1 - the Envirostor

March 22, 1988
I . Ciifton W. Davenport
California Department of Health Services
5850 Sheilmound, Suite 100
Emeryville, CA 94608
Dear Mr. Davenport:
Draft Final Report
Bay Area Drum
Expedited Response Action
Canonie Envlronmentai Sewices Corp.
1825 South Grant Sheet
Suite 260
San Matea, California 94402
Mione: 415-573 8012
Enclosed is one copy of the Draft Final Report, Bay Area Drum Expedited
Response Action, for your review.
If you have any questions, please contact us at (415) 573-8012.
Very truly yours,
Claude Carlos White, Jr.
Assistant Project Engineer
Richard J. Ereenwood, P.E.
Project Manager
Enc.

LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF APPENDICES
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Site Background
1.3 Implementation
2.0 IMPLEMENTATION
2.1 Mobilization and Site Setup
2.1.1 Mobilization
2.1.2 Site Setup
2.1.3 Daily Records
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.2 Phase I Demolition and Drum Yard Preparation
2.2.1 Demolition
2.2.2 Additional Excavation and Drum Removal
2.2.3 Utility Protection
2 .2.4 Site Grading and Surface Preparation
2.2.4.1 Soil Excavation
2.2.4.2 Drainage Ditch Excavation
2.2.4.3 Equipment Decontamination
2.2.4.4 Placement of Cover
2.2.4.5 Orphan Drums
2.2.4.6 Preparation of Roll-Off Boxes
PAGE
i
i i
iii
1
1
1
2
5
5
5
6
7
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Cont i nued)
2.3 Removal of Liquids and Sludges
2.3.1 Sludge Tank
2.3.2 Boiler Tank
2.3.3 Sump and Dip Tanks
2.3.4 Worker Protection
2.4 Phase I1 Demo1 ition and Residential Yard Preparation
2.4.1 Demolition
2.4.2 Surface Preparation
2.5 Soil Excavation and Backfill Placement
2.5.1 Site Clearing and Grading
2.5.2 Excavation
2.5.3 Loading, Transportation and Disposal
2.5.4 Backfill Placement
2.6 Cap Construction
Liner Placement
Concrete Placement
Drainage Pipe
Permeable Sand
Geotextile Pi acement
Gravel Placement
Paving of the Driveway and Surface Chip Seal
2.7 Fence Reconstruction
2.8 Drum Hand1 ing and Disposal
2.9 Compatibility Testing
2.10 Winterization and Demobilization
- PAGE
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
16
16
17
17
18
19
19
20
20
20
2 1
2 1
21
2 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
- PAGE
3.0 TRANSPORTATION PLAN 23
3.1 Introduction 23
3.2 Implementation 23
4.0 SITE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY 24
4.1 Introduction 24
4.2 Revisions to the Health and Safety Plan 24
4.3 Key Personnel and Their Responsibilities 24
4.4 Job Hazard Analysis 26
4.4.1 Physical Hazards 26
4.4.1.1 Noise 27
4.4.1.2 Heat Stress 27
4.4.1.3 Construction Equipment 2 7
4.4.1.4 Uneven Terrain 2 7
4.4.1.5 Unstable Stacking of Containers 28
4.4.1.6 Manual Material Handling 28
4.4.1.7 Confined Spaces 28
4.4.2 Chemical Hazards 28
4.5 Air Monitoring 29
4.5.1 Air Monitoring During Liquid Removal Activities 29
4.5.2 Air Monitoring During Soil Excavation Activities 33
4.5.2.1 Summary of Excavation Activities 33
4.5.2.2 Direct Reading Instrumentation 34
4.5.2.3 Integrated Sample Collection and Analysis 38
4.6 Personal Protective Equipment 39

REFERENCES
TABLES
FIGURES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
4.7 Decontamination Procedures
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
4.7.1 Personal Decontamination
4.7.2 Equipment Decontamination
4.8 General Site Health and Safety and Work Rules
4.9 Training
4.10 Medical Monitoring
4.11 Work Zone and Site Security
4.11.1 Exclusion Area
4.11.2 Decontamination Area
4.11.3 Support Area
4.11.4 Site Security
4.12 Community Health and Safety
- PAGE
40
40
4 1
41
42
42
43
43
43
44
44
44

TABLE
NUMBER
LIST OF TABLES
Subcontractor List
Summary of Hazardous Waste Disposal
Employee Air Monitoring Coll ection Summary
Ambient Air Monitoring Collection Summary
Employee Air Monitoring Analytical Results
Ambient Air Monitoring Analytical Results

-
-
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE DRAWING
NUMBER NUMBER TITLE
1 87-035-E8 Project Schedule
2 87-035-E5 Phase I Staging and Site Working Area
3 87-035-E6 Phase I1 Staging and Site Working Area
4 87-035-B10 Drum Hand1 i ng Site Plan

APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
LIST OF APPENDICES
As-Built Construction Drawings
Test Results for Compliance with
Technical Specifications
Laboratory Test Results
HDPE and Geotextile Fabric Instal 1 ation
Procedures

The goal of the ERA was to rapidly reduce and mitigate public and
environmental exposure to potentially harmful contaminants. The California
Department of Health Services (DHS) had determined, based on the Public
Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (PHERA), that the ERA was
necessary to protect the public health and to limit risks of continued
exposure due to potential time delays from the Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and Remedial Planning Process. The objectives of
the ERA were the following:
1. Reduce potential direct contact of people with contaminated soil
in residential and vacant lots on the south and east sides of the
site and within the drum yard;
2. Reduce potential future environmental degradation from
contaminated surface water runoff;
3. Remove contaminated materials, tanks, and drums that might have
presented the potential for future off-site contamination or
further degradation of the environment;
4. Reduce the hazard of potentially contaminated airborne dust;
5. Reduce the potential for further degradation of the groundwater
beneath the site from infiltration of precipitation or runoff.
1.3 Imolementation
The work required to implement the ERAS was performed by Canonie's contract
team or their subcontractors. A list of subcontractors is provided in
Table 1. The actual progression of activities and the schedule for any
remaining activities are provided as Figure 1.

The work performed included nine major components:
1. Mobilization and site setup;
2. Demol i tion and disposal of drums, tanks, miscellaneous scrap
metal, fencing, and debris from the drum yard;
3. Excavation, grading, and placement of soil cover within the drum
yard;
4. Demol ition and disposal of fencing, sheds, concrete, and other
miscellaneous debris from the residential lots;
5. Excavation and disposal of soil from residential lots;
6. Backfill and compaction of excavated areas;
7. Construction of site cap and construction of surface drain system
and retaining structures;
8. Reconstruction of wood fencing;
9. Winterization of site.
The work was performed under the direction and supervision of DHS. During
the course of the site activities, numerous additional activities were
required to enhance the construction work and to further protect the public
from health risks due to exposure. These additional activities included:
1. Increased levels of personal protective equipment by workers;
2. Removal of buried drums and debris;
3. Excavation of additional contaminated soil ;

4. Additional testing of drums and contaminated soil;
5. Working overtime hours to complete critical work tasks;
6. Mobilization of additional equipment and supplies necessary to
meet the additional project requirements;
7. Air monitoring and air sample testing;
8. Construction of additional surface water control and drainage
features.
Although the time required to complete the work increased due to weather
conditions and increased work activities, the project was completed in a
timely fashion and fulfilled the goal and purpose of the ERA.

2.0 IMPLEMENTATION
As presented in Section 1.0 of this report, the work covered under the
scope of activities included nine major components. The work required by
these components was carried out in accordance with the technical
specifications, the procedures outlined in Section 2.0, the Transportation
Requirements of Section 3.0, and the Health and Safety Requirements of
Section 4.0.
Some of the specifications and procedures presented in the technical
specifications and work plan were modified as required by field conditions.
These modifications were made after the necessity for change was determined
by the Construction Superintendent and after approval was given by the
Project Manager. All modifications were authorized by the DHS Project
Officer.
2.1 Mobilization and Site Setuo
2.1.1 Mobilization
Mobilization of personnel, equipment, materials, and supplies was carried
out as was necessary to meet the requirements of the technical
specifications and included the specific items and personnel identified and
presented in the work plan and reported in the financial reports of the
project. Mobilization of these items was performed just before use.
Transportation of equipment, materials, and supplies to the site was along
the local routes specified in Section 3.0 of the Work Plan.
Delivery dates and arrivals for equipment, materials, supplies, and
personnel were based upon work progress. Materials and supplies were
stored prior to use within the site building in the areas indicated on
Figure 2. Equipment was stored within the fenced area near the work being
performed by that equipment.

2.1.2 Site Setuo
During site setup procedures, portions of the fencing within the
residential lots were removed and temporary fencing was placed at the
approximate locations shown in Figure 3. In addition, temporary fencing
was placed around the perimeter of the site and a pedestrian walkway was
constructed outside of the primary site security fencing. The excavation
was sealed off from the residential lots by using temporary fencing lined
with visquene.
Because of the temporary nature of the site fencing and the risk of public
exposure, full time security was maintained at the site. These security
measures were necessary to prevent access to the site by non-authorized
personnel and thereby reduce public exposure and protect onsite supplies
and equipment.
During setup procedures, the office areas within the building, areas used
by construction personnel, and areas used for material/supply storage were
cleaned. Cleaning of the office consisted of boxing all materials, papers,
and debris for future DHS review. All debris, equipment parts, and tanks
outside the office and within the area required for storage were moved to
other portions of the building outside the storage area. These materials
were handled under the same level of protection as presented in Section 4.0
of this report.
During preparation of the work plan and during site setup activities, the
City of San Francisco was contacted for the purpose of determining permit
procedures and requirements. Due to the nature of the work (hazardous
waste removal) normal permit procedures did not apply, and confusion
developed concerning the type of permitting that would be required.
Because of the permit conditions and requirements, delays to the project
and increased work requirements resulted. The changes to the schedule are

shown in the project schedule (Figure 1). Costs associated with these
activities and remobil ization costs are reflected in the project financial
reports.
2.1.3 Dailv Records
A daily record of activities of the work performed was prepared and
submitted periodically to the DHS Project Officer. The reports gave the
number and type of personnel, the equipment used, and a description of the
work performed. These forms were available for inspection by the DHS
Project Officer between submittals.
2.2 Phase I Demo1 ition and Drum Yard Preoaration
2.2.1 Demolition
This section covers the work performed to clear and remove all concrete,
rubble, weeds, debris, timbers, scrap metal, fencing, posts, sheet metal,
gates and drums within the drum yard. This work was performed as required
by Sections 02020, 02102, and 01037 of the technical specifications or as
described herein.
Prior to implementation of the ERAS by Canonie, DHS contacted the former
operator of the BAD facility and arranged to remove many of the drums and
equipment from the drum yard area. This work was performed before final
pricing of the Canonie work, and reduced costs were reflected in the
authorized amount in the task order.
All material within the drum yard with the exception of the boiler tank and
the open-top sludge tank was collected by laborers, operators and a Case
580 backhoe. The backhoe was equipped with a backhoe arm and bucket and a
1 oader bucket.

All materials not resting on the ground surface were removed from their
existing locations with the backhoe arm and bucket. The backhoe loader
bucket then picked up these materials and placed them into roll-off boxes.
Materials which could not be picked up with the backhoe were picked up by
hand and then loaded into the backhoe loader bucket for placement into the
roll-off boxes. Occasionally, due to the size and shape of the debris,
hand loading into the roll-off boxes was required. After these loading
operations were completed, the surface of the drum site was scraped with
the backhoe bucket and small bulldozer, and small debris and rubble was
collected and loaded into a roll-off box.
All personnel performed the demolition work under the level of protection
specified in Section 4.7 of this report. Before any activity for debris
removal and site grading, the ground surface was moistened to reduce the
creation of and exposure to dust.
2.2.2 Additional Excavation and Drum Removal
During demo1 ition of the wood fencing dividing the drum yard and the vacant
lot, several drums were uncovered beneath the surface of the drum yard.
Upon further investigation (excavation along the fence1 ine) additional
drums were found with capacities of about 30 gallons and filled with fluids
and gravel. These drums were excavated using the Case 580 backhoe, placed
in empty 55-gallon drums, and then stored inside the building.
During excavation of the drums Health and Safety personal protective
equipment was upgraded to Level B protection. In addition to the drum
removal, additional contaminated soil within this area was also removed.
2.2.3 Utility Protection
The utilities identified within the drum yard were above ground power
poles, their guide wires, monitoring wells, and an underground gas 1 ine.
During site construction activities, equipment maintained a safe distance

from all power 1 ines, monitoring wells, guy wires, and gas lines. All work
performed near any utilities was done by hand, if it was felt that safe
distances could not be maintained with construction equipment. In
addition, a protective casing made of cinder blocks was placed around the
monitoring well in the vacant lot to prevent damage during fill operations.
During the course of the work, one gas line not previously located was
uncovered and struck by the backhoe bucket. PG&E was notified, and after
an inspection, indicated that no damage to the line had occurred.
Accordingly PG&E authorized completion of the backfill operation.
2.2.4 Site grad in^ and Surface Preoaration
The site grading and surface preparation within the drum yard was performed
concurrent with demolition operations and as was required by Section 02232
of the technical specifications or as specified herein. Activities for
site grading included:
o Excavation of soil required to bring the existing surface of the drum
yard to grade;
o Excavation of drainage ditch areas;
o Equipment decontamination;
o Placement and compaction of three inches of cover material;
o Placement and lining of roll-off boxes.
Subgrade preparation and protection complied with Section 02232,
Subsections 3.1 and 3.3 of the technical specifications.
2.2.4.1 Soil Excavation
The excavation of soil in the drum yard needed to bring the surface to the
required grade was performed using the Case 580 bucket and a CAT D-3
bulldozer (equivalent).

