Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
There are encouraging signs of a drop in the number of SCRs where a child had a CP<br />
plan for neglect in place at the time of the death or <strong>serious</strong> injury.<br />
Although we should be careful not to over-interpret these results because of the small<br />
numbers involved, looking at two year periods, we can see a gradual decrease over time<br />
from 12 per cent during 2005–07, to 9 per cent during 2007–09 <strong>and</strong> 6 per cent between<br />
2009–11. This could suggest that children in the community with a CP plan for neglect<br />
might be being better protected. It is possible that this reflects practice improvements <strong>and</strong><br />
that most recently, child protection plans for neglect were being used more successfully.<br />
This fall in the number of SCRs for children with a CP plan for neglect looks promising<br />
but the equivocal nature of neglect <strong>and</strong> the way it can be re-categorised also needs to<br />
be borne in mind. This means that we cannot be sure that the most <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong>s of<br />
neglect are formally recognised <strong>and</strong> that these children will always have a plan for<br />
their protection. It may be that many neglected children are slipping through the net of<br />
protective services.<br />
There was no similar decline in the number of <strong>reviews</strong> for children who had a<br />
discontinued CP plan for neglect – <strong>and</strong> the question remains as to why the plan was<br />
removed. With the benefit of hindsight it is apparent that the risks of <strong>serious</strong> harm had<br />
not abated once the plan was discontinued <strong>and</strong> that these children might have needed<br />
a CP plan again, or for longer. These children do seem to have fallen through the net<br />
<strong>and</strong> provide an argument for ensuring continued support <strong>and</strong> maintenance of safe care<br />
for children who have had a plan for neglect. These children should not be overlooked<br />
through the emphasis on early intervention.<br />
demographic characteriSticS<br />
2. <strong>Neglect</strong> in the lives of children who become the subject of a <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> review – a statistical overview<br />
Table 2.2 compares demographic characteristics for those 101 children with a current or<br />
discontinued plan for neglect with:<br />
• Other children for whom there was a plan but in a different category (74 children);<br />
• The whole sample of children for whom a SCR was conducted, excluding those with<br />
a CP plan under category of neglect (544 children). Columns 1a <strong>and</strong> 1c thus sum to<br />
the whole set of <strong>reviews</strong> in relation to 645 children.<br />
23