02.06.2013 Views

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (December 2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Footnote 43 in Cheung’s (1975) work<br />

states, “In a forthcoming book which<br />

investigates various rent controls in<br />

Hong Kong (Cheung, in progress),<br />

detailed evidence will be presented to<br />

confirm that premature reconstructions<br />

occurred in some tenements protected<br />

by the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance<br />

during the postwar period.” (Cheung<br />

1975: p.15) That book has not yet<br />

appeared. Cheung’s (1979) paper on<br />

housing reconstruction in post-war<br />

Hong Kong examines, among other<br />

things, 185 Land Tribunal cases heard<br />

from 1969 to 1972 in relation to s.11 (A)<br />

of the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance.<br />

In that later paper the focus shifts from<br />

reconstruction as a means used by the<br />

landlord to circumvent any rent cap to:<br />

(a) the landlord’s drive to<br />

reconstruct to minimise loss due<br />

to the introduction in 1962 of<br />

plot ratio control in the Buildings<br />

Ordinance, which reduced the<br />

permitted floor area; and<br />

(b) overcoming tenants<br />

who were holding out when<br />

landowners find it more<br />

profitable to redevelop<br />

In this latter regard s.11 (A), introduced<br />

in 1968 to allow private negotiation<br />

between landlord and tenant, was<br />

found useful in preventing premature<br />

redevelopment by overcoming the<br />

holding out problem.<br />

Cheung’s (1974) theory of price control<br />

covers all types of regulation of the<br />

market and thus one should appreciate<br />

that his (1979) case study demonstrates<br />

well the predictive power of his theory.<br />

Nonetheless, evidence remains wanting<br />

of pre-mature redevelopment intended<br />

<strong>Surveying</strong> and <strong>Built</strong> <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Vol</strong> <strong>22</strong>, 88-90 Nov <strong>2012</strong> ISSN 1816-9554<br />

only to by-pass rent control itself rather<br />

than any other form of control, yet<br />

that was nonetheless not a response to<br />

growing demand.<br />

In the light of this, we can turn to a<br />

University of Hong Kong dissertation<br />

by Lu (2007) on architectural<br />

conservation in Kadoorie Hill,<br />

developed and owned substantially by<br />

Hongkong Engineering & Construction<br />

Company Ltd., controlled by the<br />

famous Kadoorie family. This does<br />

provide real life, post-war evidence in<br />

support of Cheung’s (1975) theory of<br />

pre-mature redevelopment due to rent<br />

control.<br />

Lu’s (2007) dissertation recorded that<br />

the 1980 annual report of this company<br />

stated,<br />

“as prewar properties are not<br />

subject to the control of Landlord<br />

and Tenant (Consolidation)<br />

(Amendment) Ordinance 1980,<br />

the renewal rentals of the<br />

Company’s pre-war properties<br />

have been brought up to<br />

realistic levels as have other<br />

properties upon vacation by<br />

tenant...it has been decided not<br />

to proceed with the demolition<br />

and re-development of six of the<br />

Company’s small pre-war houses<br />

in Kadoorie Avenue...Instead,<br />

complete renovation of some<br />

of the houses is under active<br />

consideration.” (Lu, p.39 of the<br />

e-thesis)<br />

This is the public statement of a<br />

landlord in relation to rent control.<br />

This piece of information supports<br />

Cheung’s (1975) theory. One year<br />

earlier, the company had expressed<br />

worries about the adverse effects of a<br />

SBE<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!