Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />
(7) Concurrence. An <strong>Opinion</strong> that an Other <strong>Opinion</strong> is “satisfactory<br />
in form and substance” is considered to be the same as a<br />
“concurrence” in the Other <strong>Opinion</strong>, requiring an independent investigation<br />
of the Law involved. Because concurrences are typically<br />
time-consuming and not cost-effective, ordinarily a concurrence<br />
should not be requested. See Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report § 5.1 n.99; ABA Guideline<br />
2.2.<br />
E. Additional Assumptions and Qualifications<br />
(E) The foregoing opinions are subject to the following additional<br />
assumptions and qualifications:<br />
Note: Many of the following paragraphs from (E)(1) to (E)(4), and<br />
(optional) (E)(5) to (E)(8), are meant to be simply suggestive of possible<br />
assumptions or qualifications that may or may not be appropriate<br />
in any specific transaction.<br />
1. Pennsylvania Qualification as to Usury<br />
(E)(1) With respect to the opinion in paragraph 7, we call<br />
your attention to the provisions of Section 911(b) of the Pennsylvania<br />
Crimes Code (the “Crimes Code”), 18 Pa.C.S. § 911(b),<br />
which makes it unlawful to use or invest income derived from a<br />
pattern of “racketeering activity” in the establishment or operation<br />
of any enterprise. “Racketeering activity,” as defined in the<br />
Crimes Code, includes the collection of money or other property<br />
in full or partial satisfaction of a debt which arose as the result of<br />
the lending of money or other property at a rate of interest<br />
exceeding 25% per annum where not otherwise authorized by<br />
law. Accordingly, the opinion expressed in paragraph 7 is qualified<br />
to the extent, if any, that the statute referenced in this paragraph<br />
(E)(1) may be applicable to this transaction.<br />
Note: Because <strong>Opinion</strong> paragraph 7 opines as to violation of applicable<br />
statutory law of Pennsylvania, depending on the circumstances,<br />
a usury qualification may be appropriate as to <strong>Opinion</strong><br />
paragraph 7. See note (b) to <strong>Opinion</strong> 7, p. 86, above.<br />
2. Qualification as to Right of Set-off<br />
(E)(2) We express no opinion as to (i) Section ___ of the<br />
Credit Agreement insofar as it authorizes each Bank to set off<br />
and apply any deposits at any time held, and any other indebtedness<br />
at any time owing, by such Bank to or for the account of the<br />
102