23.03.2013 Views

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />

Note: One way lawyers establish the factual bases for an <strong>Opinion</strong><br />

<strong>Letter</strong> is to assume certain facts to be true. A factual assumption is<br />

a bridge that allows the <strong>Opinion</strong> Preparers to render an <strong>Opinion</strong><br />

without investigation as to the facts being assumed. Subject to the<br />

qualification as to unwarranted reliance (described above in note<br />

(a) to section B, p. 92, above), the <strong>Opinion</strong> Giver may rely, without<br />

investigation, on (i) any assumptions expressly stated in the <strong>Opinion</strong><br />

<strong>Letter</strong>, and (ii) certain assumptions that are implicit and need<br />

not be stated expressly. The Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report states in section 2.3 that<br />

<strong>Opinion</strong> Preparers are often permitted by the <strong>Opinion</strong> Recipient to<br />

rely on assumptions when (i) information is not available (or is<br />

only available at substantial cost or delay), (ii) the facts being assumed<br />

relate to the <strong>Opinion</strong> Recipient, or (iii) the cost of establishing<br />

the facts exceeds the likely benefit from an investigation to<br />

verify their existence.<br />

Assumptions regarding facts that are common to transactions generally<br />

and apply regardless of the type of transaction or the nature<br />

of the parties need not be stated in <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong>s. See Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report<br />

§ 2.3(a); ABA Principles IIID. Glazer, in section 4.3.3, concludes<br />

that assumptions of general application, such as those set<br />

forth in section 4 of the ABA Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Accord, may be relied<br />

on without being stated, and concludes that<br />

96<br />

[o]mitting those assumptions allows stated assumptions to be<br />

reserved for matters that are not of general application, that<br />

are controversial, that require precise delineation or that might<br />

give rise to a misunderstanding if not spelled out expressly.<br />

Based on the foregoing principles, the Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Committee believes<br />

that it is proper and customary practice in Pennsylvania to<br />

omit from <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong>s self-evident assumptions of general application<br />

such as the following:<br />

1. Legal capacity: Clients who are natural persons, and<br />

natural persons acting on the client’s behalf, have the requisite<br />

legal capacity.<br />

2. Title to property: The client holds the requisite title and<br />

rights to any property involved.<br />

3. Legal requirements re enforceability—parties other than<br />

the client: Each party (other than the client) has satisfied legal<br />

requirements necessary to make the Transaction Docu-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!