Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page
Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page
Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Report No 678-F-001<br />
METSI CONSULTANTS: SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS FOR PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT<br />
10.7. PROPORTIONAL IMPACTS TO OVERALL POPULATION AT RISK AFFECTED<br />
Sections 10.4 to 10.6 above indicate the relative severity of the social and public and animal health risks per IFR<br />
reach. However, the number of people living in each of the reaches differs markedly, e.g., the PAR in Reach 6 is<br />
more than 20 times greater than that in Reach 2. In general, the distant reaches are more heavily populated than<br />
the proximal reaches. Table 10.5 compares the overall impacts translated into percentages of PAR affected.<br />
Table 10.5 Percentage of the overall PAR affected by different severity risks. In general terms the level of<br />
impacts are coded as follows: blue – negligible; green – low; yellow – moderate; purple – severe;<br />
red – critically severe.<br />
% of<br />
PAR Social<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Minimum Degradation Design Limitation Fourth Treaty<br />
Public<br />
Health<br />
Animal<br />
Health<br />
Social<br />
10.8. OTHER IMPACTS AND LOSSES<br />
Public<br />
Health<br />
Animal<br />
Health<br />
Social<br />
Public<br />
Health<br />
Animal<br />
Health<br />
Social<br />
Public<br />
Health<br />
Animal<br />
Health<br />
The IFR study did not exhaustively study or evaluate all possible consequences and effects of flow alteration in<br />
the rivers downstream of the LHWP structures. For reasons of time and cost constraints, emphasis has been<br />
placed on the key biophysical factors and on socio-economic issues selected on the basis of experience in the<br />
upper catchments of the LHWP (reservoir areas) as being important in a community and project development<br />
context.<br />
A potentially important item not specifically studied nor assessed is tourism. This is a development priority for the<br />
LHWP in particular and Lesotho in general but has not progressed because of a general lack of tourist<br />
infrastructure in the LHWP areas. Some downstream river reaches, e.g., IFR Reaches 5 and 8, have scenic river<br />
values of very high potential for future tourism. Although flow regulation would not directly impact on aesthetic<br />
values, a reduction in flows could potentially impact activities such as river rafting or fly-fishing.<br />
A second important item not specifically addressed is the intangible values associated with free-flowing rivers.<br />
The Senqu, Malibamats'o, Senqunyane, Matsoku and other rivers within the general zone of influence of the<br />
LHWP have great value as representatives of African high-elevation headwaters with intrinsically valuable<br />
55