02.06.2013 Views

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SBE<br />

42<br />

Good Property Valuation in Emerging Real Estate Markets? Evidence from Ghana<br />

have limited amount of information<br />

about property transactions in Ghana.<br />

One reason is that the land registries are<br />

few, compared with the population of<br />

the country (about 25 million people).<br />

Also locating the registries in only<br />

regional capitals, although there are<br />

over 350 urban areas in Ghana (Owusu,<br />

2005) creates problems of accessibility<br />

for the majority of the urban population.<br />

The Chief Registrar of Land has noted<br />

several other reasons. The fees are<br />

deemed too expensive by most people,<br />

especially when they have to pay<br />

registration fees in addition to stamp<br />

duty. Also, the institutional capacity of<br />

the supporting land sector agencies is<br />

weak. Hence, the preparation of basic<br />

cadastral plans can take as long as 12<br />

months. Also a majority of people do<br />

not understand the need for so much<br />

paper work (Sittie, 2006). Further,<br />

there is some evidence (Aryeetey et<br />

al., 2007, pp. 50-51) that, contrary to<br />

claims by the Title Registry that it deals<br />

with cases in a fair and expeditious<br />

manner, there are delays, red tapeism<br />

and corruption plaguing the registry.<br />

Finally, even when information in the<br />

land registry is available to valuers,<br />

questions of how recent the data are<br />

may arise, as in how to use information<br />

registered in 1986, 1996, or even 2006<br />

for a valuation in 2011.<br />

In principle, the problem of lack of<br />

data may be ameliorated by using<br />

information from the processes of<br />

compulsory acquisition of landed<br />

property. In Ghana, the state often<br />

acquires the allodial interest through<br />

compulsory acquisition under the<br />

State Lands Act 1962 (Act 125),<br />

Administration of Lands Act 1962<br />

(Act 123), Statutory Way Leaves Act<br />

1963 (Act 182), or the current (1992)<br />

Constitution (Abdulai, 2010). Between<br />

1850 and 2004, the state executed<br />

1,336 instruments to compulsorily<br />

acquire land. It did so in all the ten<br />

regions of Ghana. The regions with<br />

the greatest share of compulsorily<br />

acquired lands were Greater Accra<br />

(34.1 per cent), Western (26.7 per<br />

cent), Ashanti (13.3 per cent) and<br />

Brong Ahafo (10.1 per cent) (Larbi<br />

et al, 2004, pp.121-1<strong>22</strong>). According<br />

to article 271 of the Constitution of<br />

Ghana, fair and adequate compensation<br />

must be provided promptly for any<br />

land that is compulsorily acquired. The<br />

principle of land law as established in<br />

Nii Kpope Tsuru v Attorney General<br />

and Nii Amotia v Ghana Telecom<br />

is that the requirement to make the<br />

payment of compensation condition<br />

precedent for compulsory acquisition<br />

has no retrospective effect. In earlier<br />

constitutions, the state had to pay<br />

compensation but it could do so after<br />

acquiring the land.<br />

So, the requirement to pay<br />

compensation whether pre- or post<br />

compulsory acquisition has long been<br />

established in Ghanaian land law.<br />

Evidently, that opens up an avenue<br />

to obtain information for valuation<br />

purposes. In valuation parlance, the<br />

usual basis of compensation is the<br />

deprival value concept or the notion<br />

that compensation is equivalent to<br />

how much it would cost to reinstate<br />

expropriated persons to the condition<br />

in which they were prior to losing their<br />

land (Johnson et al., 2000). Assuming<br />

the subject land was useful for farming,<br />

estimating compensation on this basis<br />

requires accounting for crops lost as<br />

well as incidental costs such as the<br />

cost of relocation. Often, contestations<br />

of the adequacy and fairness of<br />

compensation in land courts lead to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!