r The Catholic Democracy of America,64 - Digital Repository Services
r The Catholic Democracy of America,64 - Digital Repository Services
r The Catholic Democracy of America,64 - Digital Repository Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Catholic</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>America</strong>, 43<br />
harbors <strong>of</strong> the Chesapeake, and there, too, Protestants were<br />
sheltered against Protestant intolerance."<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Catholic</strong> Church in the United States "<br />
refuse to give to the Calverts and their followers any credit<br />
for their principles <strong>of</strong> toleration:—<br />
" To gain entrance to Lord Baltimore's vast domains was necessary to<br />
believe in the divinity <strong>of</strong> Christ; but if, even with this restriction, the conduct<br />
<strong>of</strong> the founders <strong>of</strong> Maryland is the object <strong>of</strong> so much eulogy in <strong>America</strong>,<br />
we must claim our right to hesitate in joining in it. . . . When a<br />
State has the happiness <strong>of</strong> possessing unity <strong>of</strong> religion, and that religion<br />
the truth, we cannot conceive how the government can facilitate the division<br />
<strong>of</strong> creeds. Lord Baltimore had seen too well how the English <strong>Catholic</strong>s<br />
were crushed by the Protestants as soon as they were the strongest<br />
and most numerous; he should have foreseen that it would be so in Maryland,<br />
so that the English <strong>Catholic</strong>s, instead <strong>of</strong> finding liberty in <strong>America</strong>,<br />
only changed their bondage. Instead, then, <strong>of</strong> admiring the liberality <strong>of</strong><br />
Lord Baltimore,, we prefer to believe that he obtained his charter from<br />
Charles I. only on the formal condition <strong>of</strong> admitting Protestants on an<br />
equal footing with <strong>Catholic</strong>s."<br />
It is difficult to conceive that these words were written in the<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> <strong>America</strong>, by <strong>America</strong>n citizens, in the last<br />
quarter <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. It is fortunate for <strong>Catholic</strong>ism<br />
that the sagacious chiefs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>America</strong>n hierarchy<br />
have not shared this regret that the Roman <strong>Catholic</strong> Church<br />
was not established in perpetuity as a local sect, instead <strong>of</strong><br />
having become, by their wise policy, working freely in a free<br />
country, the most powerful religious community in the most<br />
prosperous nation <strong>of</strong> the world. Supposing that the founders<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Republic had favored this idea <strong>of</strong> local sectarianism<br />
and that <strong>America</strong> had become a nation notwithstanding,<br />
would these historians, for the sake <strong>of</strong> preserving <strong>Catholic</strong><br />
uniformity in Maryland, submit to arrest on crossing the<br />
Potomac at Harper's Ferry because the State <strong>of</strong> Virginia<br />
required subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles? Would<br />
they like to read in the Philadelphia "Ledger" how a Quaker<br />
and his wife from Pennsylvania had been hanged by the<br />
Independents on Boston Common as the penalty <strong>of</strong> a little<br />
tour in Massachusetts, which Puritan State, under the policy