30.04.2013 Views

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GEOMETRY A<strong>ND</strong> EXPERIENCE 239<br />

of course, be objected that a construction <strong>com</strong>posed of solid rods<br />

departs the more from ideal rigidity the greater its spatial extent.<br />

But it will hardly be possible, I think, <strong>to</strong> assign fundamental<br />

significance <strong>to</strong> this objection. Therefore the question<br />

whether the universe is spatially finite or not seems <strong>to</strong> me an<br />

entirely meaningful question in the sense of practical geometry.<br />

I do not even consider it impossible that this question will be<br />

answered before long by astronomy. Let us call <strong>to</strong> mind what<br />

the general theory of relativity teaches in this respect. It offers<br />

two possibilities:<br />

1. The universe is spatially infinite. This is possible only if<br />

in the universe the average spatial density of matter, concen·<br />

trated in the stars, vanishes, i.e., if the ratio of the <strong>to</strong>tal mass of<br />

the stars <strong>to</strong> the volume of the space through which they are scattered<br />

indefinitely approaches zero as greater and greater volumes<br />

are coruidered.<br />

2. The universe is spatially finite. This must be so, if there<br />

exists an average density of the ponderable matter in the universe<br />

which is different from zero. The smaller that average<br />

density, the greater is the volume of the universe.<br />

I must not fail <strong>to</strong> mention that a theoretical argument can be<br />

adduced in favor of the hypothesis of a finite universe. The<br />

general theory of relativity teaches that the inertia of a given<br />

body is greater as there are more ponderable masses in proximity<br />

<strong>to</strong> it; thus it seems very natural <strong>to</strong> reduce the <strong>to</strong>tal inertia<br />

of a body <strong>to</strong> interaction between it and the other bodies in the<br />

universe, as indeed, ever since New<strong>to</strong>n's time J gravity has been<br />

<strong>com</strong>pletely reduced <strong>to</strong> interaction between bodies. From the<br />

equations of the general theory of relativity it can be deduced<br />

that this <strong>to</strong>tal reduction of inertia <strong>to</strong> interaction between masses<br />

-as demanded by E. Mach, for example-is possible only if the<br />

universe is spatially finite.<br />

Many physicists and astronomers are not impressed by this<br />

argument. In the last analysis, experience alone can decide<br />

which of the two possibilities is realized in nature. How can<br />

experience furnish an answer? At first it might seem possible<br />

<strong>to</strong> determine the average density of matter by observation of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!