A grid system was established along the curbs and the building, and the
surface of the yard was surveyed periodically to control elevation
requirements. Surveying was performed after excavation, subgrade
preparation, and backfilling. Excess material over that required to grade
the site was stockpiled on the surface of the drum yard. This stockpiled
material was loaded into trucks during removal of residential soils and in
accordance with the procedures presented in Section 2.5 of the Work Plan.
Drums containing drill cuttings, which had been transferred from the drum
yard to the building, were brought back out to the stockpile, opened and
dumped into the pile. The emptied drums were then carried back into the
building. The emptied contents were disposed with the residential soils.
2.2.4.2 Drainaqe Ditch Excavation
Excavation of the drainage ditch areas conformed to Section 2200, and to
the As-built Construction Drawings in Appendix A of this implementation
report. The position of the ditch along Thomas Street was altered slightly
to accommodate two monitoring wells. This excavation was performed with
the backhoe and dozer. Grade was checked and controlled by periodic
surveying.
All materials excavated in the drainage ditch area were stockpiled for
disposal along with the residential soils. Use of hand tools and labor was
required to protect utilities during construction.
2.2.4.3 Eouipment Decontamination
Equipment used during Phase I work was decontaminated when this equipment
was required to cross between contaminated areas and noncontaminated areas,
and when site grading operations were completed.
The decontamination was performed by placing plastic in an area between the
contaminated area and the noncontaminated area. The equipment was then
driven slowly onto the plastic, steam cleaned, and then driven slowly onto
the noncontaminated area. The steam cleaning water was allowed to drain

off the plastic onto the drum yard. This water helped in dust suppression
and contributed to moisture content for compaction. All workers wore
safety glasses, PVC rain pants or polycoated Tyveks, and rubber boots
during steam cleaning operations.
2.2.4.4 Placement of Cover
After the site grading and drainage ditch excavation, a three-inch
(compacted thickness) lift of fill material was placed over the drum yard.
This cover was graded by Esquivel Grading and Paving and was compacted by
Canonie personnel. The fill was placed to provide a clean surface for
operation of equipment and personnel, to cover any sharp objects or other
protrusions which might affect the performance of the liner, and to provide
a roadway surface between the vacant lot and the drum yard. The cover
material was dumped in the vacant lot and then spread with the dozer to the
required thickness. The cover material met the specifications for fine
fill of Section 2200, Subsection 2.5 of the technical specifications. The
results of compliance testing are provided in Appendix B.
Once the cover material had reached the drum yard, a test section for
compaction was constructed. The purpose of the test section was to verify
that the compaction required by Section 02200, Subsection 1.4.1 could be
achieved by compacting the cover surface.
2.2.4.5 Orphan Drums
During this phase of implementation, fifteen 55-gallon drums were left in
the street outside the Hawes Street gate. These drums were brought into
the drum yard where they were inspected by the DHS Enforcement Division.
The drums were then moved inside the building. Samples were taken from the
drums, tested by Canonie and profiled by CWM, or sent to DHS laboratories.

2.2.4.6 Preoaration of Roll-Off Boxes
The roll-off boxes were lined with 5-mil thick plastic sheets before
placement of any waste materi a1 s.
2.3 Removal of Liauids and Sludqes
To expedite the removal process, samples of the liquid and sludge materials
for the on-site tanks and the sump were obtained before implementation of
the work plan. The samples were obtained and tested for compatibility and
chemical content. Chemical compatibility testing conformed to the testing
requirements as outlined in Section 2.10. Chemical content testing was
performed as required for the determination of the disposal profile and for
acceptance by the Kettleman Hills disposal facility. The results of these
tests are provided in Appendix C.
2.3.1 Sludae Tank
The liquids were removed from the sludge tank by being pumped into 55-
gallon drums. After pumping, solids and sludges were removed and placed
into 55-gallon drums using the Case 580 backhoe with a twelve-inch bucket.
The outside surface of the 55-gallon drums were sheathed in plastic so that
this surface would be kept clean. The drums were placed in a berm
constructed of plastic sheeting and absorbant in case spillage occurred.
Residual sol ids were removed by hand excavations. After cleaning, the tank
was loaded with yard debris, placed on a flatbed truck, and transported to
the Kettleman Hills disposal facility. The tank was picked up by a crane
with steel cables wrapped around each end of the tank and connected in the
middle. The cables were then secured to the lifting arm of the crane and
the tank was lifted onto the truck.
2.3.2 Boiler Tank
The 1 iquid from the boiler tank was collected into 55-gallon drums. The
liquid was drained through a valve at the bottom of the tank and into 5-

gallon buckets. These buckets were then emptied into 55-gallon drums.
After the liquids from the boiler tank had been removed, the boiler tank
was lifted onto a truck and transported to Levin Scrap for metal salvage.
2.3.3 Sumo and Dio Tanks
The liquids from the sump area and dip tanks (inside the building) were
removed in the same way as liquids from the sludge tank.
2.3.4 Worker Protection
During liquid removal operations and cleaning of the inside
materials/supply storage areas and sump areas, all workers wore protection
equipment as required by Section 4.7 of this report. In addition, all work
was performed under the direction of a construction supervisor with
demonstrated experience in similar operations.
2.4 Phase I1 Demo1 ition and Residential Yard Preoaration
2.4.1 Demolition
This section covers the work that was required to clear and remove all
concrete rubble, weeds, debris, timbers, scrap metal, fencing, posts,
trees, shrubs, and the structure (woodshed) within the work area. This
work was performed as required by Sections 02020, 02102, and 01037 of the
technical specifications or as described herein.
All material within the residential lots was handled or otherwise collected
using laborers, operators and a Case 580 backhoe. The backhoe was equipped
with a backhoe arm and bucket and a loader bucket.
All materials not resting on the ground surface, with the exception of the
trees, shrubs, and weeds, were removed from their existing location by the
backhoe arm. The material was then picked up by hand and loaded into the
loader bucket. The backhoe then transported the materials to the roll-off

ox marked "nonhazardous materials" (prepared according to Section 2.2.3).
Any materials that were stained or otherwise considered hazardous were
separated from nonhazardous materials and loaded into roll-off boxes marked
as "hazardous materials. " Table 2 provides a summary of the hazardous
materials which were transported off-site.
Trees and shrubs were cut flush with the ground surface, loaded into the
loader bucket, and placed into the nonhazardous roll -off boxes. All
personnel performed the demo1 i tion work under levels of protection required
by Section 4.7. Before performing any activities during debris removal and
excavation operations, the surface of the ground was moistened to reduce
creation of and exposure to dust.
2.4.2 Surface Preoaration
After demolition operations, a three-inch lift of fill material was placed
by Canonie and graded by Esquivel Grading and Paving over the drum yard
surface. The material was placed to provide a clean surface for operation
of equipment and personnel. An additional thickness of fill was placed as
required to produce a level surface for operation of excavation equipment.
The cover material was dumped in the vacant lot and spread by the bulldozer
until the required thickness and a level surface were achieved. The
surface of the fill was compacted only as necessary to allow operation of
equipment over the surface.
2.5 Soil Excavation and Backfill Placement
2.5.1 Site Clearinq and Gradinq
Site clearing and grading was performed before excavation ofdesignated
soils with procedures similar to those outlined in Section 2.2. This work
was performed using equipment and personnel as presented in Section 5.0 of
the Work Plan or as shown in the project financial reports.

2.5.2 Excavation
The excavation of designated soils and buried debris was performed to meet
the requirements of Section 02200, Subsection 3.1 of the technical
specifications, or as specified herein. Equipment used to perform the work
is listed in Section 5.0 of the Work Plan and/or in the project financial
reports, and as is outlined in this section. The soil was excavated and
placed directly into waiting dump trucks and transported to the disposal
facility along the route presented in Section 3.0. Soils were dampened as
necessary to reduce the potential for exposure to dust particles during
excavation operations.
Cut slopes within the excavated areas were maintained at slopes no steeper
than 1H:lV or as was required by safety and as designated by the on-site
engineer and approved by the site Health and Safety Officer.
The excavation began in Yard 3. To prevent spillage, the backhoe excavated
the soil keeping the bucket not more than three-quarters full of soil. The
backhoe rotated in a counter clockwise direction (toward the drum yard) and
placed the material in the truck.
The truck was backed up directly beside the backhoe to limit the distance
the material was carried before placement. Once the truck was loaded, the
plastic 1 iner (placed in the truck before loading) was folded over the
material and securely tied down. The truck would then leave the area
through the drum yard as shown on Figure 3.
The excavation proceeded away from Yard 3. When there was no longer enough
room for the trucks to maneuver behind the backhoe, the trucks entered by
the Hawes Street entrance and parked alongside the backhoe as shown on
Figure 3. When the backhoe reached the edge of the building, it turned and
proceeded into the vacant lot. Any areas of contaminated soil which could
not be excavated with the backhoe were removed by hand.

After the excavation had been completed, the bucket areas of the backhoe
arm that came in contact with the contaminated soil were steam cleaned over
a plastic berm. This rinsate was collected in a 55-gallon drum. Air
monitoring was performed prior to and during the excavation operation. The
procedures and results of the air monitoring are provided in Section 4.5.
2.5.3 Loadinq. Transoortation and Disoosal
Excavated soil was loaded directly into waiting dump trucks (as described
in Section 2.5.2) for transportation to the disposal facility. The
equipment and personnel used to perform these tasks were as provided for in
Section 5.0 of the Work Plan and/or listed in the project financial
reports. Transportation of loaded soils was carried out in accordance with
the transportation plan provided in Section 3.0 of the Work Plan.
During the excavation activities, the presence of vinyl chloride was
suspected because of air monitoring results. Increased Health and Safety
precautions, project standby time, and other delays resulted during the
period that the presence or absence of vinyl chloride was being evaluated.
The procedures and results of the air monitoring for vinyl chloride are
presented in Section 4.5.
Laboratory analyses on the soils for determination of vinyl chloride are
provided in Appendix C.
2.5.4 Backfill Placement
Backfill operations were performed as required by Section 02200 of the
technical specifications or as described herein.
Backfilling began in the vacant lot, where the deep PCB pit was first
brought up to the same grade as the excavation in the residential lot.
Backfill soil in the vacant lot was placed in 8-inch thick lifts and

compacted with the backhoe bucket and by wheel rolling. Compaction near
foundations and monitoring wells was performed with a hand-held Wacker
rammer-type compactor.
From the vacant lot the backfill operations proceeded into Yard #1, and
then into Yards #2 and #3. The backfill soil was pushed in front of the
backhoe so that the backhoe was only in contact with the clean imported
soil .
In the vacant lot and in the residential lots, the backfill soil below a
depth of two feet from finish grade was common fill, as described in
Section 02200, Subsection 2.4. Between the depths of 1 foot and 2 feet,
the backfill soil was topsoil as described in Section 02200, Subsection
2.1, compacted by wheel rolling. At depths from finish grade to 1 foot,
the backfill was uncompacted topsoil.
The trench separating the vacant lot from the drumyard was backfilled using
common fill. This soil was placed in 12-inch lifts and was compacted by
using the backhoe bucket and by wheel rolling.
2.6 Cao Construction
The placement of the HDPE Synthetic Membrane was performed as required by
Sections 02200, 02232, 02400, 03300, and 07114 of the technical
specifications except that the precleaning of the existing concrete slab
and sump areas was performed before final site grading and cap placement.
The concrete slab shown in Figure 2 was scraped with the Case 580 backhoe
and was then steam cleaned. Steam cleaning water was allowed to flow onto
the ground surface.
2.6.1 Liner Placement
The synthetic 1 iner was supplied and the instal lation supervised by Nilex
USA, Inc. All submittals required by Section 07114, Subsection 1.5 and

1.6, Section 07115, Subsection 1.4 and 1.5, specific methodology for liner
placement field scanning, and placement of boots for monitoring wells,
telephone poles, guide wires, fence posts, and other structures penetrating
the liner were prepared by Canonie with cooperation and information from
Nilex. This information was submitted to DHS two weeks before liner
installation and is included as Appendix D.
Upon delivery, the HDPE liner was stored in the area shown on Figure 4.
When it was determined that the drum yard subgrade was completed, the liner
was removed from the storage area and placed onto the drum yard using an
extended arm crane. The 1 iner was rolled out and placed into position by
laborers. A Nilex field technician then fused the sheets of HDPE together
as per the working details that Nilex had provided. Nilex suggested that a
better seal around the monitoring wells could be achieved if the concrete
utility boxes were replaced with sono tubes. This would allow the
performed pipe boots to be used instead of using a field weld. This method
was determined to be acceptable by Canonie, DHS, and CH2M HILL so long as
the utility boxes were replaced and accessiblity to the monitoring wells
maintained. Plans were made for utility box replacement so that the sono
tubes could be used.
Field vacuum testing and laboratory destructive testing of the liner seams
were performed. Any seams that proved to be inadequately welded were re-
welded and tested again to insure their integrity.
2.6.2 Concrete Placement
The placement of the concrete curb and catch basin conformed to Section
03300 of the Construction Specifications and as is shown on the
construction drawings. The concrete curb was placed and allowed to cure
five days before placement of final subsurface cover material and HDPE
liner. The existing curb around the sump was removed and the sump
backfilled with concrete so that the newly constructed curb could be
extended over the sump. After the curb had been cured, the HDPE liner was
fastened to the curb with Hilti concrete anchorages.

The concrete catch basin was purchased from the Santa Rosa Cast Products
Company. The catch basin was installed after the placement of the liner.
Tommy Lee of the San Francisco Department of Public Works (SFDPW) was
present during the placement of the basin and approved the basin connection
to the city sewer system.
2.6.3 Drainaqe Pioe
The drainage pipe was installed after completion of the liner installation.
All pipe was installed as required by the construction drawings and
according to Section 02400 of the technical specifications, except for the
length of pipe running parallel to Thomas Street. Because of the position
of the monitoring wells, this section of pipe was positioned five feet from
the curb instead of the three feet as originally provided by the plans.
2.6.4 Permeable Sand
Samples of the sand required for placement above the liner were obtained
and tested as required by Section 02200 of the technical specifications.
The results of these tests were provided to DHS before delivery of the sand
to the site and are included in Appendix B.
The sand was end-dumped in the vacant lot and spread (full thickness) with
the backhoe. The sand was completely spread over the liner but compaction
was not completed until winter rains had subsided and the sand had dried.
After the sand had dried sufficiently, the grade was checked and some
additional sand was added and distributed with a Bobcat where needed.
Compaction of the sand was performed with hand-held vibrating plate
compactors. Water was added as necessary to achieve the compaction
required.
In order to prevent subgrade ponding at the drain inlet prior to the
completion of the cap seal coat, holes were drilled into the side of the
drain box beneath the drain box inlet and above the synthetic membrane.

2.6.5 Geotextile Placement
Geotextile fabric was placed as required by Section 07115 of the technical
specifications and as described herein. Correspondence from the
manufacturer provided additional instructions regarding storage, handling
and installation, and is included in Appendix D (James M. Cramer, Vice
President, Nilex USA Inc., California Branch, letter dated February 13,
1988). Following the manufacturer's instructions, the seams of the
geotextile were not bonded, but were overlapped two feet to provide proper
continuity of the fabric.
2.6.6 Gravel Placement
The Class 2 aggregate base layer for the top 6 inches of the cap was placed
as required by Section 02200 of the technical specifications. The
aggregate was dumped and spread with a Massey Ferguson loader and compacted
with a Bomag 100 roller. Moisture was added as required to achieve proper
compaction. The base was spread and compacted so that the trucks always
ran over the compacted base and did not disturb the liner. Compaction
around the wells, fence tubes and Christy boxes was achieved with a hand-
held Wacker rammer-type compactor.
2.6.7 Pavinq of the Drivewav and Surface chi^ Seal
Paving of the driveway and installation of the chip seal coating on the cap
was performed as required by Sections 02510 and 02605 of the technical
specifications. Inspection of the site after rainfall indicated that
drainage from the site was working effectively and no ponding was evident.
Some additional work was performed to protect the DHS monitoring wells on
site and provide ease of access to these wells. Christy boxes were
installed around five monitoring wells within the cap area, flush with the
final grade. Structural concrete was used to cement inside the box and
bring the well grout back up to final grade.

