02.06.2013 Views

Guide to Documents Relating to French and British North America in ...

Guide to Documents Relating to French and British North America in ...

Guide to Documents Relating to French and British North America in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The most important calendar of the archives of Propag<strong>and</strong>a relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the his<strong>to</strong>ry of the United<br />

States is still be<strong>in</strong>g published by the Academy of <strong>America</strong>n Franciscan His<strong>to</strong>ry. Ten volumes have<br />

appeared <strong>to</strong> date, plus an Index for vols. 1-7. 48 Although edited by Kenneally, United States <strong>Documents</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> the Propag<strong>and</strong>a Fide Archives is mostly the work of the archivist. An<strong>to</strong>n Debevec, who s<strong>in</strong>gleh<strong>and</strong>edly<br />

found, translated, summarized <strong>and</strong> ordered all documents calendared. 49 Vol. 1 is prefaced by<br />

Kenneally, who expla<strong>in</strong>s the scope <strong>and</strong> the aims of the calendar. Then the <strong>in</strong>troduction, by An<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Tibesar, briefly surveys the his<strong>to</strong>ry of Propag<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> lists the ma<strong>in</strong> archival series of Propag<strong>and</strong>a,<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out the major difficulties encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g the early phase of research. (No other volumes<br />

of the First Series have <strong>in</strong>troductions).<br />

The seven volumes of the First Series (l622-c.1865) present 15,347 summaries ("letters") of<br />

documents. Each "letter" consists of a serial number, the numbers of the orig<strong>in</strong>al folios, the number<br />

<strong>and</strong> title of the archival volume conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the document, the document's title or the names of the<br />

writer <strong>and</strong> addressee, the date <strong>and</strong> place of orig<strong>in</strong>, a short summary of the contents, a list of the<br />

persons mentioned, <strong>and</strong> a note of the language used. The work of locat<strong>in</strong>g, read<strong>in</strong>g, translat<strong>in</strong>g, order<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> summariz<strong>in</strong>g the documents has been performed with great care.<br />

Nevertheless, some edi<strong>to</strong>rial choices are open <strong>to</strong> criticism. The tables of contents (except those<br />

of vols. 1 <strong>and</strong> 2) are useless. The <strong>in</strong>dexes that conclude each volume, <strong>and</strong> the general Index <strong>to</strong> vols.<br />

1-7, are <strong>in</strong>sufficient <strong>and</strong> sometimes <strong>in</strong>correct. A dist<strong>in</strong>ction should have been made <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dexes<br />

between those documents that were actually written or received by a person, <strong>and</strong> those <strong>in</strong> which the<br />

person is only mentioned. Anonymous letters (sometimes more important that the signed ones) <strong>and</strong><br />

letters of the apos<strong>to</strong>lic nuncios are listed only under the names of the persons mentioned (the nuncios,<br />

who were all archbishops, signed only by the name of their see, though sometimes add<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

Christian name); letters of the nuncios should mention the place of their appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>and</strong> their first <strong>and</strong><br />

family names. The <strong>in</strong>dices could have been exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude other items of significance, such as<br />

names of religious orders or dioceses. No abbreviations have been used, though there are many<br />

recurr<strong>in</strong>g words (bishop, archbishop, vicar apos<strong>to</strong>lic, nuncio, procura<strong>to</strong>r general, etc.), with consequent<br />

waste of much space. Cross-references are <strong>in</strong>complete or non-existent.<br />

Furthermore, on account of its geographical scope (the United States with<strong>in</strong> their modem-day<br />

borders), most of the documents deal<strong>in</strong>g with Canada were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Kenneally's calendar. As<br />

will be shown <strong>in</strong> Chapter Six, this is mislead<strong>in</strong>g. Until well <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the second half of the eighteenth<br />

century, there was no practical dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the <strong>French</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>British</strong> terri<strong>to</strong>ries of <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong>.<br />

Apart from these edi<strong>to</strong>rial flaws, this calendar is an important enterprise of great significance for the<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry of the Catholic church <strong>in</strong> the United States as well as for <strong>America</strong>n his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>and</strong><br />

completely supersedes Fish's <strong>Guide</strong>. S<strong>in</strong>ce this Calendar does not <strong>in</strong>clude documents deal<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

area of the United States that from 1622 <strong>to</strong> 1799 was under Spanish rule, these will be found <strong>in</strong><br />

Kenneally. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Kenneally's United States <strong>Documents</strong> presents only 529 entries relat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>French</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>British</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>in</strong> the years 1622-1799, compared <strong>to</strong> the 2,441 entries of the<br />

present Calendar.<br />

3. STUDIES<br />

I shall now describe a number of works written by his<strong>to</strong>rians who have used the archives of<br />

Propag<strong>and</strong>a <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>in</strong> the years 1622-1799. <strong>Documents</strong> published at r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>and</strong><br />

works only occasionally cit<strong>in</strong>g documents of Propag<strong>and</strong>a will not be discussed here, s<strong>in</strong>ce they do not<br />

stem from larger <strong>and</strong> consistent projects of research.<br />

One must surely beg<strong>in</strong> this survey by recall<strong>in</strong>g the collective work, entitled Sacrae<br />

Congregationis de Propag<strong>and</strong>a Fide Memoria Rerum, edited by Metzler, that was published between<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!