24.04.2013 Views

CBM Progress Report 2006 - GSI

CBM Progress Report 2006 - GSI

CBM Progress Report 2006 - GSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CBM</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2006</strong> Simulations<br />

The goal of the <strong>CBM</strong> experiment is the investigation of<br />

the properties of compressed nuclear matter as produced in<br />

high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The main interest is the<br />

search for in-medium modifications of hadron properties<br />

and for the phase transition boundary between hadronic and<br />

quark-gluon matter at highest baryon densities.<br />

In heavy-ion collisions at relativistic energies, a large<br />

number of particles is produced. In central Au+Au collisions<br />

at 25 GeV/n, about 800 tracks are within the acceptance<br />

of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) of <strong>CBM</strong>.<br />

The reconstruction of such events, strongly kinematically<br />

focussed due to the fixed-target setup, is very challenging.<br />

Several track finding algorithms are currently being developed<br />

to cope with the extreme environment.<br />

In the Laboratory of High Energy (LHE) at JINR Dubna,<br />

a track finding algorithm based on the approximate solution<br />

of motion equation (ASME) for particles [1] has been developed<br />

with special focusing on the finding of secondary<br />

particles. This algorithm was tested for events of central<br />

Au+Au collisions at 25 GeV/n. The STS setup used consisted<br />

of two MAPS stations (d = 150 µm) at z = 10 cm and<br />

20 cm, two hybrid pixel stations (d = 750 µm) at z = 30 cm<br />

and 40 cm, and four micro-strip stations (d = 400 µm, z =<br />

50, 60, 75 and 100 cm). The single-hit efficieny was 99 %<br />

in the first two stations and 100 % in the others. The fake<br />

hit rate in the MAPS stations was 3 %, while the projective<br />

geometry led to a large number (80 %) of fake hits in the<br />

strip stations. Due to these reasons we have restricted ourselves<br />

to finding tracks with at least four consecutive hits<br />

in stations 2 - 6. With this constraint, the algorithm reconstructs<br />

∼ 600 tracks per event for physics analyses.<br />

efficiency<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

P (GeV/c)<br />

Track reconstruction in the <strong>CBM</strong>-STS<br />

O. Rogachevsky and A. Jerusalimov<br />

all<br />

primary<br />

secondary<br />

Figure 1: Track reconstruction efficiency as a function of<br />

momentum for all, primary and secondary particles<br />

JINR, Dubna, Russia<br />

5<br />

Figure 1 shows the track finding efficiency as a function<br />

of momentum. We obtain a good efficiency for primary<br />

particles with momenta above 0.5 GeV/c and a reasonable<br />

efficiency for secondary particles, allowing studies of longlived<br />

decaying particles.<br />

The relative momentum resolution obtained from the<br />

track fit is shown in Figure 2 as function of momentum.<br />

Its value is about 1.6 % roughly independent on momentum,<br />

thus demonstrating that it is dominated by multiple<br />

scattering in the STS detector material. A good resolution<br />

for the masses of decayed particle is achieved as well.<br />

P / P (%)<br />

Δ<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5<br />

P (GeV/c)<br />

Figure 2: Relative momentum resolution for all reconstructed<br />

tracks as function of momentum<br />

The algorithm is very fast (5 − 8 s per event) and the<br />

results obtained with it are promising. Further development<br />

of this algorithm is in progress.<br />

References<br />

[1] A. Jerusalimov: Reconstruction of track parameters in nonuniform<br />

magnetic field, http://www.gsi.de/Documents/DOC-<br />

2005-Jan-58.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!