Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
figure 2.2: incidence of cp plan for neglect (at any time), <strong>and</strong> any other evidence of<br />
neglect, 2009–11 n=139<br />
• 18 children had a current or discontinued child protection plan under the category of<br />
neglect.<br />
• There was other evidence of neglect in a further 65 <strong>case</strong>s; making neglect a feature in<br />
a total of 83 (60%) of these 139 <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> <strong>reviews</strong> (Figure 2.2).<br />
<strong>Neglect</strong> featured fairly evenly across the age ranges of children, apart from in the 11–15<br />
year old group where neglect was a much more common feature in the child’s history<br />
(Table 2.11). A better awareness of the widespread existence of neglect in the history<br />
of vulnerable adolescents has been an important consequence of Rees <strong>and</strong> colleagues’<br />
study of adolescent neglect (Rees et al 2011).<br />
table 2.11: incidence of neglect by age group (2009–11)<br />
age group<br />
2. <strong>Neglect</strong> in the lives of children who become the subject of a <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> review – a statistical overview<br />
56<br />
40%<br />
18<br />
13%<br />
65<br />
47%<br />
incidence of neglect<br />
<strong>Neglect</strong> a feature of<br />
<strong>case</strong> (n=83)<br />
No mention of<br />
neglect (n=56)<br />