30.04.2013 Views

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

Brought to you By ND-Warez.info & WarezPoets.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHYSICS A<strong>ND</strong> REALITY 317<br />

semble of systems" in the sense of statistical mechanics. If,<br />

except for certain special cases, the 1jJ function furnishes only<br />

statistical data concerning measurable magnitudes, the reason<br />

lies not only in the fact that the operation of measuring introduces<br />

unknown elements, which can be grasped only statistically,<br />

but because of the very fact that the 1jJ function does not,<br />

in any sense, describe the state of one single system. The<br />

Schriidinger equation determines the time variations which are<br />

experienced by the ensemble of systems which may exist with<br />

or without external action on the single system.<br />

Such an interpretation eliminates also the paradox recently<br />

demonstrated by myself and two collabora<strong>to</strong>rs, and which relates<br />

<strong>to</strong> the following problem.<br />

Consider a mechanical system consisting of two partial systems<br />

A and B which interact with each other only during a<br />

limited time. Let the 1jJ function before their interaction be<br />

given. Then the Schriidinger equation will furnish the 'ljl function<br />

after the interaction has taken place. Let us now determine<br />

the physical state of the partial system A as <strong>com</strong>pletely as<br />

possible by measurements. Then quantum mechanics allows<br />

us <strong>to</strong> determine the 'ljl function of the partial system B from<br />

the measurements made, and from the 'ljl function of the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

system. This determination, however, gives a result which depends<br />

upon which of the physical quantities (observables) of A<br />

have been measured (for instance, coordinates or momenta).<br />

Since there can be only one physical state of B after the interaction<br />

which cannot reasonably be considered <strong>to</strong> depend on the<br />

particular measurement we perform on the system A separated<br />

from B it may be concluded that the 1jJ function is not unambiguously<br />

coordinated <strong>to</strong> the physical state. This coordination<br />

of several 1jJ functions <strong>to</strong> the same physical state of system B<br />

shows again that the 1jJ function cannot be interpreted as a<br />

(<strong>com</strong>plete) description of a physical state of a single system.<br />

Here also the coordination of the 1jJ function <strong>to</strong> an ensemble of<br />

systems eliminates every difficulty.·<br />

,.. A measurement on A, for example. thus involves a transition <strong>to</strong> a narrower<br />

ensemble of systems. The latter (hence also its '11 function) depends upon the<br />

point of view according <strong>to</strong> which this reduction of the ensemble of systems is<br />

carried ou t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!