28.03.2013 Views

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

figure 2.2: incidence of cp plan for neglect (at any time), <strong>and</strong> any other evidence of<br />

neglect, 2009–11 n=139<br />

• 18 children had a current or discontinued child protection plan under the category of<br />

neglect.<br />

• There was other evidence of neglect in a further 65 <strong>case</strong>s; making neglect a feature in<br />

a total of 83 (60%) of these 139 <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> <strong>reviews</strong> (Figure 2.2).<br />

<strong>Neglect</strong> featured fairly evenly across the age ranges of children, apart from in the 11–15<br />

year old group where neglect was a much more common feature in the child’s history<br />

(Table 2.11). A better awareness of the widespread existence of neglect in the history<br />

of vulnerable adolescents has been an important consequence of Rees <strong>and</strong> colleagues’<br />

study of adolescent neglect (Rees et al 2011).<br />

table 2.11: incidence of neglect by age group (2009–11)<br />

age group<br />

2. <strong>Neglect</strong> in the lives of children who become the subject of a <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> review – a statistical overview<br />

56<br />

40%<br />

18<br />

13%<br />

65<br />

47%<br />

incidence of neglect<br />

<strong>Neglect</strong> a feature of<br />

<strong>case</strong> (n=83)<br />

No mention of<br />

neglect (n=56)<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!