DISTRICT COLUMBIA

Recommendations

Info

108 FACILITY CONDITION AND QUALITY What is the physical condition of the facility? How does the facility encourage quality education? These questions are answered in this section by scoring DCPS school settings. FACILITY CONDITION What is the physical state of the facility, considering elements such as the roof, windows and heating and cooling system? The facilities with the highest physical condition score are determined to have the greatest need. This measure pertains only to the DCPS only through the 2008 FCI (see chapter 5 for further explanation). There was no relevant data for charter schools. The scale below is the result of the data collection and interpretation as outlined in the Facility Condition section of Chapter 5. Condition (Weight 5) Score >= 86% Condition Score 5 51% – 85% Condition Score 4 26% – 50% Condition Score 3 1% – 25% Condition Score Weight = 5 1 FACILITY QUALITY What is the educational efficacy of the facility? Facility quality was measured differently for DCPS than for charter schools. For a thorough description, refer to Appendix G. The facilities with the highest quality score are determined to have the greatest need. The scale below is the result of the data collection and interpretation as outlined in the Facility Quality section of Chapter 5. Quality (Weight 5) Score >= 70% Efficacy Score 5 54% – 69% Efficacy Score 4 39% – 53% Efficacy Score 3 20% – 38% Efficacy Score 2 1% – 19% Efficacy Score Weight = 5 1 FACILITY CONDITION AND QUALITY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES Facility condition and quality affect the safety and comfort of students and educators, and can limit programming. Facility condition and quality may also influence parent and student perceptions about school quality. GP1: Focus on equity planning. Every child in every neighborhood should have access to a high quality facility that is in good condition. GP2: Build facilities around quality educational programs. High quality facilities support high quality educational programming. GP3: Align investments with projected student demand. In areas with high student demand, it is critical that facilities are in good condition as they affect a higher percentage of students.
ASSESSMENT OF NEED ASSESSMENT OF NEED FACILITY CONDITION AND QUALITY Facility Condition and Quality Data Weighting and Ranking of: » Facility Condition and Quality Figure 6.5 13 › Facility Condition › Facility Quality 11 14 The District of Columbia 4 42 10 15 12 5 41 1 6 16 40 2 18 45 7 17 8 3 44 9 LEGEND 22 Neighborhood Cluster No DCPS or PCS Schools in Cluster High Need Moderate High Need Moderate Need Moderate Low Need Low Need Public Education MastEr FacilitiEs Plan 21 25 19 43 27 20 39 37 23 22 28 26 38 36 46 35 24 34 32 29 30 Water 31 33 109
Page 1 and 2:
2013 PUBLIC EDUCATION MASTER FACILI
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER FIVE: FAC
Page 6:
2 HIGH QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL CH
Page 9 and 10:
ASSESSMENT OF NEED ASSESSMENT OF NE
Page 11 and 12:
Cluster Number 2 Cluster Name DCPS
Page 13:
LONG-TERM STRATEGIES Some of the re
Page 16 and 17:
12 BACKGROUND As part of the reform
Page 18 and 19:
KEY MAP DCPS & CHARTER SCHOOL DCPS
Page 20 and 21:
16 LEARNING FROM RESEARCH AND BEST
Page 22 and 23:
18 slightly different approach, all
Page 24:
20 PROJECT COMMUNICATION AND OUTREA
Page 27 and 28:
GUIDING PRINCIPLES “What matters
Page 29 and 30:
RELATIONSHIP TO PREVIOUS STUDIES 20
Page 31 and 32:
KEY MAP DCPS & CHARTER SCHOOL DCPS
Page 33 and 34:
FACILITY CONDITION The information
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 3 Enrollment, Capacity and
Page 37 and 38:
CAPACITY BY CLUSTER CAPACITY BY CLU
Page 39 and 40:
GSF GSF per per Enrolled Student v.
Page 41 and 42:
Comparison of Enrollment between DC
Page 43 and 44:
ENROLLMENT BY CLUSTER ENROLLMENT BY
Page 45 and 46:
GSF Utilization FINDINGS ENROLLMENT
Page 47 and 48:
OPPORTUNITIES Meetings with the wor
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER 4 Population and Enrollment
Page 53 and 54:
POPULATION CHANGE BY CLUSTER DEMOGR
Page 55 and 56:
FORECAST RANGES Figures 4.6 - 4.7 s
Page 57 and 58:
POPULATION FORECAST POPULATION FORE
Page 59 and 60:
Population Forecast by DC Office of
Page 62 and 63: 58 PREDICTED ENROLLMENT ENROLLMENT
Page 64 and 65: 60 POPULATION FORECAST PROJECTED UN
Page 66 and 67: 62 SNAPSHOT OF NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER
Page 68 and 69: 64 FACILITY QUALITY AND CONDITION S
Page 70 and 71: 66 In general, this index is a rela
Page 72 and 73: 68 and democratically decide who ge
Page 74 and 75: 70 Figure 5.7: Cave spaces for quie
Page 76 and 77: Welcoming Entry. m left). elcoming
Page 78 and 79: a ws how the he overall ). r cafés
Page 80 and 81: 76 Figure 5.19: Students dig in the
Page 82: 78 FINDINGS These findings refer to
Page 85 and 86: FACILITY QUALITY QUALITY FACILITY Q
Page 87 and 88: EQUITY EQUITY 1998-2018 DCPS AVERAG
Page 89 and 90: TRAVEL DISTANCE TRAVEL DISTANCE AVE
Page 91 and 92: EFEI Score 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25%
Page 93 and 94: Persistent Areas of Need Figure 5.3
Page 95 and 96: Capital Improvement Plan Constructi
Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 6 Prioritization Framework
Page 100 and 101: 96 CURRENT FIT NEED ASSESSMENT How
Page 102 and 103: 98 ASSESSMENT OF NEED ASSESSMENT OF
Page 104 and 105: 100 2017 PROJECTED FIT AND ITS RELA
Page 106 and 107: 102 1998-2012 DCPS MODERNIZATION EQ
Page 108 and 109: 104 ASSESSMENT OF NEED ASSESSMENT O
Page 110 and 111: 106 2017 PROJECTED NO. OF SCHOOL- A
Page 114 and 115: 110 Facility Needs Measures and Wei
Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 7 Recommendations
Page 119 and 120: ASSESSMENT OF NEED ASSESSMENT OF NE
Page 121 and 122: STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS NEEDS Short-T
Page 123 and 124: ST6: CREATE THE SPACE AND ENVIRONME
Page 125 and 126: Since no Phase 2 modernizations hav
Page 127 and 128: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 129 and 130: Working Group Alternates Rosalyn Hu
Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX A: SCHOOL LISTING
Page 133 and 134: 2008 DCPS Facility 2012‐2013 DCPS
Page 135 and 136: 2008 DCPS Facility 2012‐2013 DCPS
Page 137 and 138: 133
show all

DISTRICT COLUMBIA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?