Other additional work was performed to control drainage and prevent surface
runoff from getting under the liner at the edge of the drum yard. Asphalt
concrete berms were installed at several locations. These included the
following: adjacent to the Bay Area Drum and machine shop/plating shop
buildings; across the former driveway and across the asphalt walkways by
the building and machine shop; and between the drum yard and the vacant
1 ot.
2.7 Fence Reconstruction
Because of rain delays, only Phase I of the fence reconstruction was
performed. Phase I reconstruction included replacing the fences in the
residential lots and placing the sono tubes in the drum yard area. This
work was performed after placement of the three inches of cover over the
drum yard and the excavation and backfilling of the residential lots.
Phase I fencing was provided and installed by With Fencing, Inc. according
to Section 02445 of the technical specifications.
Sono tubes were placed using a hand auger or the Case 580 backhoe.
Excavated soils were collected and disposed of with the residential soils.
The excavated area around each sono tube was backfilled with fine soil and
compacted with a hand-held Wacker rammer-type compactor.
Final permanent fencing work is expected to be completed in the near
future.
2.8 Drum Handlina and Disoosal
Drum handling and disposal will be performed at a later I date.
2.9 Comoatibilitv Testinq
Compatibility testing will be performed at a later date.

2.10 Winterization and Demobilization
Winterization of the site was performed to prevent rain damage to the site
during the seasonal rains.
Site winterization consisted of sealing the site against rainwater
infiltration, securing the site against outside intrusion, and removing
rainwater that had collected in the building.
To protect the site from rain, visquene was placed over the street curb to
liner joint, the HDPE liner was completely covered with sand, the sono
tubes were sealed with visquene and duct tape, and plywood was propped over
the gap between the building and the concrete containment curb.
The site perimeter was secured by placing temporary fencing along the
backyard of the Madison residence, by wiring shut the gap in the Shafter
Street access gate, and by securely locking all site doors and gates.
Samples of water were collected from the drum storage area inside the
building and sent to DHS laboratories for chemical analyses. These results
have been forwarded to Tommy Lee of the SFDPW. A temporary sump pump has
been placed in the drum storage area, and Mr. Lee has approved the
discharge of any water collected into the city sewer system.

3.1 Introduction
3.0 TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The transportation phase of the Bay Area Drum ERA was critical in that it
represented the portion of the project which had, although limited, the
greatest potential for public exposure outside of the immediate project
area. Therefore, Canonie had developed a plan for loading and
transportation of the hazardous waste to the Kettleman Hills disposal
facility with the assistance of Chemical Waste Management, Enrac Division
(CWM) and DHS. In the development of this plan, Canonie had considered
issues of personnel and pub1 ic safety, regulatory compliance, and
operational efficiency. The plan was presented in Section 3.0 of the Work
Plan.
3.2 Imolementation
During implementation of the ERA for Bay Area Drum, the transportation plan
was followed. No spill or need for emergency response occurred during the
performance of the work.

4.1 Introduction
4.0 SITE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY
The work performed in implementing the Health and Safety Plan was designed
as a practical approach to accomplishing the ERA activities considering the
occupational and public health hazards anticipated at the site. The Health
and Safety procedures applied to all site activities carried out under the
Expedited Response Action (ERA) at the BAD site.
All on-si te personnel, enforcement agency personnel, and visitors were
required to familiarize themselves with and comply with provisions of the
Health and Safety Plan. Canonie provided health and safety equipment for
Canonie employees and subcontractors. All other personnel provided equal
or greater levels of protection for themselves.
4.2 Revisions to the Health and Safety Plan
Because conditions varied, the original plan presented in Section 4.0 of
the work plan was upgraded and downgraded, as appropriate, depending on
site conditions. All changes to the Health and Safety Plan were determined
or approved by the site Health and Safety Officer and discussed with the
Project Officer.
4.3 Kev Personnel and Their Res~onsi bil ities
The following list names the key personnel who were assigned to the project
for implementation of the ERA. Details of their experience and technical
levels were provided in Appendix C of the work plan. Additional personnel
required to implement the ERA were determined after approval of the work
plan and pricing proposal and before performance of the work required by
such personnel.

1. Richard J. Greenwood, P.E.: Mr. Greenwood was the Canonie project
manager; he was responsible for the overall project management
including the Health and Safety Plan.
2. Jack Isley: Mr. Isley was the project construction manager and
was responsible for technical assistance during handling of
hazardous materi a1 s.
3. Keith Pushaw: Mr. Pushaw was the project construction
superintendent and was responsible for review of profiling and
disposal procedures and for verification of all work in accordance
with state and Federal requirements for disposal of hazardous
wastes. Mr. Pushaw was also responsible for preparation and
review of drum handling and compatibility testing procedures.
4. Arlen Saxton: Mr. Saxton was the project construction supervisor
and was responsible for on-site activities including handling of
hazardous materials; he was directly responsible for personnel
compliance with the Health and Safety Plan; Mr. Saxton is
certified in first aid and CPR and was designated as agent to
notify paramedics and the fire department in the event of an
emergency.
5. Brian Hickam and Mike Endicott: Mr. Hickam and Mr. Endicott were
the project construction foremen. They were responsible for
assisting the project work, for directing project laborers, and
for taking over the responsibilities of the project supervisor in
the event that Mr. Saxton was not available.
6. Michael Strebeck: Mr. Strebeck is a Level 3 professional and
assisted in the project during the course of the work. Mr.
Strebeck's responsibilities were to act as the agent for the
project manager in the event that the project manager was not
available.

James Babcock: Mr. Babcock is a Level 4 professional and assisted
in the project during winterization activities and completion of
the site cap. Mr. Babcock's responsibilities were to act as the
agent for the project manager in the event that the project
manager was not available.
Susan Walker: Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) : Ms. Walker
was the site Health and Safety Officer; she was responsible for
implementation and management of the site Health and Safety Plan.
Kurt Ahlich: Mr. Ahlich was responsible for on-site quality
control, maintaining site records, and engineering activities
required during field activities.
Albert Elizondo: Mr. Elizondo is a Level 2 professional and
assisted in the project during winterization activities and
completion of the cap. Mr. Elizondo's responsibilities were to
assist in completion of the work and assist Mr. Ahlich in his
responsibilities.
Michael Klein: Mr. Klein is a Level 1 professional and assisted
in the project during the course of the work. Mr. Klein's
responsibilities were to assist Mr. Ahlich in his
responsibilities.
4.4 ~ o Hazard b Analysis
4.4.1 Phvsical Hazards
The major physical hazards at the site included the following:
1. Noise
2. Potential heat stress
3. Construction equipment
4. Uneven terrain

5. Unstable stacking of containers (inside building)
6. Manual material handl ing
7. Drum handl ing
8. Drum overpacking operations
9. Potential exposure to vinyl chloride
4.4.1.1 Noise
Where excessive noise was encountered, employees were provided with E.A.R.
ear plugs.
4.4.1.2 Heat Stress
All on-site personnel were instructed in the symptoms of heat stress.
Where site conditions warranted, the site Health and Safety Officer
monitored for heat stress. Potable water was available on-site, and
Gatorade was provided as needed.
4.4.1.3 Construction Eouioment
Trucks, excavation equipment, and drum handl ing equipment were issued at
the site. On-site personnel were made aware of the presence of this
equipment. All personnel operating such equipment were made aware of the
presence of other site personnel. Backup alarms and roll -over protection
were used, as appropriate. The excavation area was examined by a utilities
locator.
Personnel operating construction equipment were experienced in the
operation of such equipment and continuous supervision was provided during
the operation of that equipment.
4.4.1.4 Uneven Terrain
All open excavations and ground openings were protected from inadvertent
entry. Any openings left open overnight were barricaded and covered to

prevent entry by off-site personnel. Security guards were provided during
off-hours to prevent entry by off-si te personnel.
4.4.1.5 Unstable Stackinq of Containers
Drums were stacked inside the building. All employees were warned to
approach these areas with caution. No one was permitted to walk or climb
on drums. Any obviously unstable drums were restacked or otherwise moved
to eliminate the potential of falling.
4.4.1.6 Manual Material Handling
Wherever possible, material handling was done mechanically. Fork1 ift
trucks for drum handling were used on-site. Where manual handling was
necessary, personnel were instructed in techniques of safe handling.
4.4.1.7 Confined Soaces
The drainage sump, sludge tank, dip tanks, and boiler tank were pumped
and/or cleaned during site activities. Entry into sump, sludge tank, dip
tanks, or boiler tank was required during cleaning. Confined space entry
and monitoring procedures were implemented during these activities, as
described in Section 4.5.
4.4.2 Chemical Hazards
Chemical hazards were encountered during the excavation activities and in
handling unknown materials found in containers on-site. The drum yard
soils were considered to be contaminated to varying degrees. All personnel
wore steel toed neoprene boots while working in the yard. Kneeling and/or
sitting directly on the ground was prohibited. Special procedures,
including air monitoring and upgrading of health and safety protection
levels, were implemented during excavating, cleaning and drum hand1 ing
activities.

4.5 Air Monitoring
4.5.1 Air Monitorinq Durinq Liquid Removal Activities
The air monitoring at Bay Area Drum consisted of organic vapor
concentration determination using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA).
Monitoring was done at the beginning of each work activity to evaluate
potential exposure levels. The chemical constituents of the liquids to be
removed had previously been identified as styrene, methylene chloride, and
C3benzene.
Styrene has a threshold limit value of 50 ppm for an eight-hour time
weighted average. The threshold limit value for methylene chloride is
being lowered to 50 ppm, and it is considered a suspect carcinogen.
C3benzene has not had a threshold limit value established by the American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. None of these compounds
are readily absorbed through the skin.
Work at the Bay Area Drum facility was initiated on August 20, 1987. The
OVA was calibrated using zero hydrocarbon air and methane in air at 6.7
ppm. The background readings obtained outside the fence and upwind of the
site indicated 3.6 ppm.
The first activity, pumping the liquids from the open tank, was monitored.
The personal protective equipment worn by the employees was Level C with
full face Scott respirators, chemical-resistant gloves (inner and outer),
polytyveks, and rubber boots. The OVA readings during this activity were
as follows:
Pum~inq Tank
Outside plastic sheet 3.6
Above drum 70
Above tank 20

Later in the day the OVA was re-calibrated and background established at
1.6 ppm. The next activity was the pumping of the sump. The same level of
protection, previously noted, was utilized by the employees. The OVA
readings during this activity were as follows:
Pumoinq sum^
Top of sump
Above drum
Concentration (om)
The next activity to be monitored involved the shoveling of the sludge in
the sump. Re-calibration of the OVA was not possible due to a low battery.
All activity was stopped and postponed until the next day.
On August 21, 1987, the work activity centered on the shoveling and steam
cleaning of the sump. The level of protection utilized was Level C. The
OVA was calibrated and the background level established at 2.5 ppm. All
employees noted an odor through their respirator at the beginning of the
shoveling activity. Re-adjustment of the respirator face piece alleviated
the problem. The OVA readings during the day were as follows:
40
3.0
Shovelinq Sumo Concentration (porn1
Top of sump 4.2
Shovel ing to bucket 2 5
Bucket transfer to drum 82
Removing motor 11
Sludge trap inside 70
Steam Cleanins Sumo Concentration (oomr
Inside trap 150
Outside 40
Due to the extremely high moisture content in the air during the steam
cleaning operation, the OVA readings are not considered val id.

On August 24, 1987, the removal of the sludge from open tank was begun. A
backhoe with a small bucket attachment was utilized to fill the drums. The
OVA was calibrated and background was established at 2.0 ppm. The
protection levels initially were set for the employee guiding the sludge
from the backhoe bucket to the drums at Level B with an airline respirator,
polytyveks, chemical-resistant gloves (inner and outer), and rubber boots.
The other employees were at Level C with a full face respirator. The OVA
readings during this activity were as follows:
Cleaninq Tank Concentration (om)
Above tank 4.2
Above tank after breaking
sludge crust 400
Inside barrel berm-top of
barrel 70-150
Backhoe operator seat 4.2
Outside barrel berm 5.0
Following this evaluation, the protection levels for the backhoe operator,
forklift operator, and the barrel steam cleaner were downgraded to a
modified Level D with polytyveks, rubber boots, chemical -resi stant gloves
(inner and outer), and a hardhat with faceshield. The employee guiding the
sludge from the backhoe bucket to the drums remained at Level B.
Additional OVA readings were obtained throughout the day and the ranges
obtained were as follows:
Cleaninq Tank Concentration ( om1
Above tank 400-500
Inside barrel berm-top of
barrel 50-150
Outside berm 3-5
On August 25, 1987, the work activity of cleaning the tank continued with
the same protection levels as the previous day. The OVA readings were as
follows:

Cleaninu Tank Concentration (om)
Above tank
Inside barrel berm - top
of barrel
Outside berm
Backhoe
Some final clean up in the sump area was also conducted. The employees
wore Level C with a full face respirator for this activity. The OVA
readings were as follows:
Cl eanina Sumo Concentration (ooml
Outside sump area
Sump trap inside
During the day, it became necessary for an employee to enter the open tank
to shovel the residual sludge into the backhoe bucket. Confined Space
Entry procedures were utilized for this activity. The employee entering
the tank wore an airline respirator with an escape bottle, saranex suit,
rubber boots, chemical-resistant gloves (inner and outer), and a safety
harness with a safety line attached. A stand-by observer was equipped with
a SCBA, saranex suit, rubber boots, and chemical-resistant gloves (inner
and outer). The OVA was re-cal i brated and the background established at
0.8 ppm. The OVA readings obtained were as follows:
Tank Entry Concentration (o~rn)
Above tank
Outside berm
Backhoe
After lunch, cleaning inside the tank continued with the same level of
protection as noted above. Upon completion of the sludge removal, the
inside of the tank was steam-cleaned. The OVA was re-calibrated and the
background established at 2.0 ppm. The OVA readings were as follows:

Tank Entry Concentration (oom)
Above tank 200
Outside perimeter of tank 5.0
Backhoe 2.0
Inside barrel berm - top of barrel 120
Outside berm 2.0
Above tank - after steam clean 5.0
During the tank entry activities, two employees, Jeff Buhl and Scott
Freiwald, experienced direct skin contact with the sludge material. A
small area on their neck and jaw indicated contact. The sludge was washed
off with water. Since the known constituents are not readily absorbed
through the skin, this contact would not be considered a significant source
of exposure.
The final activities during the liquid removal phase of this project
involved the pumping of the liquid from a trough inside the building and
the draining of the water from the boiler tank. The OVA reading for both
operations were at background 1 eve1 s.
4.5.2 Air Monitorinq Durinq Soil Excavation Activities
4.5.2.1 Summarv of Excavation Activities
During the week of October 5, 1987, air monitoring was conducted at the Bay
Area Drum site. The site activities during this time period included
uncovering of buried drums, excavation of contaminated soi 1 s, and grading
of site yard. Direct reading instrumentation, consisting of an Organic
Vapor Analyzer (OVA) and Draeger tubes for vinyl chloride were utilized at
various steps throughout the activities. In addition, integrated ambient
air samples were obtained from the site perimeter. Personal exposure
monitoring of employees was conducted based on their assigned job func-
tions. The ambient and employee samples collected were full duration
samples and the results are considered time weighted averages.

