23.03.2013 Views

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />

(7) Concurrence. An <strong>Opinion</strong> that an Other <strong>Opinion</strong> is “satisfactory<br />

in form and substance” is considered to be the same as a<br />

“concurrence” in the Other <strong>Opinion</strong>, requiring an independent investigation<br />

of the Law involved. Because concurrences are typically<br />

time-consuming and not cost-effective, ordinarily a concurrence<br />

should not be requested. See Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report § 5.1 n.99; ABA Guideline<br />

2.2.<br />

E. Additional Assumptions and Qualifications<br />

(E) The foregoing opinions are subject to the following additional<br />

assumptions and qualifications:<br />

Note: Many of the following paragraphs from (E)(1) to (E)(4), and<br />

(optional) (E)(5) to (E)(8), are meant to be simply suggestive of possible<br />

assumptions or qualifications that may or may not be appropriate<br />

in any specific transaction.<br />

1. Pennsylvania Qualification as to Usury<br />

(E)(1) With respect to the opinion in paragraph 7, we call<br />

your attention to the provisions of Section 911(b) of the Pennsylvania<br />

Crimes Code (the “Crimes Code”), 18 Pa.C.S. § 911(b),<br />

which makes it unlawful to use or invest income derived from a<br />

pattern of “racketeering activity” in the establishment or operation<br />

of any enterprise. “Racketeering activity,” as defined in the<br />

Crimes Code, includes the collection of money or other property<br />

in full or partial satisfaction of a debt which arose as the result of<br />

the lending of money or other property at a rate of interest<br />

exceeding 25% per annum where not otherwise authorized by<br />

law. Accordingly, the opinion expressed in paragraph 7 is qualified<br />

to the extent, if any, that the statute referenced in this paragraph<br />

(E)(1) may be applicable to this transaction.<br />

Note: Because <strong>Opinion</strong> paragraph 7 opines as to violation of applicable<br />

statutory law of Pennsylvania, depending on the circumstances,<br />

a usury qualification may be appropriate as to <strong>Opinion</strong><br />

paragraph 7. See note (b) to <strong>Opinion</strong> 7, p. 86, above.<br />

2. Qualification as to Right of Set-off<br />

(E)(2) We express no opinion as to (i) Section ___ of the<br />

Credit Agreement insofar as it authorizes each Bank to set off<br />

and apply any deposits at any time held, and any other indebtedness<br />

at any time owing, by such Bank to or for the account of the<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!