03.04.2013 Views

A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew

A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew

A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 MISNAIC HEBREW<br />

the view that MH was merely a Hebraized Aram., artificially<br />

created by the Schoolmen, like the Latin <strong>of</strong> the Middle Ages,<br />

and that it never had an independent existence as a natural medium<br />

<strong>of</strong> ordinary speech in the daily life <strong>of</strong> the Jews. This view rests,<br />

however, on a misconception <strong>of</strong> the whole character <strong>of</strong> MH.<br />

Far from being an artificial scholastic jargon, MH is essentially<br />

a popular and colloquial dialect. Its extensive literature does not<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> books composed by literary men in their study. It is<br />

rather a record <strong>of</strong> sayings, oral teaching, and discussions <strong>of</strong> men <strong>of</strong><br />

the people on a variety <strong>of</strong> subjects, embracing, practically, all the<br />

manifold activities in the daily life <strong>of</strong> an organized civilized society.<br />

Its vocabulary and its grammar both bear the stamp <strong>of</strong> colloquial<br />

usage and popular development. Apart from the technical<br />

phraseology <strong>of</strong> the specialized halaka, not a single trace can be<br />

discovered in it <strong>of</strong> that artificiality with which it has been credited.<br />

7. As to the alleged dependence <strong>of</strong> MH on Aram., a careful<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the grammar and vocabulary <strong>of</strong> MH as presented<br />

in the following pages will show that, while Aram, has undoubtedly<br />

influenced MH in many directions, it would be an exaggeration<br />

to describe this influence as a dependence <strong>of</strong> MH on Aram.<br />

In its morphology, MH is absolutely independent <strong>of</strong> Aram., and<br />

largely also in its syntax. In its main characteristics, the grammar<br />

<strong>of</strong> MH is practically identical with the grammar <strong>of</strong> BH. Where<br />

it differs from BH grammar, the genesis <strong>of</strong> the difference can<br />

generally be traced back to an older stage in the language, out<br />

<strong>of</strong> which the new forms developed in a natural way. Forms that<br />

deviate from the regular type <strong>of</strong> BH are usually found in BH in<br />

isolated cases as grammatical irregularities. It is nearly always<br />

possible to trace the connexion <strong>of</strong> a MH form with a BH proto­<br />

type, at least in later BH literature. If such forms in MH and<br />

late BH happen also to be found in Aram., they are usually also<br />

found in other Semitic languages, especially in a late stage <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!