> index pregnancy was associated with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95%<br />

CI, 0.3–22). Use of barbiturates by <strong>the</strong> children <strong>the</strong>mselves was associated with an odds<br />

ratio of 2.5 (0.4–26). In <strong>the</strong> sub-study of matched pairs with cancer c<strong>on</strong>trols, <strong>the</strong><br />

associati<strong>on</strong> with prenatal exposure became significant (lower 95% c<strong>on</strong>fidence bound,<br />

1.5). Any use of barbiturates pre- or postnatally was significantly associated with brain<br />

tumours in <strong>the</strong> analysis with cancer c<strong>on</strong>trols (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.2–51), but not<br />

in that with populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trols (3.0; 0.8–17). [The Working Group noted that nei<strong>the</strong>r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!