Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Model Closing Opinion Letter (Annotated) - American Bar Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Closing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> (<strong>Annotated</strong>)<br />
to us as copies, the due authority of the parties executing such<br />
documents (other than those executing on behalf of the Company),<br />
and the legal capacity of natural persons.]<br />
Note: The Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Committee believes that this assumption<br />
is unnecessary. See the note to paragraph (B)(4), items 1, 3,<br />
and 4, p. 96, above.<br />
E.7. Assumptions as to Other Parties<br />
[(E)(7) In making our examination of documents which call<br />
for execution by parties other than the Company (“Other Parties”),<br />
we have assumed the enforceability thereof against all the<br />
Other Parties; and we have assumed that each of the Other Parties<br />
(i) has satisfied those legal requirements that are applicable<br />
to it to the extent necessary to make the Loan Documents<br />
enforceable against it, and (ii) has complied with all legal requirements<br />
pertaining to its status as such status relates to its rights<br />
to enforce the Loan Documents against the Company.]<br />
Note: The Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Committee believes that this assumption<br />
is unnecessary. See the note to paragraph (B)(4), item 3, p. 96,<br />
above.<br />
E.8. Presumption of Regularity and Continuity<br />
[(E)(8) In connection with our opinion in paragraph __ above<br />
concerning [describe subject matter], our investigation revealed<br />
that certain corporate records concerning [specify the missing<br />
records and describe their relevance] were missing [or incomplete].<br />
As a consequence, we have relied upon the presumption<br />
of regularity and continuity to the extent necessary to enable us<br />
to provide that opinion.]<br />
Note: The foregoing presumption is appropriate where there is no<br />
known basis for reaching a different conclusion. The ABA Guideline<br />
3.3 indicates that, ordinarily, reliance on the presumption does<br />
not need to be disclosed except when the deficiency in corporate<br />
records is likely to be significant. The Legal <strong>Opinion</strong> Committee<br />
concurs with the Tri<strong>Bar</strong> Report, which indicates in section 2.4 that<br />
where (i) the missing records are not recent, (ii) existing records indicate<br />
that the Company ordinarily has been careful to observe formalities,<br />
and (iii) subsequent records treat the action as having<br />
been properly authorized, the presumption may be relied on without<br />
disclosure.<br />
108