23.03.2013 Views

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />

Matters Dealt with in the <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong><br />

The <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> is an opinion letter of Borrower’s counsel<br />

relating to an unsecured bank credit agreement, but much of<br />

the introductory language and the qualifications and assumptions<br />

are usable in closing opinions in a number of other types of transactions.<br />

The <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> is annotated to describe what<br />

the Committee believes is customary practice in giving and receiving<br />

third-party legal <strong>Opinion</strong>s.<br />

The <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> should be read in conjunction with applicable<br />

commentary in the Pennsylvania Third-Party Legal <strong>Opinion</strong><br />

Report. The Committee believes that the <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> and<br />

its annotations accurately describe customary practice in thirdparty<br />

legal <strong>Opinion</strong>s by knowledgeable Pennsylvania lawyers.<br />

It is assumed that the <strong>Opinion</strong> Giver, a Pennsylvania lawyer or<br />

firm of lawyers, will not feel competent to express substantive<br />

opinions on matters of New York law. Many Pennsylvania lawyers<br />

or firms feel sufficiently competent to be able to express an opinion<br />

on Delaware corporate, limited liability company or partnership<br />

law, usually limited to (i) matters of organizational status (due<br />

incorporation or organization, valid existence, good standing, and<br />

the like) and authorization of transaction documents, and (ii) an<br />

<strong>Opinion</strong> as to whether the transaction documents violate the Delaware<br />

General Corporation Law or the specific Delaware statute<br />

regarding limited liability companies or partnerships, as applicable.<br />

It is therefore assumed in the <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> that the<br />

<strong>Opinion</strong> Giver is competent to give an <strong>Opinion</strong> on such matters<br />

under the laws of Delaware. 3<br />

3. See Tri<strong>Bar</strong>, Third-Party <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong>s: Limited Liability Companies,<br />

61 Bus. Law. 679 (2006), for a description of customary practice in giving<br />

opinions on Delaware limited liability companies. As is the case when<br />

opining on Delaware corporations under the Delaware General Corporation<br />

Law, a reference to the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act<br />

means that the <strong>Opinion</strong> Preparer has reviewed the statute, any applicable<br />

constitutional provisions, and cases interpreting the statute.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!