Churchill, Palestine and Zionism, 1904-1922 - Douglas J. Feith
Churchill, Palestine and Zionism, 1904-1922 - Douglas J. Feith
Churchill, Palestine and Zionism, 1904-1922 - Douglas J. Feith
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
236 DOUGLAS J. FEITH<br />
are at our wits' end to find a single soldier," <strong>Churchill</strong> exclaimed to the<br />
foreign secretary. 68<br />
In November, General Congreve warned <strong>Churchill</strong> that, unless the<br />
garrison for eastern <strong>Palestine</strong> were increased, British forces would not<br />
be able to maintain order there. Congreve recommended as an economy<br />
measure that Britain exclude from the m<strong>and</strong>ate all of <strong>Palestine</strong> east of the<br />
Jordan River.69<br />
A few weeks later, <strong>Churchill</strong> wrote Lloyd George yet again to complain<br />
about the impossibility of reconciling the prime minister's dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />
for economy with his commitment to retain the new Middle Eastern<br />
m<strong>and</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> his antagonism to Turkey:<br />
It seems to me a most injurious thing that we, the greatest Mohammedan Empire<br />
in the world, sh[oul]d be the leading Anti-Turk power .... I deeply regret &<br />
resent being forced to ask Parl[iamen]t for these appalling sums of money for new<br />
Provinces-all the more when the pursuance of the Anti-Turk policy complicates<br />
<strong>and</strong> aggravates the situation in everyone of them, & renders cheapers [sic]<br />
solutions impossible. 70<br />
It seems to me a most injurious thing that we, the greatest Mohammedan Empire<br />
in the world, sh[oul]d be the leading Anti-Turk power .... I deeply regret &<br />
resent being forced to ask Parl[iamen]t for these appalling sums of money for new<br />
Provinces-all the more when the pursuance of the Anti-Turk policy complicates<br />
<strong>and</strong> aggravates the situation in everyone of them, & renders cheapers [sic]<br />
solutions impossible. 70<br />
CHURCHILL AND THE MIDDLE EAST DEPARTMENT<br />
War secretary <strong>Churchill</strong> quarreled with the foreign secretary over Turkey,<br />
the colonial secretary over Egypt, the India secretary over Mesopotamia,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the prime minister over all of the above. Substantive <strong>and</strong> jurisdictional<br />
disputes among the offices of these ministers were depriving British<br />
Middle East policy of even the semblance of coherence. Since the grim<br />
days of the previous summer, <strong>Churchill</strong> had been recommending creation<br />
of a new Middle East department within the government. On 31<br />
December 1920, the cabinet agreed. It located the new department within<br />
the colonial office. Lloyd George then offered his fractious friend <strong>Churchill</strong><br />
the job of colonial secretary. The latter agreed. Among his earliest<br />
68 See WSC IV 495. In a November 23, 1920, cabinet memor<strong>and</strong>um, <strong>Churchill</strong> wrote, "The<br />
burden of carrying out the present policy at Constantinople, in <strong>Palestine</strong>, Egypt, Mesopotamia<br />
<strong>and</strong> Persia is beyond the strength of the British Army <strong>and</strong> is producing most<br />
formidable reactions upon the Indian Army, upon which we are compelled to rely. I see<br />
the very greatest difficulty in maintaining that situation through the new financial year<br />
unless our military measures are aided by a policy of reconciliation <strong>and</strong> co-operation with<br />
the Turks <strong>and</strong> the Moslem world. It is far better to do this than to give up a province<br />
like Egypt, where we have been honourable [sic] established for so many years." WSC<br />
IV C 1250.<br />
69 See WSC IV 502-3. The population of eastern <strong>Palestine</strong> was 250,000 in 1920: WSC IV<br />
C 1260 n. 1.<br />
70 <strong>Churchill</strong> to Lloyd George, December 4,1920, in WSCIV C 1260-1 (emphasis in original).