04.04.2013 Views

1964 Awake! - Theocratic Collector.com

1964 Awake! - Theocratic Collector.com

1964 Awake! - Theocratic Collector.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHAT IS \\\\\\\\\1"<br />

LOOKED 1<br />

TO·ASIII '<br />

11111111111111111111 II<br />

o SCRUTINY<br />

Nof the foundation<br />

of modern-day religion would be<br />

thorough unless we examined the authority<br />

to which the religions look. Does not the<br />

quality of the foundation upholding a religion<br />

depend upon the authority to which<br />

it looks? Does not a weak authority mean<br />

a weak foundation? Hence a strong authority<br />

is needed, and not only must such a<br />

sound, strong authority be looked to, but<br />

it must be the authority; that is, its principles<br />

must actually be put into practice<br />

by its adherents.<br />

There are many forms of modern-day<br />

religion whose adherents vary from a<br />

small handful to thousands and even millions.<br />

To what authority do they look for<br />

support of their way of worship? How<br />

strong is that authority? Do they live by<br />

it? Does it give them a firm foundation,<br />

a good reason for their adherents putting<br />

trust in them? Let us examine what<br />

modem-day religion looks to as authority.<br />

Tradition as Authority<br />

It is frankly admitted that many groups<br />

rely heavily on tradition, which may be<br />

information, opinions, beliefs or customs<br />

handed down by word of mouth or by example.<br />

Traditions have their value; traditions<br />

in dress, eating habits and architecture<br />

have enriched men with variety. But<br />

APRIL !2, <strong>1964</strong><br />

not all tradition has proved beneficial.<br />

Though customs and information handed<br />

down in religion can be helpful, they often<br />

tend to be inaccurate. Especially with the<br />

lapse of time details of happenings are forgotten<br />

or distorted.<br />

It has<br />

been well said<br />

tha t not the<br />

least misfortune<br />

in a prominent<br />

falsehood is the<br />

fact that tradition<br />

is apt to repeat it<br />

for truth.<br />

We note, as an example, that The Catholic<br />

Encyclopedia, Vol. 15, page 6, says:<br />

"It is an old tradition that Jesus Christ<br />

was born on 25 December." But is that<br />

tradition accurate? The Bible does not give<br />

the exact date but does indicate Jesus'<br />

birth was before wintertime, while the<br />

shepherds were still out on their fields at<br />

night. It points to about October 1.· Tradition<br />

handed down December 25 because<br />

that date coincides with the pagan Roman<br />

Saturnalia and the birthday of the pagan<br />

sun-god Mithras. Thus tradition has perpetuated<br />

a falsehood.<br />

Tradition can also prove tyrannical.<br />

Speaking as the voice of men long dead,<br />

tradition may lay its "dead hand" on the<br />

living; and instead of serving from its place<br />

of vantage as a guide, it may take over<br />

the helm, leading one in the wrong direction.<br />

It may thus block progress, as in the<br />

case of creeds that are considered closed<br />

and not open to reason. Though it should<br />

be well known that man must check tradition<br />

by reason, too often man checks reason<br />

by tradition.<br />

It is little wonder, then, that some clergymen<br />

bemoan the fact that their religion<br />

rests too heavily on tradition, as did Bish-<br />

* For detailed proof see The Walchtower of December<br />

15. 1957, pp. 742, 743,<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!