The integrated samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory which
maintains certification by the American Industrial Hygiene Association, the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the Environ-
mental Protection Agency.
The direct reading instrumentation indicated potential exposure to vinyl
chloride monomer based on the Draeger tube length of stain. With this
indication, personnel protective equipment was upgraded to minimize the
potential exposure. The Draeger tube method is subject to several
interferences and is not considered as accurate as the integrated samples.
The integrated samples were specific for determining airborne concentra-
tions of vinyl chloride monomer, polychlorinated biphenyl, lead, and total
dust. The analytical results indicated no detectable levels of vinyl
chloride or polychlorinated biphenyl on any of the ambient or personal
samples. One sample indicated a measurable concentration for lead. This
sample was obtained along the southern perimeter fence on the final day of
3
activity monitoring. The result reported was 0.004 mg/m . All the remain-
ing samples submitted for lead analysis indicated no detectable levels.
Several of the samples analyzed for total dust concentrations reported
detectable concentrations. For those samples which did indicate total dust
3 3
concentration, the range was reported between 0.1 mg/m and 0.6 mg/m .
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has established
Permissible Exposure Limits for occupational exposure to each of the in-
tegrated sample analytes. In all instances the reported concentration
levels were well below the permissi ble exposure 1 imits.
4.5.2.2 Direct Readinq Instrumentation
The direct reading instrumentation used during the excavation phase at Bay
Area Drum consisted of an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) and Draeger tubes
for vinyl chloride. The range for the vinyl chloride tubes was 0.5 parts
per million (ppm) to 6 ppm with 10 pump strokes.

On Friday, October 2, 1987, old drums which were buried along the east side
of the yard were uncovered. The OVA was calibrated using zero hydrocarbon
air and methane at 6.7 ppm. Background level was established outside the
exclusion area and upwind of the site. Background level was 1.8 ppm. OVA
reading and vinyl chloride tubes evaluated levels before and during the
removal of the buried drums.
Above drums -
prior to removal 1.8
Above open drum 1.8
East pit - after some drums
removed and fresh soil
uncovered 3.0
Leaking drum 3.0
East pit - after drums removed 3.0
General yard 1.8
Sump area 3.2
OVA Vinyl Chloride
Concentration (porn1 Concentration (oomr
None detected
None detected
0.5
None detected
None detected
N/A
N/A
During the drum removal activities the protection levels utilized were
Level C, with full face Scott respiratory protection, chemical resistant
gloves (inner and outer), rubber boots, hard hat, and polytyveks for the
employee in the pit hooking up the drums and the employee unhooking the
drums. The remaining personnel on site utilized Level D protection with
boots, tyveks, gloves, and hard hats.
On Monday, October 5, 1987, the activities centered around preparing for
excavation and grading of the general yard area. No OVA or vinyl chloride
Draeger tubes were used. All employees in the yard area wore Level D
protection with boots, tyveks, gloves and hard hats. Dust suppression
methods were employed during the grading activities.

On Tuesday, October 6, 1987, the excavation activities started. The OVA
was calibrated using zero hydrocarbon air and methane at 6.7 ppm. Back-
ground was established outside the exclusion area and upwind of the site.
Background level was 1.0 ppm. During the majority of the day, the OVA did
not register any significant levels above background in the area of excava-
tion or the general yard. When the excavation started along the building
foundation, the employee providing dust suppression to the excavation
reported a strong odor. Excavation activities were stopped while OVA and
Draeger tube readings could be obtained.
OVA Vinyl Chloride
Concentration Imml Concentration (~oml
Foundation 2 5 6.0
Top of excavation pit None detected None detected
Based on the positive detector tube reading, it was determined that further
excavation would be continued with continuous reading being taken at the
top of the excavation pit near the backhoe operator. Due to the moist
soil, it was determined that dust suppression during excavation would be
discontinued. For the remainder of the day, the OVA reading at the top of
the excavation pit did not indicate any sustained levels above the
background level of 1.0 ppm. Instantaneous levels up to 1.4 ppm were
noted. The level of protection utilized was Level D with boots, tyveks,
gloves, and hard hats.
On Wednesday, October 7, 1987, the excavation activities continued. The
OVA was calibrated using zero hydrocarbon air and methane at 6.7 ppm.
Background was established outside the exclusion area and upwind of the
site. Background level was 1.5 ppm. Continuous OVA readings were taken at
the top of the excavation pit. The initial protection level for the back-
hoe operator was Level D with boots, tyveks, gloves, and hard hats. When
the OVA registered sustained levels of 1 ppm above background, in this
instance 2.5 ppm, a Draeger tube reading for vinyl chloride was taken. The

-
.- -
Draeger tube indicated a vinyl chloride level of 0.5 ppm at the top of the
excavation pit. The protection level for the backhoe operator was upgraded
to Level B with boots, tyveks, gloves, hard hat and airline respirator.
The remaining employees kept away from the excavation pit. The OVA was
used to establish a line when the levels were reported at the background
1 eve1 .
A survey of the yard during grading indicated a sustained level of 4 ppm on
the OVA. A Draeger tube for vinyl chloride indicated that no detectable
vinyl chloride was in the grading area. The protection level for grading
the yard remained at Level D with boots, tyveks, gloves, and hard hats.
The truck loaded with excavated material was checked with the OVA. The
level indicated 7.5 ppm. A vinyl chloride Draeger tube taken in the same
area of the truck indicated 1 ppm.
At the end of the day's activity, the OVA reading at the top of the
excavation was at background and a Draeger tube for vinyl chloride
indicated no detectable level.
On Thursday, October 8, 1987, the excavation activities continued. The OVA
was calibrated using zero hydrocarbon air and methane at 6.7 ppm.
Background was established outside the exclusion area and upwind of the
site. Background level was 2.3 ppm. Continuous OVA readings were taken at
the top of the excavation pit. The initial protection level for the
backhoe operator was Level D with boots, tyveks, gloves, and hardhat. When
the OVA registered sustained levels of 3.3 ppm, the protection level for
the operator was upgraded to Level B with the addition of airline
respiratory protection. The remaining employees were kept away from the
excavation pit by establishing a 1 ine where the OVA readings were at
background level s.
A survey of the yard identified one area where the OVA readings were at
14.3 ppm. The vinyl chloride Draeger tube reported no detectable level.

The equipment operator and the employee providing dust suppression were
required to upgrade their protection level to Level C with boots, gloves,
tyveks, hard hat and a half-mask respirator with organic vapor cartridges
and a dust pre-filter. The area was re-evaluated an hour later with the
OVA. The levels reported were 5.3 ppm. At this time, the employees
working in this area were advised that the continued use of the respiratory
protection was optional.
At the end of the day's activity, the OVA reading at the top of the
excavation pit was at background levels.
On Friday, October 9, 1987, the excavation activities were completed. The
last part of the contaminated soil was stockpiled to await transportation.
The stockpile was covered with plastic and backfill material. The OVA was
calibrated using zero hydrocarbon air and methane at 6.7 ppm. Background
was established outside the exclusion area and upwind of the site.
Background level was 1.6 ppm. Readings taken surrounding the covered
stockpile were reported at background levels. The level at the top of the
excavation pit was also at background.
A series of soil samples were collected in the excavation pit. The
protection level utilized during collection was Level B with boots, hard
hat, chemical resistant gloves (inner and outer), tyveks, and airline
respiratory protection.
After the samples were collected, the excavation pit was backfilled with
clean fill material.
4.5.2.3 Intesrated Sam~le Collection and Analysis
The sampling procedures utilized corresponded with specific National Insti -
tute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) methods for collection.
The pumps used to collect the samples were Gilian models. The pumps were
calibrated prior to and after sample collection. Calibration methods were

ased on a primary standard of volumetric displacement using a buck
calibrator with the appropriate sample media in the sample train. Each
pump was fully charged prior to monitoring.
The ambient sample stations were located along the temporary fence sur-
rounding the site. The west fence station was approximately halfway be-
tween the building and the end of the yard on Thomas Street. The southern
fence station was on the open gate panel on Hawes Street. The resident
fence station was on the east side of the excavation area. All the fence
stations had the pumps and sample media located approximately 4.5 feet off
the ground. The predominant wind direction was from the northwest. The
ambient temperatures ranged from 95'~ on Monday and Tuesday to 70' F during
the latter part of the week.
The employee samples were all collected from the breathing zone of the
individual wearing the monitoring equipment.
The monitoring equipment was checked frequently throughout the sample
period to ensure that an adequate flow rate was being maintained. The
monitoring duration was for approximately seven hours or the duration of
the activity. The sampling media was chilled prior to shipment to the
analytical laboratory. Field blanks for each sample media were submitted
with the samples. Tables 3 and 4 indicate the sampling summaries for the
employee and ambient air monitoring.
The analysis of the samples was conducted according to NIOSH methods speci-
fic for constituent of interest. Tables 5 and 6 indicate the analytical
results of the samples.
4.6 Personal Protective Eaui~ment
The minimum level of protection for exclusion area personnel included the
following:

1. Hardhat
2. Calf length steel-toed neoprene boots
3. Tyvek coveralls or PVC rainpants and safety glasses (for work
where splash hazards and upper body skin contact were not expected
to occur)
During activities where upper body skin contact was a potential exposure
mechanism, pol ycoated Tyvek coverall s were used, as appropriate, in place
of the rainpants.
Further discussion of personal protective equipment during liquid removal
and soil excavation activities is provided in Section 4.5.
Eyewash bottles were maintained in the drum handling and support areas.
The site first aid kit was located in the support area. Twenty pound ABC
fire extinguishers were maintained in the drum handling area and in the
support area. Specific use of and changes in protection equipment were as
required by the site Health and Safety Officer in consideration of site
conditions and construction activities.
4.7 Decontamination Procedures
4.7.1 Personal Decontamination
All disposable clothing was deposited in containers on-site for off-site
disposal. Wash tubs with soap and water and rinse tubs were provided for
decontamination of boots and outer gloves. Respirators were cleaned with
sanitizing wipes unless gross contamination required submersion in a
wash/rinse tub. All decontamination was performed in the area shown on
Figure 3.
Soap and water were provided for personnel to wash up with after work or if
any skin contamination occurred during the work day.

4.7.2 Eauioment Decontamination
All construction and drum handling equipment which had been in contact with
contaminated materials was steam cleaned before leaving the site. Waste
hauling trucks which became contaminated during loading were steam cleaned
before leaving the site. Steam cleaning operations were performed by
placing plastic in an area large enough to contain the equipment to be
decontaminated. Steam cleaning water was allowed to flow onto contaminated
areas to assist in dust suppression and to provide moisture for compaction.
At no time was the steam cleaning water allowed to leave the site.
Emergency berms were constructed, if required, to contain the water.
4.8 General Site Health and Safetv and Work Rules
No drinking, gambling, or illegal drugs were allowed on-site.
Personal protective equipment was required in designated areas.
Such equipment included, but was not limited to, respiratory
protection, earplugs, hardhat, rainsuits, boots, gloves, and
chemical goggles.
Eating, drinking, smoking, and chewing gum or tobacco were allowed
only in designated areas.
Changes in work practice or work rules were implemented only after
approval by the Project Manager and the site Health and Safety
Officer.
Construction equipment always had the right-of-way over regular
vehicles.
All employees entering the Exclusion Area completed the required
decontamination procedure before leaving the Exclusion Area.
41

7. All protective clothing worn inside the Exclusion Area was
supplied. None of this equipment was permitted to leave the site
until completion of the project.
4.9 Traininq
All on-site personnel had prior experience and training in compliance with
29 CFR 1910.120.
Project-specific training was provided before startup of on-site
activities. This training included the following:
site health and safety plan
decontamination
personnel protection levels
chemical hazards
medical monitoring
air monitoring
use and maintenance of personal protective equipment
work zones
site safety rules and conditions of employment
10. emergency provisions
11. buddy system
On-site tailgate meetings on health and safety were held as appropriate.
The site Health and Safety Officer conducted these meetings.
4.10 Medical Monitoring
All on-site personnel participated in a medical monitoring program.
Canonie staff or contractor personnel who are involved in the annual
corporate medical program received a blood chemistry test and blood lead
analysis before starting work at the site.

All on-site and trucking personnel hired specifically for the work at the
site received a pre-employment physical which included the following:
medical history
physical exam
pulmonary function test
EKG
audiogram
blood lead
CBC with differential and platelets urinalysis with dipstick and
microscopic morphology
chest X-rays - P/A and lateral
lumbar sacral X-rays - three views
Post project exams were conducted at the discretion of the site Health and
Safety Officer considering site conditions and exposures.
4.11 Work Zone and Site Security
4.11.1 Exclusion Area
All of the drum yard and the excavation area were considered the exclusion
area prior to cover placement. Access to this area was restricted to site
personnel who had completed the training and medical exam requirements, and
who were using appropriate protective equipment.
Once the first layer of capping material had been applied to the drum yard,
personal protective equipment was downgraded and exclusion areas revised,
as appropriate.
4.11.2 Decontamination Area
The eastern area of the site as shown in Figure 3 was designated as the
decontamination or contamination reduction area. As personnel either left

the drum yard or the site, they passed through this area to the support
area inside the building.
4.11.3 Suo~ort Area
The existing office and toilet facilities inside the building was used as a
support area for the project.
4.11.4 Site Security
The perimeter of the site was surrounded by fencing with locked gates. The
site was secured in this manner during the project. Security guards were
used during implementation of the ERA until the HDPE liner and sand cover
were placed.
Daytime personnel access to the site was only through the personnel
entrance shown on Figure 3. Equipment access was through the gate along
Shafter Avenue. No personnel access was allowed through this gate except
as required to deliver or operate equipment.
4.12 Communitv Health and Safety
The potential community hazards included the excavation of the residential
backyards, airborne dust or organic vapors, the presence of construction
equipment, and higher than normal truck traffic around the site.
Temporary fencing was placed around the site during the ERA activities and
will remain in place until final fencing has been installed. Any open
excavation was fenced or barricaded to prevent entrance by off-site
personnel. Warning tape or signs were posted to advise offsite personnel
to stay out of the construction areas. Only authorized personnel were
admitted onto the site.

