22.03.2013 Views

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

Phenobarbital and its Sodium Salt - IARC Monographs on the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210<br />

of hepatocellular carcinomas were significantly greater in those receiving NDEA plus<br />

phenobarbital (number, 11.7 ± 1.0 versus 4.0 ± 1.1, p < 0.001; volume %, 54.2 ± 3.6<br />

versus 20.8 ± 5.5, p < 0.001). Adenomas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> preneoplastic foci were induced by<br />

phenobarbital al<strong>on</strong>e at week 23, while <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>trol MT42 mouse developed foci at<br />

that time. By week 37, 5/5 MT42 mice given NDEA <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2/6 given phenobarbital<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly had developed hepatocellular carcinomas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> adenomas. In CD-1 mice, NDEA<br />

initiati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> phenobarbital promoti<strong>on</strong> significantly increased <strong>the</strong> numbers per liver <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

volume per cent of adenomas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> foci at 23 weeks when compared with those given<br />

NDEA al<strong>on</strong>e (number of foci, 30.7 ± 9.8 versus 5.4 ± 3.8, p < 0.05; foci volume,<br />

0.16% ± 0.06 versus 0.03% ± 0.02, p < 0.05; number of adenomas, 4.1 ± 1.4 versus<br />

0.6 ± 0.3, p < 0.05). No tumours or adenomas were found in CD-1 mice given NDEA<br />

al<strong>on</strong>e or phenobarbital al<strong>on</strong>e. The number per liver <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> volume per cent of hepatocellular<br />

carcinomas in MT42 mice given NDEA <strong>on</strong>ly or NDEA plus phenobarbital were<br />

significantly higher than those in CD-1 mice at weeks 23 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 37. The proliferating cell<br />

nuclear antigen-labelling indices of <strong>the</strong> foci <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> adenomas in MT42 mice given NDEA<br />

al<strong>on</strong>e or NDEA plus phenobarbital were significantly higher than those in CD-1 mice<br />

(Tamano et al., 1994). [The Working Group noted <strong>the</strong> inadequate number of animals per<br />

group.]<br />

3.3.2 Promoti<strong>on</strong> in rat liver<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>IARC</str<strong>on</strong>g> MONOGRAPHS VOLUME 79<br />

(a) Effects of subsequent administrati<strong>on</strong> of phenobarbital<br />

Groups of (SD/Anl[Anl 66]) rats [initial number, sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> age not specified] were<br />

given diets c<strong>on</strong>taining 0.02% 2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) for 11, 16, 21 or 26 days.<br />

At each of <strong>the</strong>se intervals, 36 rats were transferred to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol diet <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ano<strong>the</strong>r 36<br />

were transferred to a diet c<strong>on</strong>taining 0.05% phenobarbital. Four rats from each group<br />

were killed at 21-day intervals starting 91 days after <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> experiment.<br />

The subsequent treatment with phenobarbital for up to 260 days increased <strong>the</strong> incidence<br />

of hepatomas at each of <strong>the</strong> four periods of AAF treatment (AAF 11 days, 2/105; AAF<br />

11 days followed by phenobarbital, 17/106; AAF 16 days, 7/101; AAF 16 days<br />

followed by phenobarbital, 42/104; AAF 21 days, 18/103; AAF 21 days followed by<br />

phenobarbital, 64/102; AAF 26 days, 27/103; AAF 26 days followed by phenobarbital,<br />

86/108; two-way analysis of variance for durati<strong>on</strong> of AAF feeding, p < 0.05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for<br />

phenobarbital treatment, p < 0.01). At each sacrifice interval, more rats given both AAF<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> phenobarbital had tumours. The hepatomas found at <strong>the</strong> early sacrifice intervals<br />

were seen <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>the</strong> groups that had been fed AAF for <strong>the</strong> two l<strong>on</strong>ger periods (Peraino<br />

et al., 1971).<br />

To investigate <strong>the</strong> effects of varying <strong>the</strong> time of exposure to phenobarbital <strong>on</strong><br />

enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis, groups of 106–109 male Sprague-Dawley rats,<br />

22 days of age, were given diets c<strong>on</strong>taining 0.02% AAF for 3 weeks <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> were <strong>the</strong>n fed<br />

a diet c<strong>on</strong>taining 0.05% phenobarbital for various times: AAF diet for 18 days <strong>the</strong>n<br />

phenobarbital diet; AAF diet for 18 days <strong>the</strong>n phenobarbital diet for 5 days <strong>the</strong>n c<strong>on</strong>trol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!