Gene Cloning and DNA Analysis: An Introduction, Sixth Edition ...
Gene Cloning and DNA Analysis: An Introduction, Sixth Edition ...
Gene Cloning and DNA Analysis: An Introduction, Sixth Edition ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
294<br />
Part III The Applications of <strong>Gene</strong> <strong>Cloning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>DNA</strong> <strong><strong>An</strong>alysis</strong> in Biotechnology<br />
Next, the Ne<strong>and</strong>erthal sequence was aligned with the equivalent sequences from 994<br />
modern humans. The differences were striking. The Ne<strong>and</strong>erthal sequence differed<br />
from the modern sequences at an average of 27.2 ± 2.2 nucleotide positions, whereas<br />
the modern sequences, which came from all over the world, not just Europe, differed<br />
from each other at only 8.0 ± 3.1 positions. This degree of difference is incompatible<br />
with the notion that modern Europeans are descended from Ne<strong>and</strong>erthals. Similar<br />
results were obtained when mitochondrial <strong>DNA</strong> from a second Ne<strong>and</strong>erthal skeleton<br />
was examined. The results therefore provide an independent proof of the Out of Africa<br />
hypothesis, <strong>and</strong> show that, at least for Europe, the multiregional model is incorrect.<br />
16.4.2 <strong>DNA</strong> can also be used to study prehistoric human<br />
migrations<br />
The modern humans that displaced Ne<strong>and</strong>erthals arrived in Europe about 40,000 years<br />
ago. This is clear from the fossil <strong>and</strong> archaeological records. But were these humans<br />
themselves displaced by newer populations who migrated into Europe more recently?<br />
The spread of agriculture into Europe<br />
Some archaeologists have suggested that new populations of humans might have moved<br />
into Europe during the past 10,000 years, <strong>and</strong> that these humans brought agriculture<br />
into the continent. The transition from hunting <strong>and</strong> gathering to farming occurred in<br />
southwest Asia about 10,000 years ago, when early Neolithic villagers began to cultivate<br />
crops such as wheat <strong>and</strong> barley. After becoming established, farming spread into<br />
Asia, Europe, <strong>and</strong> North Africa. By searching archaeological sites for the remains<br />
of cultivated plants or for implements used in farming, two routes by which agriculture<br />
spread into Europe have been traced. One of these trajectories followed the<br />
Mediterranean coast to Spain <strong>and</strong> eventually to Britain, <strong>and</strong> the second passed along the<br />
Danube <strong>and</strong> Rhine valleys to northern Europe (Figure 16.10).<br />
One explanation for the spread of agriculture is that farmers moved from one place<br />
to another, taking with them their implements, animals, <strong>and</strong> crops, <strong>and</strong> displacing the<br />
indigenous, pre-agricultural communities that were present in Europe at that time.<br />
This wave of advance model was initially supported by archaeogeneticists, as it agrees<br />
with the results of a large phylogenetic study, carried out in the 1990s, of the allele<br />
frequencies for 95 nuclear genes in populations from across Europe. This dataset was<br />
analyzed by a technique often used in population genetics, called principal component<br />
analysis, which attempts to identify patterns in the geographical distribution of alleles,<br />
these patterns possibly being indicative of past population migrations.<br />
The most striking pattern within the European dataset, accounting for about 28% of<br />
the total genetic variation, is a gradation of allele frequencies running from southeast<br />
to northwest across the continent (Figure 16.11). This pattern suggests that a migration<br />
of people occurred either from southeast to northwest Europe, or in the opposite direction.<br />
Because the former migration coincides with the spread of farming, as revealed by<br />
the archaeological record, this first principal component was looked on as providing<br />
strong support for the wave of advance model.<br />
Using mitochondrial <strong>DNA</strong> to study past human migrations into Europe<br />
Principal component analysis has one weakness when applied to past human migrations.<br />
It is difficult to determine when a migration identified in this way took place.<br />
This means that the link between the first principal component <strong>and</strong> the spread of