28.03.2013 Views

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

Neglect and serious case reviews (PDF, 735KB) - nspcc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

parental learning disability<br />

Parental learning disabilities are rarely highlighted in <strong>serious</strong> <strong>case</strong> <strong>reviews</strong> although<br />

our analysis of these <strong>reviews</strong> has shown that there are often indications that parents<br />

had learning problems which were not assessed or addressed. The rigorous dem<strong>and</strong>s of<br />

these children’s highly complex health care needs present <strong>serious</strong> challenges to parents<br />

with a learning disability.<br />

parents struggling to keep up with medical care<br />

Despite initial attempts to address the child’s health needs, some parents soon began to<br />

struggle to care adequately for their child. This was often noticed through difficulties<br />

keeping up with numerous medical appointments. This was sometimes attributed to an<br />

overwhelming number of appointments with specialists <strong>and</strong> GPs; to a lack of transport,<br />

or difficulties balancing work <strong>and</strong> medical appointments. Some parents attended general<br />

medical appointments but failed to appear at specialist appointments, for example eye<br />

tests, or hearing aid fittings. There was a pattern of frequently rescheduled appointments<br />

which tended not to be kept.<br />

professionals shielding parents from children’s social care<br />

In several of the <strong>case</strong>s, hospital staff were concerned about the child’s development<br />

or growth, or suspected that the parent(s) were not properly administering the child’s<br />

medication long before the incident which prompted the SCR. Schools/nurseries likewise<br />

may have noted concerns over the child’s failure to grow or to socially engage with<br />

other children. In nearly all of these <strong>case</strong>s, however, staff did not share their concerns<br />

with CSC, sometimes in an attempt to shelter the family from further professional<br />

involvement, or due to a lack of awareness of what these concerns might mean.<br />

Some schools attempted referrals but filled in forms incorrectly or did not present the<br />

information cogently resulting in CSC rejecting the referrals prior to investigating the<br />

<strong>case</strong> further.<br />

tipping points in family circumstances<br />

3. A thematic analysis of neglect<br />

This small sample of medical neglect <strong>case</strong>s all displayed a negative turning point, or tipping<br />

point, in the child’s life connected to a specific change in the family’s circumstances.<br />

This was particularly true after the introduction of a new family member – either a new<br />

baby, or a new partner. Once this new family member arrived, the ill (or disabled) child’s<br />

needs were increasingly neglected. Sometimes the neglect was deliberate as in one <strong>case</strong><br />

where the child was forced to sleep outside in the garden shed, ostensibly because of<br />

bad behaviour, <strong>and</strong> was thus physically <strong>and</strong> symbolically excluded from the family. In<br />

other <strong>case</strong>s, neglectful care came in the form of lack of supervision as well as a failure<br />

to appropriately administer medication <strong>and</strong> attend to health needs.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!