07.05.2013 Views

Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page

Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page

Metsi Consultants - DWA Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report No 678-F-001<br />

METSI CONSULTANTS: SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS FOR PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT<br />

10.7. PROPORTIONAL IMPACTS TO OVERALL POPULATION AT RISK AFFECTED<br />

Sections 10.4 to 10.6 above indicate the relative severity of the social and public and animal health risks per IFR<br />

reach. However, the number of people living in each of the reaches differs markedly, e.g., the PAR in Reach 6 is<br />

more than 20 times greater than that in Reach 2. In general, the distant reaches are more heavily populated than<br />

the proximal reaches. Table 10.5 compares the overall impacts translated into percentages of PAR affected.<br />

Table 10.5 Percentage of the overall PAR affected by different severity risks. In general terms the level of<br />

impacts are coded as follows: blue – negligible; green – low; yellow – moderate; purple – severe;<br />

red – critically severe.<br />

% of<br />

PAR Social<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Minimum Degradation Design Limitation Fourth Treaty<br />

Public<br />

Health<br />

Animal<br />

Health<br />

Social<br />

10.8. OTHER IMPACTS AND LOSSES<br />

Public<br />

Health<br />

Animal<br />

Health<br />

Social<br />

Public<br />

Health<br />

Animal<br />

Health<br />

Social<br />

Public<br />

Health<br />

Animal<br />

Health<br />

The IFR study did not exhaustively study or evaluate all possible consequences and effects of flow alteration in<br />

the rivers downstream of the LHWP structures. For reasons of time and cost constraints, emphasis has been<br />

placed on the key biophysical factors and on socio-economic issues selected on the basis of experience in the<br />

upper catchments of the LHWP (reservoir areas) as being important in a community and project development<br />

context.<br />

A potentially important item not specifically studied nor assessed is tourism. This is a development priority for the<br />

LHWP in particular and Lesotho in general but has not progressed because of a general lack of tourist<br />

infrastructure in the LHWP areas. Some downstream river reaches, e.g., IFR Reaches 5 and 8, have scenic river<br />

values of very high potential for future tourism. Although flow regulation would not directly impact on aesthetic<br />

values, a reduction in flows could potentially impact activities such as river rafting or fly-fishing.<br />

A second important item not specifically addressed is the intangible values associated with free-flowing rivers.<br />

The Senqu, Malibamats'o, Senqunyane, Matsoku and other rivers within the general zone of influence of the<br />

LHWP have great value as representatives of African high-elevation headwaters with intrinsically valuable<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!