Exposures to dust and/or organic vapors were minimized through wetting
techniques, as appropriate. In addition, plastic sheeting was placed on
temporary fencing in the residential yards to restrict migration of
excavated materials. Residents were advised to keep windows and doors
closed if these openings face the excavation area.
Air monitoring was conducted during several of the work activities as
described in detail in Section 4.5.
Truck traffic included del ivery and removal of construction materi a1 s,
equipment and supplies, and trailers containing excavated materials and
debris for off-site disposal. Vehicles were decontaminated before leaving
ing the site, as necessary. Traffic control was not provided and was not
considered necessary to prevent street congestion or traffic hazards to
local residents or businesses. Site entrances were controlled to eliminate
pedestrian traffic.
45

TABLES

TXBLE I
SUBCONTRACTOR LIST
NAME REPRESENTATIVE PHONE
West Coast Locators
Nilex
.AAA Fence
Roscoe Moss
American Soil Products
Raisch Products
Levine Metal
Anchor Fence
Wells Security Service
Esquivel Grading
and Paving
Dolan Concrete
Herzog & Associates
Chemical Waste Management
Frank Zamira
James Cramer
scott
Dorothy
Adam Dauls
Bob Renna
Gary
Tony Chapman
Donna Wells
Jon Walsh
Dan Blamer
Wayne Oakley
Keith Pushaw
With Fencing Bob With
NUMBER TASK RESPONSIBILITY
Utility Location
Geotextile & HDPE Lining
Temporary Fence
PUC Pipe
Fine Soil., Fill, Sand, Topsoil
Aggregate Base
Boiler Tank Removal
Chain Link Fence Installation
Security Guard
Asphalt Construction
Concrete Construction
Soil Testing
Transportation and Disposal of
Waste Materials
Wood Fence Installation

OR4 INVOICE #445
OISWSllL
- - - - - - - - -- - - -
MANIFEST No. DATE
.--....----. .. . . -.-..---.
87341403-51 :: 10/6/87
87341404-51 :: 10/6/87
87341405-51 :: 10/6/87
87341406-51 : : 10/6/87
87341407-51 :: 10/6/87
87341408-51 :: 10/6/87
TABLE 2
SUMMRRY OF HAZRRWUS WASTE OISWSAL
BAY ARE& DRUM
10/87
YRRDAGE : WEIGHT : PROFILE :DISPOSAL
10/87 10/87 10/87 10/87
TRANSPORT : DEMURRAGE: LINERS : TAX ::
-
BAY RREA DRUM 87-035.21
EXTENTION
CWM
---------.
3.133.43
3,511.93
3,490.90
3,511.93
3,448.84
3,427.82
3,469.87
3,385.76
3,133.43
3.133.43

3W INVOICE Y446
OISWSAL
------.-----
------------
MANIETST No. :: DATE : YARDAGE
. . .
87080611-51 :: 9/29/87 : 20.00
87080612-51 :: 9/29/87 : 20.00
81080596-51 :: 1011187 : 20.00
i3W4 INVOICE a473
DISWSAL
------------
.
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
SUHMARY OF HAZAROOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
BAY ARFA DRUM
WEIGHT : PROFILE
0 :ENR-G57146
0 :m-G5714b
13,080 :m-G51146
19,300 :EMR-G57146
8,760 :ERR-G5714b
0 :W-G51146
20,660 :FBI-G57146
0 :Ern-G57146
61800
MANIFEST No. DATE : YARDAGE : WEIGHT : PROFILE
.
87341238-51 : : 10/27/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98113
87341239-51 :: 10/27/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87440407-51 :: 10/27/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87440408-51 :: 10/27/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87341240-51 :: 10/29/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87341241-51 :: l0/29/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87341242-51 :: 10/29/87 : 15 : 0 :ENR-G98713
87341243-51 :: 10129187 : 15 : 0 :Em-G98713
10/87 10/87 10187
:DISPOSAL : TRANSPORT : DEMURRAGE:
:DISPOSAL : TRANSPORT : DEMURRAGE:
.
: 1,800.00 : 1.093.43 :
: 1.800.00 : 1.093.43 :
10/87
LINERS :
10/87
TAX : :
. . .
240.00 ::
240.00 ::
240.00 ::
192.00 ::
240.00 ::
240.00 ::
240.00 ::
240.00 ::
. .
. .
.............
1,872.00
BAY RRWL DRUM 87-035.21
EXTENTION
LINERS : TAX : : CWM
36,000.00 21,868.60 315.42 1,200.00 3,600.00 62,984.02
Environmental

CWH INVOICE W515
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
SUMMARY OF HAZRRWUS WASTE DISPOSAL
BAY AREA DRUH
DISWSAL
------------
MANIFEST No. :: DATE : YARDAGE : WEIGHT : PROFILE
.----------- . .
10/87
:DISPOSAL
10187 10/87 10187
: TRANSPORT : DEMURRAGE: LINERS :
10/87
TAX
' EXTENTION
:: cnn
. .
87341214-51 :: 11/24/87 : 15 : 0.00 :EN-G98713 : 1,800.00 : 1,093.43 : 84.11 : 60.00 : 180.00 :: 3,217.54
.. ---------- . -----------
. . . .
. .
. . 0.00
. . 0.00
---------~~~~~~~~~.....~~-~~~----------~--~~~
1,800.00 1,093.43 84.11 60.00 180.00 3,217.54
Environmental

Sample
Number
87035-25
87035-26
87035-27
87035-28
87035-41
87035-42
87035-43
87035-56
87035-57
87035-58
87035-59
87035-60
87035-61
I I]
Sample
Enolovee Media
TABLE 3
EMPLOYEE A IR MONITORING COLLECTION SUMMARY
Flow Rate Dvration
Supervisor, Charcoal Tube 11934 47 cc/m 452 min.
General Site Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m
Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m
Laborer, Pre-Wei hted 17840 1.9l/m 443 min.
Excavation Area MCEF ~iqter
Equipment Charcoal Tube 5067-10 46 cc/m 429 min.
Operator, Fluosil Tube 200 cc/m
Grading Area Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m
Equipment Charcoal Tube 5067-10 46 cc/m 434 min.
Operator, Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m
Excavation Area Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m
Equipment Charcoal Tube 5067-10 46 cc/m 434 min.
Operator, Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m
Excavation Area Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m
NIOSH
Method Chemical
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S262 Total Dust
PlCAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
I Environmental

TABLE 4
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING COLLECTION SUMMARY
NlOSH
Flow Rate Duration Volume Method Chemical
10/5 87035-01 West Fence Pre-Wei hted 17840 2.1 l/m 49 min. 1.0 M3 S262 Total Dust
MCEF ~igter PLCAM173 Lead
87035-02 Charcoal Tube 5 47 cc/m 480 min. 23 1 S25 Vinyl Chloride
87035-03 Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m 87 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87034-04 Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m 87 1 5503 PCB-particulate
10/5 87035-05 Resident Pre-Weighted 17839 2.1 1/m 479 min. 1.0 M~ 5262 Total Dust
Fence MCEF filter PtCAM173 Lead
87035-06 Charcoal Tube 11934 48 cc/m 480 min. 23 1 525 Vinyl Chloride
87035-07 Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m 94 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87035-08 Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m 94 1 5503 PCB-particulate
10/5 87035-09 Plating Shop Pre-Weighted 17841 2.2 1/m 480 min. 1.1 M3 5262 Total Dust
MCEF filter PLCAM173 Lead
87035-10 Charcoal Tube 11935 49 cc/m 440 min. 22 1 525 Vinyl Chloride
87035-1 1 Fl uorsi 1 Tube 210 cc/m 92 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87035-12 Glass Fiber Filter 210 cc/m 92 1 5503 PCB-particulate
10/5 87035-13 Southern Pre-Wei hted 17842 2.2 1/m 478 min. 1.0 M~ S262 Total Oust
Fence MCEF fii'ter P&CAM173 Lead
87035-14 Charcoal Tube 5067-10 49 cc/m 488 min. 24 1 S25 Vinyl Chloride
87035-15 Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m 98 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87035-16 Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m 98 1 5503 PCB-particulate
I Environmental

Sample
e e f s E B r & & ?
10/7 87035-33 Southern
Fence
87035-34
87035-35
87035-36
Sample
TABLE 4
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING COLLECTION SUMMARY
(Continued)
Pre-Uei hted 17841
MCEF filter
Charcoal Tube 11935
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
10/7 87035-37 West Fence Pre-Wei hted 17842
MCEF fi7ter
Charcoal Tube 11935
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
10/B 87035-14 West Fence Pre-Uei hted 17839
MCEF filter
Charcoal Tube 5
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
10/8 87035-48 Southern
Fence
87035-49
87035-50
87035-51
Pre-Wei hted 17839
NCEF fiyter
Charcoal Tube 11934
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
&p Flow Rate
2.2 l/m
Ouration
393 min.
392 min.
438 min.
442 min.
425 min.
428 min.
418 min.
421 min.
NIOSH
--
Method Chemical
S262 Total Dust
PllCAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S262 Total Dust
P&CAH173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
5262 Total Dust
PtCAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S262 Total Dust
P&CAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate

Sample
t&!w
87035-66
87035-67
87035-68
87035-69
87035-70
87035-71
87035-72
87035-73
87035-52
87035-53
87035-54
87035-55
87035-62
87035-63
87035-64
87035-65
fmIQw2
Southern
Fence
Southern
Fence
Resident
Fence
Resident
Fence
Sample
TABLE 4
AMBIENT AIR MONlTORlNG COLLECTION SUMMARY
(Continued)
m
Pre-Weighted 17840
MCEF filter
Charcoal Tube 11935
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
Pre-Wei hted 17842
MCEF fi'i'ter
Charcoal Tube 11934
Fl uorsi 1 Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
Pre-Weighted 17841
REF filter
Charcoal Tube 11935
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
Pre-Weighted 17839
MCEF filter
Charcoal Tube 5
Fluorsil Tube
Glass Fiber Filter
Flow Rate
1.9 l/m
46 cc/m
200 cc/m
200 cc/m
2.1 l/m
46 cc/m
200 cc/m
200 cc/m
2.0 l/m
46 cc/m
200 cc/m
200 cc/m
2.1 l/m
38 cc/m
200 cc/m
200 cc/m
Duration
429 min.
428 min.
425 min.
429 min.
416 min.
417 min.
455 min.
460 min.
SZ62 Total Dust
PKAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S262 Total Dust
PaCAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
5262 Total Dust
PKAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
S262 Total Dust
PaCAM173 Lead
S25 Vinyl Chloride
5503 PCB-vapor
5503 PCB-particulate
I Environmental

