Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />
(b) <strong>Opinion</strong>s relating to incorporation, organization, existence,<br />
and good standing do not cover licenses, registrations, or other governmental<br />
or third-party approvals that might be required prior to<br />
commencement of a particular type of business but that were not a<br />
condition to incorporation. If such matters are to be covered in an<br />
<strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong>, they should be covered by a separate <strong>Opinion</strong> on the<br />
applicability of and compliance with those licensing requirements.<br />
C. Qualification in Principal Foreign State<br />
1C. The Company is duly qualified as a foreign corporation<br />
and is in good standing in the (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)<br />
[if Borrower is a Delaware corporation] (State of ___) [if Borrower<br />
is a Pennsylvania corporation].<br />
Note: (a) ABA Guideline 4.1 states that this <strong>Opinion</strong> should<br />
normally not be requested on a cost-justified basis because it involves<br />
extensive factual inquiry and a review of the law of jurisdictions<br />
where the <strong>Opinion</strong> Giver would not reasonably be expected to<br />
have expertise. See also Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report § 6.1.6. The <strong>Opinion</strong> Giver<br />
may have an experienced corporate service company obtain the certificates<br />
customarily obtained by it in the particular states involved<br />
based upon a factual certificate from the client, and then, if an<br />
<strong>Opinion</strong> is required, rely on those certificates without further inquiry.<br />
Id. The Pennsylvania <strong>Opinion</strong> Report does not deal with an<br />
<strong>Opinion</strong> as to qualification in a foreign state.<br />
(b) Sometimes the <strong>Opinion</strong> that the Company is qualified in all<br />
states where necessary was limited to states where the failure to be<br />
qualified would not have a “material adverse affect.” However, an<br />
<strong>Opinion</strong> as to “material adverse effect” is based in large part on a<br />
financial judgment, and ABA Guideline 1.4 states that an <strong>Opinion</strong><br />
requiring interpretation of financial statements should not be requested;<br />
in addition, ABA Guideline 3.2 discourages the use of the<br />
“materiality” concept in an <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong>, unless objectively defined.<br />
ABA Guideline 4.1 indicates that qualification and good<br />
standing certificates (and tax certificates where available) from<br />
public officials, without a legal <strong>Opinion</strong>, should be sufficient. The<br />
Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report, section 6.1.6, is in accord.<br />
(c) At most, the Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Committee believes that any <strong>Opinion</strong><br />
on foreign qualification should be limited to named states (following<br />
the format of <strong>Opinion</strong> paragraph 1C), based on the Public<br />
Authority Documents referred to in note (a) thereto.<br />
66