28.03.2013 Views

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neglect</strong> <strong>and</strong> Serious Case Reviews<br />

themeS aNd learNiNg poiNtS<br />

child with complex medical needs or disability<br />

SCR suggests that medical professionals may be overly optimistic that<br />

families will be able to care for a child with a long-term illness even<br />

when there is evidence to the contrary.<br />

• Non-compliant parent(s): Ben’s mother refused to continue working<br />

with the first health visitor when she expressed concerns over Ben’s<br />

deterioration after the birth of his sibling. Rather than follow up on the<br />

health visitor’s intentions of involving social care, however, she was<br />

replaced by a second health visitor who again allowed the mother<br />

time to improve. The SCR suggests professionals did not appropriately<br />

challenge the mother’s behaviours in order to safeguard Ben.<br />

• changing family circumstances: Professionals (health care <strong>and</strong><br />

second health visitor) did not seem to have considered the impact of<br />

another child’s arrival in a family unit, where the mother was already<br />

struggling to care for a child with a long-term <strong>serious</strong> medical condition<br />

<strong>and</strong> a newly ended relationship. While allowing the mother more time<br />

to cope might have been an adequate response for a limited period<br />

of time, the changing family circumstances should have prompted a<br />

change in approach.<br />

• failure to involve father/partner: There was no sign that professionals<br />

included the father of the child in any assessment or asked about his<br />

involvement with Ben. For a long time, the identity of the father seemed<br />

unknown to professionals. This led the SCR to highlight the importance<br />

fathers/partners have on children’s wellbeing.<br />

Children in this category might have been born with complex health needs or disabilities,<br />

or they may have developed a <strong>serious</strong> childhood illness. All of these children, however,<br />

required long-term <strong>and</strong> often complicated care.<br />

parental responses to complex medical needs <strong>and</strong> disability<br />

52<br />

While some parents in these medical neglect <strong>case</strong>s responded to their child’s long-term<br />

medical condition with frequent hospital visits <strong>and</strong> attentive parenting, others displayed<br />

a less attentive, more clumsy way of interacting with the child or the child’s siblings <strong>and</strong><br />

this was flagged as a point of concern by hospital staff or children’s social care. In some<br />

instances, parents were unwilling to accept their child’s diagnosis, or were not fully<br />

capable of underst<strong>and</strong>ing their child’s condition. Early care of a child with an illness<br />

was often closely monitored by health visitors <strong>and</strong> in some <strong>case</strong>s by children’s social<br />

care. In most of these particular SCRs, parents were described as attempting to keep up<br />

with <strong>and</strong> fully underst<strong>and</strong> their child’s medical needs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!