Sample Sample
~~~~
TABLE 4
AMBIENT AIR MONlTORING COLLECTION SUMMARY
(Continued)
NIOSH
Flow Rate Duration Volume Method Chemical
10/6 87035-21 Resident Pre-Wei hted 17842 2.1 1/m 615 min. 1.3 M3 S262 Total Dust
Fence MCEF filter P&CAH173 Lead
87035-22 Charcoal Tube 5 39 cc/m 617 min. 24 1 S25 Vinyl Chloride
87035-23 Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m 125 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87035-24 Glass Fiber filter 200 cc/m 125 1 5503 PCB-particulate
10/7 87035-29 Resident Pre-Wei hted 17839 2.1 1/rn 394 min. 830 1 S262 Total Dust
Fence HCEF fii'ter P&CAM173 Lead
87035-30 Charcoal Tube 5 40 cc/m 397 rnin. 16 1 S25 Vinyl Chloride
87035-31 Fluorsil Tube 200 cc/m 79 1 5503 PCB-vapor
87035-32 Glass Fiber Filter 200 cc/m 79 1 5503 PCB-particulate

TABLE 6
AMBIENT AIR MONlTORlNG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Date- K - PCB Lead fMs/m31
10/5 Southern Fence BDL BDL
West Fence BDL BDL
Resident Fence BDL BDL
Plating Shop BDL BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
10/6 Resident Fence BDL BDL BDL
10/7 Southern Fence BDL BDL
West Fence BDL BDL
Resident Fence BDL BDL
10/8 Southern Fence BDL BDL
West Fence BDL BDL
Resident Fence BDL BDL
10/9 Southern Fence
West Fence
Resident Fence
BDL BDL
BDL BDL
BDL BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
Limit of Detection: 0.001 nq 0.05 ug tubes 0.002 mg
0.3 ug-filters
NIOSH Method: S25 5503 PllCAM173
BDL: Below Detection Limit
Total ~ust (ns/m3)
0.2
BDL
0.3
0.4
BDL
BDL
BDL
0.2
BDL
0.1
0.2
BDL
BDL
I
I Environmental
, ,~ .. .....m?.......... ~~.., ~~~ , ~~ ~.
~. ... ,.... ..-~.

FIGURES

APPENDIX A
Environmental

APPENDIX B
Environmental

100 50 10 5
GRAIN SlZE IN MILLIMETERS
:OBBLES
GRAVEL
coARs, 1 FINE
I SAND
ICOARSE~ MEDIUM I FINE I SILT OR CLAY 1
Symbol Sample Source I Classiflcatlon
0
%
Felton Sand
Sand 95.8 Light Brown Silty
American Soils Products, Inc. % Silt 1.2 Clayey Sand (SP)
% Clay 3.0
Job No:
DONALD 5674.3-0-8 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS PLATE
HERZGG Appr:
& ASSEIATES. INC. 0G-o Canonie Engineers
CEOTECH\IC+L C0'.51( T.\'.rS
Aug. 1987
1

(Common F ill) % Clay 24.5
and 38.2 Light Brown Clayey
% silt 37.3 Sandy S ilt (ML)
Canonie Engineers

TEST MET OD: ASTM 0 1 57-70 (C)
I 50 60
MOISTURE CONTENT
' ShMPLE DEPTH I CLASSIFICATION I SOURCE
/ BULK A 0.00 '
OONALO
'iERZO[j
ASSCCIFITES
GEOTECHNICfiL CONSULTANTS
LIGHT BROWN GRAVELLY SANO

' SAMPLE DEPTH I
CLASSIFICATION
20 38 48 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%I
BULK B 0.88 LIGHT BROWN CLAYEY SILT(ML> COMMON FILL 118
DONALD
YERZCG
ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
Job No:
5674.03.ee.8
Date:
w
Septembar 1987
COMPACTION TEST DATA
BAY AREA DRUM
Bay firma, California
OPTIMIUM
'IOISTURE (%)
PLATE
5

20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM
SAMPLE CLASSIFICATION SOURCE DENSITY f~cfl MOISTURE I%)
DONALD
HERZOG
& ASSmIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Job No:
Date:
56'74.03.00.8
November 1987
COMPACTION TEST DATA
CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL
Mountain View, California
PLATE
1

NUCLEw
t
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
PRoJECT NAME A RL-A DRUM TESTED BY G ~ t e h ) ~ ~
PROJECT No A7 -03-r CALCULATED BY -J.&
DATE CHECKED BY w ~uo(/i TEST DATA
WET DENSITY
(PCF) )24. 5 123.L 123 /
YOIGTWIE
COUNT
STANMRD COUNT REMARKS :
DOI$ITY I MOISTURE
-.
I
-
,~

PROJECT NAME 3.b 1'
PROJECT No. 87 - n 7.7
PGk, PW TESTED 8. Y A 'dl -
DATE 1 I//() 1 Q J ~
WBER OF
PASSES
-.
LIFT
THICKNESS
DENSITY
CWNT
,. 7. .
DRY DENSITY
(PCF)
CALCULATED BY ii /c l
CHECKED BY A4 AX; 5,~ ct
Y,P
I IS: 0-
sh
/ 1-1
/ci%
90.2%
I1 :
. NUCLEkcc
RELATIVE
TEST DATA
-
"7

E-W COORD. /+s: 1
ELEVATION 1 I I I
.
LIFT
THICKNESS
ENSITY
MUNT 2 853- -, , .
SrANDARD COUNT REMARKS :
DDI8ITY I MOISTURE
x-
I
I I
- -
. .
I C
NUCLEA,~
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
TEST DATA
J/' 4

PROJECT NAME TESTED BY ___.----
PROJECT No. CALCULATED BY
DATE CHECKED BY
N-8 COORD.
I
i E-W COOAD.
ELNATION
YOOE DEPTH
WET DENSITY
IPCF)
MOISTURE
C U T
I C (-1 9
NUCLEkn
I
RELATIVE
COMPACTION
TEST DATA

APPENDIX C

I DATE
PROJ. NO. PROJECr NAME
L.P. NO. I SAMPLERS: Lipnafura)
NO.
-- UP
I SAMPLE ID.
CON
TAINERS
Relinquishad by: lsignatvrsl DatelTlme Recdned by: l~@nalural
I
12:~Flf
Relinquished by: lslgnalure)
I
DatelTlms
I
Re~dved by: (Slg~lurs)
I
Relinquishsd by: ISipnslurd Daleilime Re~slved lor Laboratory by:
(Sipnalure)
Remarks
Stockton, Ca. 95207
Canary Aetu r TO snipper v~nk Lab Copy
s !'

TO: R. Greenwood
FROM: J. Buerger
MEMO
Bay Area Orum Compositinq
e 4 3 O
July 20, 1987
The following table defines which of the 12 individual samples taken from Bay
Area Orum were composited together (according to compatibility). The table
also includes a sample ID assigned to the composites as per the request of
Keith Pushaw of Chem Waste Management. The composited samples were Federal
Expressed out Friday July 17, 1987, to be delivered to Chem Waste Management
on Saturday July 18. 1987.
Associated charges for compositing and shipping w i l l be billed to Laboratory
Project Number 87-0/5-2430. If there are any questions please give me a call.
JB/RR
cc : J. Bartell
K. Chirbas
7

Bay Area Drum Compositing Scheme
Assigned Individual
Composite No. Sample ID Sample ID'S on
Original Chain
Custody
1 ENRG 98713 Appletree
Lead
Sump Pit
ENRG 98714 Cylinder Cut-off
Trough
Cement
ENRG 98715 Barrel 1
Barrel 2
Barrel 3
Union O i l
ENRG 98716 Sump
Boi 1 er

Laboratory Report for
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street. Suite 260
San Mateo. CA 94402
August 4. 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle. Suite A
Stockton. CA 95206
(209) 983-1340

Bay Area Drum
87-035-2430
Lab ID No Observations Sample ID
Color: white
Odor: strong paint
Layers: single phased
pH: 7.
Semi-Sol i d
Color: black
Odor: strong hydrocarbons
Layers: single phased
pH: 10.
Semi-Solid
Color: whitelblack stripes
Odor: strong paint
Layers: black & white swirled
pH: 7.
Semi-Solid
-
(bi lavered)
Color: honey
Odor: strong motor oil
Layers: single phased
pH: 7.
Liquid
Color: beige
Odor: strong rotten motor oil
Layers: single phased
pH:

Bay Area Drum
87-035-2430
Lab ID No Observations Sample ID
Color: brown (fine,dry)
Odor: none
Layers: single phased
pH: 6.
Semi-Solid
Appletree
Brass Tube
Color: dark brown/black (moist) Lead
Odor: mild petroleum Brass Tube
Layers: single phased
pH: 6.
Sol id
Color: brown (fine, dry)
Odor: none
Layers: single phased
pH: 6.
Sol id
Sump Pit
Brass Tube
Color: dark gray/white specks (paint) Cylinder Cut-off
Odor: strong paint Mason Jar
Layers: mostly solid. small amount
liquid (bilayered)
pH: 5.
Moist Rubbery
10% free liquid
Color: rusty with purple & gray Trough
pockets Mason Jar
Odor: none
Layers: single phased
pH: 9.
Solid (dry)
Color: brown with green tint
Odor: none
Layers: single phased
pH: 8.
Solid. Moist
Cement
Mason Jar

. .
Bay Area Drum
87-035-2430
Lab ID No Observations Sample I0
Corposite of
71 1382
71 1383
71 1384
Corposite of
71 1379
71 1381
Color: black
Odor: strong petroleum
Layers: single phased
pH: 10.
Semi-Sol i d
Immiscible in water
ENRG98715
Mason Jar
Color: dirty gray/orange ENRG98716
Odor: we respect the potential Idason Jar
hazards associated with the
inhalation of this composite
Layers: single phased
pH: 3.
Liquid
Miscible in water
Produced off-gas upon compositing
No noticeable heat generation

Client ID: BAY ARE?? DRUM Data Fi la:>1940V
Sample ID: 87-035-2478 SAMPLE TOPSOIL 711940
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
--_11-.--11----1---__II
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHGNE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
Ill-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHRNE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CRRBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROflOCHLOROMETH~NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-OICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRKHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBEMZENE
I;C/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
P19111-I-l-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
KRECOUERY
1.1111=----
84.9
93.8
87.4
DET, LIMIT
.1.--====-
629 ug/'kg
1250 ug/kg
1290 ug/kg
1250 ug,'kg
1250 ug/kg
625 uglkq
625 ugAg
625 ugf'kg
62hg/kg
625 ug.'kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
62% ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/'kg
625 ug/k.g
625 ug/kg
625 ug/lrg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
1250 ug/kg
625 ugj'kg
625 ugx'kg
625 ugfkg
625 ug/kg
625 ,ug/kg
,625 ug/kq
625 ug/kg
ii25 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
------------ ---me-----....
Analyst Checked By
03-lo-** THU 19:13:42 G 3 ** **** NO. 03
~ -~
~- ~
\

C!ient ID: RAY AREA DRUM Data File:>194lU
Sem~ la ID: 07-035-2478 SAMPLE COMMERFILL 711941
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
1--1---1I----111---1111
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
UINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
ETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
Ill-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTGL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHAME
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,P-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBRONOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL UIMYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHeNE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,Z-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
GC/MS
UOLAT I LE ANALYS 19
AMOUNT
IP-II-1I.D-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NW
ND
rm
ND
NO
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.10
ND
t.ID
NP
ND
ND
------------
Analyst
03-lo-** THU 19:12:48 G 3 ** ****
DET. LIMIT
I-I-=-3===
625 ua/kg
1250 ug/kg
1250 ug/kg
1250 ugj'kg
1250 ug/kg
625 ug./kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ugfkg
625 ,ug/kg
625 ug*kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug4.g
625 ug/kg
625 ug/'kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
1250 ug/kg
625 ugfkg
625 irgikg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
629 ug/kg
------------
Checked By

August 11. 1987
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo. CA 94402
Dear Mr. Greenwood:
Enclosed are the laboratory results for the samples submitted to the
Canonie Environmental Analytical Laboratory.
Canonie Environmental SeMces Corp.
212 Frank West Circle
Suite A
Stockton. Califomla 95206
Unless otherwise instructed by you samples will be returned or disposed of
two weeks from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions please call Jon Bartell or me at (209) 983-1340.
Very puly yours,
Kenneth C. Wahl
Manager of Laboratory Services
Enclosure

Laboratory Report for
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street. Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
August 11, 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle. Suite A
Stockton, CA 95206
(209) 983-1340

Sampler ID
Analysis: Toxic Metals
Table 1
Codes of Samples Received
From Bay Area Drum
Project: 87-035
Date Date
Sampled Received Lab ID# Sample T ~ E
Commerfi 11 bag 07-17-87 07-21-87 711943 Soi 1
Topsoi 1 bag 07-17-87 07-21-87 711942 Soi 1
08-10-1987
87-035-2478
Page 1
Container
Plastic bag
Plastic bag

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
Analyte(s)
Arsenic
Antimony
Bari um
Beryllium
Cadmi um
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molydbenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thal 1 i um
Vanadium
Zinc
Table 2
Results of Toxic Metals Analysis on Soil
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in mg/kg
[Checked by
Topsoi 1
bag
71 1942
08-10-1987
87-035-2478
Page 2
Note:
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X.
'VD X denotes none detected to a level of X due t In interfering peak. CarrorrieEnvironmental

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM Data F~le:>1940U
Sample ID: 87-035-2478 SAMPLE TOPSOIL 711940
Matrlx : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
UINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
1,l-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPPOPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TPICHLOPOETHENE
BENZENE
DIBRONOCHLORO~ETHANE
1 ,1,2- TR I CHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2 -D I CHLOROBENZENE
1,0-DI CHLOROBENZENE
GC.'MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
-----------
N D
ND
ND
ND
NCI
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NU
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NC
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET. LIMIT
----------
----------
625 ~ ~ / k g
1250 ugjkg
1250 ugx'kg
1250 ugfkg
1250 ug/kg
625 ug4.g
625 ug/kg
625 ug.'ka
625 ugfkg
625 uq/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug/k.g
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 ugikg
625 ug4g
625 ug/kg
625 ug/kg
625 uq/! g
625 ug/kg
1250 ug.,'kg
625 ug.'kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug.'kg
625 ug/kg
625 ug&g
625 ug/kg
625 ug4q
625 ug.'kg
625 ug/kg
Checked B
" &honie~rwironrne&

Tlient ID: BAY AREA DRUM Data Flle:,1?41U
Sarno le ID: 87-035-2478 SAMPLE COMMERFILL 711941
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
. 1 ,1-D ICHLOROETHENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLORUETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPPOPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOPOMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHQNE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,s-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
D4-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (SURF!)
D8 - TOLUENE
4-BROMOFLUOROBENZEl4E
GUMS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
tJC1
DET.
=====
625
1250
125 0
1250
1250
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
025
625
625
625
1250
625
625
625
625
625
Ana 1 st Checked By
bnonie~nvironrnental

Client ID: BAY RREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-2478 COMMERF I LL TUBE
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pheno 1
his(-2-Chloroethyl )Ether
2-Ch loropheno 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
fsophorone
2-Ni t ropheno 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
his(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2;4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Tr ich lorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trlch lorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dlnitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dlnit ro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylarn~ne
4-Brornophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentach lorophenol
Phenanthrene
Ant hracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
GC/MS
SEMI-UDLATILE ANALYSIS
Data File:>B1941
71 1941

BAY AREA DRUM
711941 LP-2478
PAGE 2
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a )Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
DibenzoCa ,h )Anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Analyst Checked By

Tllent ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sarno le ID: 87-035-2478 TOPSOIL TUBE
natr~x : SOIL
L
- COMPOQND NAME
.......................
N-Nitrosodirnethylarnine
Pheno 1
his(-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
l,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylarnlne
Hexach lo roethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dlrnethylphenol
b is(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Tr ichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Ch loro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Tr~chlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dirnethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Ni t ropheno 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
D~ethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benz id ine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Brornophenyl-phenylether
Hexach lorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
GC/MS
SEMI-VOLATILE ANALYSIS
Data File:>B1940
711840

ND
~thalate -
- ND
obenz~dlne
ND
racene
ND
'xyl )Phthalate ND
hthalate
tn t hene
lnt hene
ie
d)Pyrene
thracene
'erylene
& &&+ /
---- -_--__ --- ------
Analyst Checked By

-
Water
Soi 1
Reference Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
Preparation Analysis
x - EPA 5030
ANALYST RGP
1) Eisenberg. Don M. et al. "Guidelines for
Addressing Fuel Leaks". California Regional
Water Quality Control Board.
Bay Region. Sept. 1985.
San Francisco
EPA 601
-EPA - 602
- EPA 624
- EPA 8010
- EPA 8020
AEPA 8240
Project # 87-035-2478
Date fompieted 08-1 0-1 987
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1

Preparation
Water - EPA 3510
- EPA 3520
- EPA 3540
&PA 3150
Reference Methods
Semi-volatile Organics
(BNA's)
Analysis
- EPA 625
Project # 87-035-2478
Date Completed m-in-1982
ANALYST b

-
Preparation:
Reference Methods
Metals
Project # 87-035-2478
Acid Digestion - EPA 3010
- EPA 3020
- EPA 3030
Date Completed 08-10-1 987
- EPA 3040
J EPA 3050
-
Mercury Digestion - EPA 7470 Water
-
$/ EPA 7471 Soil
Alkaline Digestion - EPA 3060
