mit_impact_full_report
mit_impact_full_report
mit_impact_full_report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
An Evolving MIT Internal Entrepreneurial Ecosystem<br />
56<br />
Impact of the MIT Entrepreneurship Center<br />
and Network<br />
Our 2003 MIT alumni survey sought measures of<br />
MIT-related factors that influenced the founding of<br />
the new companies. In Table 14, we show several<br />
dimensions that directly link to E-Center efforts.<br />
Clearly, MIT’s entrepreneurial network was seen as a<br />
critical influencing force even fifty years ago, but its<br />
strength has grown dramatically to the point that half<br />
of the most recent entrepreneurs see the network as<br />
a key factor in the founding of their companies.<br />
Appropriately, the MIT E-Center itself and the $10K-<br />
$50K-$100K Business Plan Competition have had<br />
essentially no perceived influence on alumni<br />
entrepreneurs until the past decade or so, when<br />
alumni have had the opportunity to engage with<br />
them. Prior to the founding of these two entities,<br />
only a few graduates of MIT classes had become<br />
connected with the E-Center, perhaps as E-Lab<br />
company CEOs or as $100K judges. But, during their<br />
relatively short lives, both the E-Center and the<br />
$100K have jumped into prominence as influences on<br />
those students who later became company founders.<br />
Other survey results indicate that the more recent<br />
alumni entrepreneurs, in particular, see extracurricular<br />
and social activities as accounting for the team<br />
formation of about 60 percent of the new firms, with<br />
an increase in the percentage of the startup ideas<br />
also coming from networking. The growth of classes,<br />
clubs, conferences, and their informal spinoffs has<br />
altered the internal environment of MIT relating to<br />
these entrepreneurial movements.<br />
Bob Metcalfe ’68, Ethernet inventor, founder of<br />
3Com, and now a partner in Polaris Ventures, is a<br />
constant observer of MIT. “It’s not just that MIT’s<br />
entrepreneurial environment flourishes under its<br />
institutional com<strong>mit</strong>ment to technology transfer,” he<br />
said. “It’s also that MIT includes both ‘nerds’ and<br />
‘suits.’ Divergent life forms, yes, but necessary to and<br />
working together at MIT on entrepreneurial<br />
innovation. And what keeps MIT’s entrepreneurial<br />
ecosystem accelerating is that nobody is in charge.<br />
There are at least twenty groups at MIT competing to<br />
be the group on entrepreneurship. All of them are<br />
winning.” Testimony supporting this effect also is<br />
presented by the 2003 results shown in Table 15.<br />
There we see that, over five decades, the importance<br />
of faculty and research to new enterprise creation has<br />
been vital, but more or less constant, whereas the<br />
perceived influence of other students on venture<br />
founding has grown enormously, to the point that it<br />
is the dominant single perceived influencing factor<br />
found in our studies. The internal network of<br />
relationships, especially student-to-student, has<br />
become king!<br />
Technology Licensing Office<br />
The history of the MIT Technology Licensing<br />
Office traces the evolution of the MIT entrepreneurial<br />
culture and ecosystem. In 1932, the MIT Com<strong>mit</strong>tee<br />
Table 14<br />
Entrepreneurship Center Factors Important to Venture Founding (from li<strong>mit</strong>ed sample only)<br />
Proportion Rating University Factors as Important in Venture Founding* (percentage)<br />
Graduation Decade 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s<br />
(N=73) (N=111) (N=147) (N=144) (N=145)<br />
MIT Business Plan Competition 0% 1% 0% 3% 30%<br />
MIT Entrepreneurship Center 3% 1% 2% 1% 12%<br />
MIT’s Entrepreneurial Network 26% 25% 32% 40% 50%<br />
*Respondents could check all relevant categories<br />
ENTREPRENEURIAL IMPACT: THE ROLE OF MIT