29.03.2013 Views

WP 5 Analysis of present IWRM practices - Brahmatwinn

WP 5 Analysis of present IWRM practices - Brahmatwinn

WP 5 Analysis of present IWRM practices - Brahmatwinn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the output <strong>of</strong> the main industry branches. Using estimation method suggested by TAR Hydrology<br />

Bureau, the average water consumption <strong>of</strong> water per 10,000 Yuan industrial output is at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

400 m 3 yearly and the total amount consumption was about 86.84 million m 3 in TAR in 2006.<br />

There are four types <strong>of</strong> enterprises that consume a great lot <strong>of</strong> water and produce a lot <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

water. They are power plant, mining and dressing plants, cement plants and Beer Company:<br />

• Power Plant<br />

There were 107 enterprises <strong>of</strong> production and supply <strong>of</strong> electricity and thermal power in 2006. It is<br />

the largest industry sector in TAR. These enterprises generated 1515. 1 million Kwh <strong>of</strong> electricity and<br />

91 percent <strong>of</strong> electricity was generated by hydropower and about 5 percent (70 million Kwh) was<br />

generated by thermal power plant in 2006. The amount <strong>of</strong> water consumption by thermal power<br />

plant estimated (water consumption amount <strong>of</strong> per kwh = 3.36 kg) was 0.2352 million m 3.<br />

• Mining and Dressing Plant<br />

There were 71 unit enterprises <strong>of</strong> mining and dressing in 2006 and main mining production are<br />

chromium ore and borax ore but the output <strong>of</strong> borax has decreased significantly since 2000 for borax<br />

plants in China demanded little TAR natural borax. The output <strong>of</strong> chromium was 0.1217 million ton.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> water consumption estimated (water consumption amount <strong>of</strong> per ton <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong><br />

chromium ore = 6 ton) was 0.7306 million m 3 .<br />

• Cement Plant<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> cement reached 1.666 million tons in TAR in 2006, and the most <strong>of</strong> the cement<br />

products in TAR is produced by local plants. The amount <strong>of</strong> water consumption estimated (water<br />

consumption amount <strong>of</strong> per ton <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong> cement = 0.2 ton) was 0.332 million m 3 .<br />

• Beer Plant<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> beer was 63,280 tons in 2006 and reached 83,500 tons in 2007, a rise <strong>of</strong> 31.9 percent.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> water consumption estimated (water consumption amount <strong>of</strong> per ton <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong><br />

beer = 10 ton) was 0.835 million m 3 .<br />

Water quality in Brahmaputra river basin in TAR<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Brahmaputra river basin water quality in Tibet is generally good, man-made<br />

pollution is not prominent. Water quality in Brahmaputra River Basin depends on the geographical<br />

location (upper, middle or lower reaches in Tibet), location <strong>of</strong> land mines, and landforms. Water<br />

quality in dry season is better than that in rain season for sediment carried an amount <strong>of</strong> lead and<br />

cadmium in rain season. However, in the sites where water was polluted by thermal power plant<br />

sewage, like Yangbajing section <strong>of</strong> Doilung Qu River, water quality in rain season was better than that<br />

in dry season. For example, in 2000 and 2001, water quality in a length <strong>of</strong> 2883 km <strong>of</strong> river in<br />

Brahmaputra, including the main stream <strong>of</strong> the Brahmaputra and three first- level tributary, Nianchu<br />

River, the Lhasa River, and Niyang and two second-level tributary, Doilung Qu and Pasang Qu river<br />

were evaluated. In dry season, water quality in more than 97.4 percent <strong>of</strong> monitored river was better<br />

than level Ⅲ (slightly polluted), 0.1 percent at level Ⅲ and 2.5 percent lower than level Ⅲ. In rain<br />

season, water quality in more than 76.8 percent <strong>of</strong> monitored river was better than level Ⅲ (slightly<br />

polluted) and 23.2 percent lower than level Ⅲ.<br />

A more detailed overview is given in the Tab. 7: River water quality and waste water discharge<br />

monitoring in TAR from 2000 to 2007.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!