EP Toxicity - EPA 1310
CAM STLC - T itle 22 CAC
ANALYST a??-

Reference Methods
Metals
Soi 1
Atomic Absorption Metals Analysis
Project # 87-035-2478
Date Completed 08-10-1- ~.
Graph~te Hydride Cold
Element Flame Furnace Generation Vapor ICP
- -
A1 umi num
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bery 11 ium
Cadmi um
Calcium
Chromi urn (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassiuii;
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Strontium
Thal 1 i urn
Vanadi urn
Zinc
- EPA 7040
- EPA 7080
- EPA 7090
- EPA 7130
- EPA 7190
- EPA 7210
- EPA 7380
- EPA 7420
- EPA 7460
- EPA 7520
- EPA 7760
EPA 7770
- EPA 7840
- EPA 7910
- EPA 7950
VEPA 7041
>PA - 7060
- EPA 7081
- EPA 7091
EPA 7131
- EPA 7191
- EPA 7211
- EPA 7381
- EPA 7421
- EPA 7461
- EPA 7521
- iEPA 7740
- EPA 7761
,&PA 7841
-EPA - 7911
- EPA 7951
- EPA 7061
- EPA 7741
- L

. . .~ tianary. netmrcmy-r~snipp~r
SL(3NIVl
vv
'11'1 3ldWVS 31VO
NO3
30 IW"ls"BtS1 :SU3ldWVS 'ON 'd'l
ON
'-'. . - -?
i 1
Pl"k Lab copy
.
---

ILUTIDN -
YORKER

I DATE ANAL: I t a m , - I

CLIENT: I. j v FIt-ee Drd!:
PROJECT r: L-!-

LLIENT: hty R ~ E C P:.ur'.
PROJECT *: E;7-G35-ATE .
>ILUTION
NORKER
.A8 I.D.
:lNAL
-

Water
Soi 1
Reference Methods
Grganochlorine Pesticides
And PCB's
Pre~aration Analysis
- EPA 3510 - ~ E P A 608
- *?A 3520 - EPA 625
Date Completed 08-27-1987

.- -
Water
Soi 1
Reference Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
Preparation Analysis
- EPA 601
EPA 602
~ E P 624 A
- EPA 5030 - EPA 8010
- EPA 8020
- EPA 8240
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1
ANALYST fi 6-4'
.-
1) Eisenberg. Don M. et al, "Guidelines for
Addressing Fuel Leaks", California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco
Bay Region, Sept. 1985.
-

Water
Soi 1
Preparation
- EPA 3510
>PA 3520
- EPA 3540
EPA 3550
Reference Methods
Semi-volatile Organics
(BNA's)
Analysis
- EPA 8270
project # 87-035-03-2652
Date Completed 08-37-1 9~
ANALYST hq

Element
A1 umi num
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmi um
Cal ci um
Chromium ( Total)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesi um
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassi um
Selenium
Silver
Sod i urn
Strontium
Thal 1 ium
Vanadi um
Zinc
Reference Methods
Metals
Water
Atomic Absorption Metals Analysis
Graphite Hydride
- Flame Furnace Generation
- EPA 202.1 EPA 202.2
- EPA 204.1 TEPA - 204.2
Cold
Vapor
&PA 206.2 EPA 206.3
- -
EPA 208.1 - EPA 208.2
EPA 210.1 EPA 210.2
-. A
- EPA 213.1 - EPA 213.2
- EPA 215.1
- EPA 218.1 - EPA 218.2
- EPA219.1 EPA219.2
A EPA 220.1 - EPA 220.2
- EPA 236.1 - EPA 236.2
- EPA 239.1 - EPA 239.2
- EPA 242.1
- EPA 243.1 - EPA 243.2
- EPA 246.1 - EPA 246.2
EPA 249.1 EPA 249.2
-EPA A 258.1 -
JEPA 270.2 EPA 270.3
- EPA 272.1 - -EPA 272.2 -
- EPA 273.1
- EPA 279.1 - JEPA 279.2
- EPA 286.1 - EPA 286.2
- EPA 289.1 - EPA 289.2
ANALYST 98
Project # 87-035-03-2652
Date Completed 08-27-1987
- JEPA 245.1
- ICP
- EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- JEPA 200.7
- /EPA 200.7
- &PA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- YEPA 200.7
- /€PA 200.7
- JEPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- r/EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- JEPA 200.7
- &PA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
- /EPA 200.7
- EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
~ E P A 200.7
&PA 200.7

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
Anal yte(s)
Arsenic
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Table 2
Results of CAM Metals TTLC Analysis on Water
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in mg/l
Boiler
Tank
71 4054
08-27-1987
87-035-03-2652
Page 2
Note:
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X.
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X due an interfering peak. @an~ouieEnvironrnental

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
I I
Table 3
Results of Organochlorine Pesticides Analysis on Water
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in ug/l
Analyte(s)
Aldrin
Alpha BHC
Beta-BHC
Del ta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Chlordane
4.4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan I1
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Toxaphene
PCB quantified as 1242
PCB quantified as 1254
PCB quantified as 1260
T plr
Analyst C ecked by
Boi 1 er
Tank
714054
08-27-1 987
87-035-03-2652
Page 3
Note:
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X.
YD X denotes none detected to a level of X due t in interfering peak. Call~~~ieEnvironmental

Ciient ID: BAY WEA DRUM Data File:>4053U
Samole ID: 87-035-03-2652 SAMPLE ST-1 714053
Matrix : LIQUID
COMPOUND NAME
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
-I-*---------------____
--I-------=
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUORONETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
1 -1-D I CHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1, 2-D I CHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLDROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORDETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2-Dl CHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
SURROGATE STANDARD
-====-========m=======m-===
D4-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (SURR)
DB-TOLUENE (SURR
4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (SURR)
AMOUNT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
470.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2500.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DETECTION LIMIT RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE
DET. LIMIT
----=----P
250 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
500 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
Analyst Checked By
CanonieErwironmenta1

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM Data File:>4054U
Sample ID: 87-035-03-2652 SAMPLE BOILER TANK 714054
Matrix : LIQUID
COMPOUND NAME
DICHLORODIFLUOROHETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,1-D I CHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROHETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORN
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
SURROGATE STANDARD
D4-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (SURR)
D8-TOLUENE ( SURR
4- BROMOFLUOROBENZENE ( SUR~ )
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
__-=m-__L--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1100.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DETECTION LIMIT RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE
DET. LIMIT
----==----
250 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
500 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 . ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
250 ug/L
Analyst Checked By

Client ID: RAY AREA DPUU
Sample ID: 87-035-2652 ST1
Matrix : WATER
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
Y-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pheno 1
his(-2-Chloroethyl )Ether
2-Ch loropheno 1
1,3-Dich lorobenzene
1,4-Dich lorobenzene
l,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl>Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Ni t ropheno 1
2;4-Dimethylphenol
his(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2:d-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Henachlorocyclopentadiene
2:4;6-Trichloropheno1
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acsnaphthylene
2;6&Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
~ieth~lphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromoohenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
GC/MS
SEMI-VOLATILE ANALYSIS

BAY QREQ DRUM
714053 LP-2652
PAGE 2
,Irene
p ,-
Butylbenzylphthalate
3:3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a1Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b1Fluoranthene
Benzo(k IFluoranthene
Benzo (a )Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Benzo(q:h:i)Perylene
Analyst Checked Bu

Cl~ent ID: EQY APEA DRUM
Sam@ le ID: 57-035-2652 BOILER TQYW
Matr~x : UATEP
COMPOUND NPYE
.......................
N-Ni t rosodimethylamine
Pheno 1
bisl-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1 :3-Dich lorobenzene
1,4-Dich lorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl>Ether
N-Ni t roso-Di-Propylarnine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
his(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Herachlorobutadiene
4-Ch loro-3-Methylphenol
Hexach lorocyc lopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Pirnethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthulene
2:6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Ni t ropheno 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Ni t rosod ipheny larnine
4-Bromopheny 1-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenant hrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
r;C/US
SEMI-VOLATILE ANALYSIS
Data File:>R4054
714054

BAY AREA DRUM
714054 LP-2652
PAGE 2
Py~rene
Butylbenzylphthalate
3:3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a!Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethy1hexyl)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b )Fluoranthene
Renzo(k!Fluoranthene
Benzo (a )Pyrene
Indeno

BAY ARER DRUM
714054 LP-2652
PAGE 2
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthslate
3,3'-Diehlorobenzld~ne
Benzo(a)Anthrscene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chryaene
bi-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzotb)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(s)Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrcnc
Dibanzo(a,h)Anthrecens
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene

October 21, 1987
- Environmental
Ms. Irene Fanelli
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street. Suite 260
San Mateo. CA 94402
Dear Ms. Fanelli:
Enclosed are the laboratory results for the samples submitted to the
Canonie Environmental Analytical Laboratory.
Canonw Enwronmental Se~ces Corp
212 Frank West Clrcie
Suite A
Stockton. Caiifomia 95206
Phone: 209-983-1340
Unless otherwise instructed by you samples will be returned or disposed of
two weeks from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions please call Jon Bartell or me at (209) 983-1340.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth C. Wahl
Manager of Laboratory Services
Enclosure

Laboratory Report for
Ms. Irene Fanelli
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo. CA 94402
October 21, 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle. Suite A
Stockton, CA 95206
(209) 983-1 340

N
Pr-
am
m N
>
.- E
03
U LLn
w o o
P: 0 - m ~
Lo wrw
L a
aJ- a
F a .. n E a+
a a a U
+v,m,w
-7
'CEO
0 0 L
L a
L o u
w
u
0
U
L
w
C
.?
a
4
c
0
U
Lo &,'a
E I l l
o mmo
n 7-7
I l l
n
wwaJ
Ann
311
++i-
MVIVI
VlLoLo
a m a
L L L
mmm

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
Analyte(s)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromof orm
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1.1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethane
1,l-Dichloroethene
trans-1.2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1.3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
l.l,l-Trichloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
51 mp
AnBlyst Chec ed by
Table 2
Results of Purgeable Halocarbons Analysis on Soil
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in mg/kg
10-20-1987
87-035-2872
Page 2

u
-
Water
Soi 1
Reference -Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
Preparation Analysis
ANALYST
- 1) Eisenberg. Don M.. et al, "Guidelines for
Addressing Fuel Leaks", California Regional
Water Qua1 ity Control Board. San Francisco
Bay Region, Sept. 1985.
EPA 601
-EPA - 602
EPA 624
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1

ili3NlVl 0'1 3ldWVS 3110
NO3
do x 4117/ii/)2/
I*ml."81Sl :Sli3ldWIS 'ON 'dl
'ON

October 19, 1987
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
Dear Mr. Greenwood:
Environmental
Enclosed are the laboratory results for the samples submitted to the
Canonie Environmental Analytical Laboratory.
Canonie Enviionmenta Sewices Cop.
212 Frank West Circle
Suite A
Stockton, Caiiiomia 95206
Unless otherwise instructed by you samples w i l l be returned or disposed of
two weeks from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions please call Jon Bartell or me at (209) 983-1340.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth C. Wahl
Manager of Laboratory Services
Enclosure

Laboratory Report for
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
October 19, 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle, Suite A
Stockton, CA 95206
(209) 983-1340

m
r-w
Xlm
mw
- 1 -
I m
am
-0 GI
I I W
Or- m
-ma
L
w
c
.?
m
e
c
0
U
w o w
nn n
3 2 2
+I-+
r-r-r-
???
r- r-r-
El I l l
o mmm
a -7-
0
"lmm
"lmm
a m a
L L L
mmm

Sampler ID:
- Andlyte(s)
Bron~od ichloroniethane
bromof or111
Bru~~~ol~~ul.t~urle
Curbun tetruchloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chlorof'orm
Chlorosiethane
Oi bron~ochlorornethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Oichlorobenzene
Dichlorodif luoroo~ethane
1,l-Oichloroethane
1.2-Oichloroethane
1.1-Oicliloroethene
trans-'I. 2-Dichloroethene
1,Z-Dichloropropane
cis-1.3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
l.l,l-Trichloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlurof luoron~ethane
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
Sj ma-
AndI)-st Checked by
Table 2
Results of Purgeable Halocarbons Analysis on Soil
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in nlg/kg
10-16-1987
87-035-2865
Page 2

u
-
Water
Soi 1
Reference Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
Preparation Analysis
EPA 601
-EPA - 602
- EPA 624
- EPA 5030 $PA 8010
- EPA 8020
- EPA 8240
ANALYST
1) Eisenberg, Don M.. et al, "Guidelines for
Addressing Fuel Leaks". California Regional
- Water Quality Control Board. San Francisco
Bay Region. Sept. 1985.
5.p
project # 87-035-2865
Date Completeqo-16-1 q87
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
Analyte(s)
Antimony
~rsenic-
Bari urn
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Table 2
Results of Toxic Metals Analysis on Soil
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in mg/kg
AG BASE PERM. SAND
11-13-1987
87-035-3020
Page 2
Note:
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X.
IN0 X denotes none detected to a level of X due to an interfering peak. Canonielh I!II.~ fl ilrxrlt

NOV 13 '87 15:40 CRNONIE, STOCKTON
Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL
Phenol
bis(-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dicniorobenzene
;,4-Dichiorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chioroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichiorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chioro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4.6-~initro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
AMOUNT
===========
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
XD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Data ~ile:>B9153
719153

BAY AREA DRUM
719153 X87-035-3020
PAGE 2
Pyrexe
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
L.
- Benzo(a)Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethy1hexyl)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Occyl Phthalaze
bis-(2-Ethyihexy?)Phtkahte
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)F:uoracthece
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrece
Indeno(:,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Analyst Checked By

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
GC/MS
SEMI-VOLATILE AANLYSIS
.......................
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Phenol -
bis(-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichiorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
his(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobctadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthaiene
Dimethyl Phthalate
- Acensphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Data Filt:>R9152
719152
DET. LIMIT
----------
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 uc/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 uq/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
3300 ug/kg
3300 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
3300 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
3300 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg
660 ug/kg

BAY AREA DRUM
719152 W87-035-3020
PAGE 2
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
u 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
- Benzo(a)Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
bis-(2-Ezky1hexyi)Phthalate
Chryse~e
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fiuoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Analyst Checked By

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE: AG BASE
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
L
- CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHSOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,i-DICHLOROETHENE
1,l-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 112-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMFTHANE
