28.03.2013 Views

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Neglect</strong> <strong>and</strong> Serious Case Reviews<br />

geNeral learNiNg poiNtS<br />

78<br />

• Young people in care often feel compelled to go back home even if it means more<br />

rejection. Once back home, young people <strong>and</strong> their families need a high level, intensive<br />

support not a low level service. They also need to have their strengths recognised <strong>and</strong><br />

to have safer <strong>and</strong> more protected routes to adulthood <strong>and</strong> independence.<br />

• At the age of 16 young people lose the protection of school <strong>and</strong> have no other protected<br />

routes to adulthood <strong>and</strong> few routes out of a neglectful situation at home.<br />

• Uncertainty from staff in universal services about whether the <strong>case</strong> warrants referral<br />

to children’s social care can leave children who are neglected in any of the ways<br />

described, at risk of death. Professional disagreement about the extent <strong>and</strong> impact of<br />

neglect can allow over-optimism about parental capacity to dominate.<br />

• Some adult <strong>and</strong> community services staff lack awareness of safeguarding <strong>and</strong> do<br />

not make the connections between the parents’ difficulties <strong>and</strong> vulnerabilities <strong>and</strong><br />

the impact these have on their capacity to keep the children safe from potentially<br />

predictable <strong>and</strong> preventable harm.<br />

• When many agencies are involved there may be unclear lines of responsibility. In<br />

these circumstances information is not brought together <strong>and</strong> analysed <strong>and</strong> new plans<br />

are not made or followed through with sufficient energy.<br />

• When families move it may be difficult to gain a full underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the family<br />

history, for example a history of violence against a child.<br />

• Parental hostility can keep professionals at bay <strong>and</strong> discourage them from following<br />

up missed appointments.<br />

• The worrying demeanour <strong>and</strong> development of one sibling can signal harm, including<br />

physical harm, to another sibling – especially babies who are at the most vulnerable<br />

age. Similarly, a history of neglectful care for older siblings can be a warning sign of<br />

the pattern of care a new baby will receive.<br />

• Failure to involve men/fathers as potentially protective influences who contribute to<br />

children’s wellbeing.<br />

• It is important for professionals to know the history of the child <strong>and</strong> family <strong>and</strong> to<br />

take it <strong>serious</strong>ly.<br />

• Strong management support is needed to help practitioners manage, monitor <strong>and</strong><br />

think systematically about a <strong>case</strong> where neglect is, or might be an issue.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!