TRANS- 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROKETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROEISANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLORO?ROPAXE
2-CHLOROE'THYL VINYL ETHER
- BROMOFOFX
l,i,2,2-TETFSCHLO3OET:iANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
114-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
Data File:>9152V
719152
Checked By

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE-: PER. SAND
COMPOUND N WE
.......................
DICHLORODIFL,OROMETHANE
.- - CHLOROMETHANS
BROMOMETHWE
VINYL CHLORIIE
CHLOilOETHAtiF
METHYLENE CELORIDE
TRICELOROFKOXOMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
1,l-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICfiLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOR07ROPAKE
TRAhS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICELOROETEENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOXOETHANE
CIS-Ij3-DICEIOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETEYL VINYL ETHER
- BROXOFORM
1,1,2,2-TEl.7-.CHLOROETEANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSTS
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N3
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nrl
N3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Data File:>9153V
719153
DE?. LIMIT
----------
125 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
258 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
i25 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
Checked By

November 14. 1987
Mr. Kurt Ah1 ich
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
Dear Mr. Ahlich:
Environmental
Canonie Environmental Services COP
212 Frank West Circle
Suite A
Stockton. California 95206
Phone: 209.983-1340
87-035-3020
Enclosed are the laboratory results for the samples submitted to the
Canonie Environmental Analytical Laboratory.
Unless otherwise instructed by you samples will be returned or disposed of
two weeks from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions please call Jon Bartell or me at (209) 983-1340.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth C. Wahl
Manager of Laboratory Services
Enclosure

Laboratory Report for
Mr. Kurt Ahlich
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
November 14. 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle, Suite A
Stockton, CA 95206
(209) 983-1 340

Sampler - ID
Analysis: Toxic Metals
Table 1
Codes of Samples Received
From Bay Area Drum
Project: 87-035
Date Date
Sampled Received Lab ID# Sample Type
AG BASE 11-04-87 11-06-87 7191 52 Soi 1
PERM. SAND 11-04-87 11-06-87 719153 Soi 1
11-13-1~87
87-035-3020
Page 1
Container
Mason Jar
Mason Jar

PROJ. NO. I PROJECI NAME
p-0~~3 -)jA)' A-pGn
L.P. NO. SAMPLERS: ISlgnalur4
DATE I SAMPLE 1.0
j3P d w
Recslvsd lor Laboratoq by:
ISIgn.tur.)
NO.
CON^
TAINERS
Zanonle Environmental, 212 Frank West Circle, Sulte A, Stockton, CA 95206

Sampler ID:
Lab ID#:
Analyte(s)
Antimony
Arsenic
Bari um
Beryllium
Cadmi um
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thal 1 i urn
Vanadium
Zinc
able 2
Results of Toxic Metals Analysis on Soil
Samples Received From Bay Area Drum
Results in mg/kg
AG BASE PERM. SAND
11-13-1~d7
87-035-3020
Page 2
Note:
ND X denotes none detected to a level of X.
#ND X denotes none detected to a level of X due to an interfering peak. CanonieEnvi ronmenbl

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Phenol
bis(-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
GC/MS
SEMI-VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Data File:>B9153
719153
DET. LIMIT
----------
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
1650 ug/kg
1650 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
1650 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
1650 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
330 ug/kg

BAY AREA DRUM
719153 #87-035-3020
PAGE 2
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phth
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
ate
bis-(~-~th~lhex~l)~hthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Checked By

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Phenol
bis(-2-Chloroethy1)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)Ether
N-Nitroso-Di-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(-2-Ch1oroethoxy)Methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
Benzidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-N-Butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
GC/MS
SEMI-VOLATILE ANALYSIS
Data File:>R9152
719152
DET. LIMIT
----------

BAY AREA DRUM
719152 #87-035-3020
PAGE 2
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthracene
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
bis-(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Checked By

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-3020
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE: PER. SAND
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
u
- BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
- TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Data File:>9153V
719153
DET. LIMIT
----------
125 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
250 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 .ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
125 ug/kg
Checked By

Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmi um
Calcium
Chromium (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Si lver
Sodi um
Stronti um
Thall ium
Vanadium
Zinc
Reference Methods
Metals
Soi 1
Atomic Absorption Metals Analysis
Graphite Hydride
F 1 ame Furnace Generation
- I
- EPA 7040 AA 7041
ZA P A 7060 - EPA 7061
- EPA 7080 - EPA 7081
- EPA 7090 -EPA 7091
- EPA 7130 - EPA 7131
- EPA 7190 - EPA 7191
-
EPA 7210 EPA 7211
A
- EPA 7380 EPA 7381 -
- EPA 7420 EPA 7421 -
- EPA 7460 EPA 7461 -
- EPA 7520 EPA 7521 -
- .&PA 7740
-
- EPA 7760 EPA 7761
- EPA 7770
-
- EPA 7840 YEPA 7841
EPA 7910 - EPA 7911
-EPA 7950 EPA 7951
- -
- EPA 7741
ANALYST IL LS
proJect # 87-035-3020
Date Compf eted 1 1 -1j-19~
Cold
Vapor ICP
-
- EPA 6010
- EPA 6010
- EPA 6010
- ,+PA 6010
- EPA 6010
- EPA 6010
- YEPA 6010
- EPA 6010
- EPA 6010
- 4 A 6010
&PA 6010
-

u
Preparation:
Reference Methods
I"tetc1s
Acid Digestion EPA 3010
- EPA 3020
- EPA 3030
- EPA 3040
/ EPA 3050
-
Mercury Digestion - EPA 7470 Water
-
EPA 7471 Soi 1
Alkaline Digestion - EPA 3060
EP Toxicity EPk 1310
CAM STLC -
OTHER
Title 22 CAC

Preparation
Water - EPA 3510
- EPA 3520
Soi 1 - EPA 3540
Reference Methods
Semi-volatile Organics
(BNA's)
Analysis
- EPA 625
Project # 87-035-3020
Date Completed 11-13-1 987
ANALYST DL-/

Water
Soi 1
Reference Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
Preparation Analysis
ANALYST ".c-v
1) Eisenberg, Don M.. et al, "Guidelines for
Addressing Fuel Leaks", California Regional
Water Quality Control Board. San Francisco
Bay Region, Sept. 1985.
- EPA 601
- EVA 602
- EPA 624
- EPA 8010
- EPA 8015
- EPA 8020
EPA 8240
i
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM Data ~ile:>9822V
Sample ID: 87-035-03-3086 719822
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE: VCS2
COMPOUND NAME
P==P======PP======I=E==
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1,l-DICHMROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
lIltl-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICIILOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
CIS- 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,4-DICHMROEENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
========PI=
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730.
ND
ND
150.
ND
ND
ND
ND
1300.
160.
ND
ND
ND
DET. LIMIT
==E..i======
25 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
Checked By

u
-
Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM Data File: >9822V
Sample ID: 87-035-03-3086 719822
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE: VCS2
COMPOUND NAME
I I ~ I I I P I I I I I I P e P = m E p I L I
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
Ill-DICHLOROETHENE
lll-DICHMROETHANE
TOTAL 112-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
112-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-113-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
- BROMOFORM
~I~,~,~-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
- - - - - - - -
1 ; 4-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
P==EPII=ILI
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730.
ND
ND
150.
ND
ND
ND
ND
1300.
160.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
26.
490.
ND
370.
ND
DET. LIMIT
IIPPIIPIII
25 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
25 ug/kg
Checked By

November 19, 1987
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
Dear Mr. Greenwood:
Enclosed are the laboratory results for the samples submitted to the
Canonie Environmental Analytical Laboratory.
Canonie Environmental Services Cop. -
212 Frank Wen Circle
Suite A
Stockion. California 95206
Phone: 209-983-1340
Unless otherwise instructed by you samples will be returned or disposed of
two weeks from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions please call Jon Bartell or me at (209) 983-1340.
Very truly yours.
~anhydr of- Laboratory Services
Enclosure
I

Laboratory Report for
Mr. Rich Greenwood
Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant Street. Suite 260
San Mateo, CA 94402
November 19, 1987
Canonie Environmental
212 Frank West Circle, Suite A
Stockton, CA 95206
(209) 983-1 340

Client ID: BAY AREA DRUM
Sample ID: 87-035-03-3086
Matrix : SOIL SAMPLE: VCS2
COMPOUND NAME
.......................
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
L CHLOROMETHANE
-
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1,l-DICHLOROETHENE
1,l-DICHLOROETHANE
TOTAL 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
BROMOFORM
- 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE
2-PROPANONE (ACETONE)
GC/MS
VOLATILE ANALYSIS
AMOUNT
-----------
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730.
ND
ND
150.
ND
ND
ND
Data File:>9822V
719822
Checked By

L. Water
-
-
So1 1
Reference Methods
Volatile Organic Analysis
1) Eisenberg. Don M.. et al, "Guidel~nes for
Preparation Analysis
Addressing Fuel Leaks", California Regional
Water Qua1 i ty Control Board. San Francisco
Bay Reg~on. Sept. 1985.
- EPA 601
-. EVA 602
- EPA 624
- EPA 5030 - EPA 8010
- EPA 8015
EPA 8020
.* EPA 8240
Project # 87-035-03-3086
Date Completed 11-19-1987
- Guidelines for
Addressing
Fuel Leaks 1

-
:tiv~ty.,. ... . b Enf 0 SUIV SiIeMit o ~ermltting _a A I Tech ~
O!hrr
10. SAMPLING LOCATION
11. SAMPLES
- -
12. ANALYSIS REQUESTED I. PC8
Container I
k. q Ext. Orp
(Scroeng)
e. 0 pH g. c VOA I. ~Cnlorinrtrd
Pect~c~drr
JM~tal
Scan h. 0 PAH
m. ~Organo-P
PestIclde8
d. a W.E.T.
4
I. 0 Phenols n, Cl
I. ucarba-
- ~ L ~ O S 0.0
13. CHAIN OF CUSTODY I
4. SPECIAL REMARKS j
7 ANALYSIS REQUESTED
.
-
L I
A I
B I
, ,

ww QCliEPT
. .- 02-19-** . - - -
FRI 05:33:36 G 3 ** ****
. .
NO. 85

L
-
LABORATORY REPORT FOR TOTAL METAL ANALYSIS
COLLECTOR'S NAHE: C DAVENPORT COLLECTOR'S SAMPLE NO. : RY-1R
WlPLE LOCATION : BRY AREA DRUM H Y BITER ACTIVITY :
8FO DATE RECEIVED :
ANALYTICAL SAMPLES ARE DIOESTED WITH CONCENfRdTED NITRIC ACID OVER A HOT
PROCEDURE : PCdTE. THE DIGEBTED BAHPLEB ARE FILTERED AND MADE TO 100 ML
WITH 5% NITRIC ACID IN DISTILLED DEIONIZED WATER. RETAL ANALYSIS
OF THE DIOEBT IS BY ICPREB. RESULTS ARE REPORTED R8 UOIGRRH,
HUL NUUBER : Dl047 Dl048
COLLECT SAHP #: RW-LA RY-10
SAMPLE TYPE : LIQUID LIPUlD
AG-S ILVE R
WRSENIC
BA-BARIUFI
BE-BERYLLIUH
CD-CADMIUH
CO-COBALT
CR-CHROUIUFl
CU-COPPER
flO-MOLYBDENUH
N1-NICKEL
Pa-LEAD
SO-ANTfUONY
BE-SELENIUM
V -VANADIUM
ZN-ZINC
TL-THflLLIUH
-
NOTE: < BELOW DETECTION LIMIT OF INBTRUMENT (***).NOT DETERMINED BY ICP
- :
.. 02-19-** FRI 05:31:14 G3
: hx .
3%:
Y* **** N0.03

STAT5 OF CAiiiD2i::i-iiEiilK ASC VIE::AEE AGENCY GEORGE DE~l~EjiiN, Gor?.nar
--
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
2151 GEiKE:F\ r' : i
JAN74 198F /--a?!
'CKELEY. CA PI704
Tommy Lee
SF Dept. of Public Works
750 Phelps Street
SF, CA 94124
Dear Tommy,
January 13, 1987
As per our phone conversation yesterday, I am forwarding to you
our laboratory analysis of the rainwater that has pnded inside
the Bay Area Drum building. The cyanide analysis is enclosed, and
the metals analyses have already been sent to you. The cyanide
analysis was delayed dua to internal prioritization at the
laboratory.
As we agreed, I have informed Kurt Ahlich of Canonie
Environmental that he can take the necessary steps to transfer
this water to the sewer. He will contact you to arrange a
convenient time for both you and him to initiate the discharge.
-
Thanks again for your cooperation in assisting DHS in their
cleanup efforts at the Site. If you have any questions, please
contact me at (415) 540-3401.
4
cc: u ~ Ahlich, t Canonie
Herome ~arcotte, DHS
Cordially
~lif#on W. ~avendort
Associate Engineering Geologist
Site Mitigation Unit

. site BOLL A\- -? c fipk? 1'.2
. . c'
- c. .As'dress 13 \I
a. EPk ID W3.
6. INDEX
>\c&z . S.F (.&
ii.73~: Sirecl Cily Zip . .
-
i... 3 Ex:. 0:g
72. A~\'.~LYs:s EC:.ISTED 1. n PCB (sc;;t"g)

Cate Received
lector's ::me c/;/'hm II&UP~,D"~P by Laboratory /2//// 87
San?plin,- Location R&, q.-c, A!. fd =?;re
J Collector's Sarcple !,Qwl(d to
Reference: MNL Hg - /A oob
ANALYSIS RiSULTS: . . . .
. .. . . .
. .. . . . .
Analyst ' s Sienatures: ..
7 . /I cL 22
I , ..Ll!zU' date
2.
M CRLY.)
'date
California Department of Health Services - Hazardous Materials Laborntory
-
.

APPENDIX D
Environmental

James M. Cramer
VICE PRESIDENT
/
IILEX USA INC.
:alltornla Branch PO 80x 24397 Venlura CA 93002
ax 1805) 642.0777
NlLEX
February 13, 1958
Canonie Environmental
1E25 S. Grant Ave. Suite 2LO
San Mateo, CA.
944ii2
Attention: Mike Klein
RE: BAY AREA DRUM, 60 MIL HDPE CAPlGEDTETFILE
NlLEX USA INC;
Csllfornla Branch
PO Box 24397
Ventura. CA 93002
Phone (805) 654-0610
Fax (8051 642-0777
As per your request we are providing you with the required
submittals far the above project.
It is our recommendation that the gectextiie not be
connected to the structure as it will interfere with the
sealing of the membrane at the concrete interface. ; n e
geotextile shall be terminated within six inches 16'! frcm
the edge of the liner.
All seams fc~r the geotextile shall be overlapped 2' ta
ensure proper continuity a+ the fabric.
4 miii certificate or certifiration that ths geotextile
meets ail of the enclosed specifications shall be forwarded
tn the owner as soon as possible.
Tie fabric shall be shi~ped in black poiyethylene wrapping
te ensure protection frnm U.V. The material shall be
unloaded and handled with rare to ensure the original state
of the fabric.
I trust the above submittal will meet with your approval
should you have any comments or questions please cali me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
NILEX USA INC.
James M Cramer
Vice President
I" canada: NILEX GEOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS INC. ~dmonton, AB ana ~urnaby. BC
-.

Canonie Environmental
1825 S. Grant fivr. Suite P60
San Wateo, CQ.
94 40;'
RE: HUNTERS POINT 60 MIL HDPE CAP--SUBMITT0LS
NlLEX USA INC.
calnmla Bmnch
PO Box 24397
Ventura. CA 93002
Phone (805) 654-0610
Fax (805) 642-0777
As per your recluest we are providing you with the required
submittals for thp above project.
1.5 HDPE Lininq
1.5.1 Item C.
Schleqel Lining Technology ~ 1.11 warrant the material for a
period of two (2) year5 from date of installation. Nilex
US0 Inr. will warrant the installation of the material for a
period of two (2) years from the date of installation.
1.6. Item 0.
The HDPE sheet shall be laid out as per the Nilex field
representative's direction. Prior to any fipld welding
commencing a test weld of 3 feet shall be performed to
ensure the welder- is set to the present ambient outdoor
c~nditions. These welds will be tested for tensile and peel
values by the Nilex technician. Pending the Nil€*x
technicians approval the welding will start. Sheet that can
not be seamed will not be la~d out that day. Rs the sheet
is laid out at the penetrations for the fer~ce a
prefabricated boot shall be installed over the fence post
and welded to the parent sheet material. A compression
fitted band will be installed as per enclosed detail. Upon
completion of the installation of the membrane the Nilex
technician shall visually inspect the entire site and all
seams for any holes or defects. Upon the approval of the
Nilex technician backfilling of the membrane w ~ll commence.
Nilex certifies that all field seams performed in the above
contract will meet the enclosed General Specifications For
HDPE Lining. Any samples requiring verification by an
independent laboratory will be at the owners expense.
In CM.d.: HIW QEOTECHNICALPROWCTS INC. E m ,
*B am BuW, sC

1.5.1 Item R
It is o:Jr 1-rv:oamendat~on that the r:t.otext;le not be
corinected to the structirre as it will ~nterfere WI th t.hc!
seal lnq OF tl;e menhi-ane at the co~lcretr. interf-?ace. The
qrwt~xtile shall be tcrmlnated within six inches (6") fr-on:
the ~dqe of the 1 ~ ner
.
All se.tms for the geolextile %hall be overlapped 2' to
ensure proprr cant~nu: ty of the fabi-IC.
R m i l l certificate or certlflcatlon that the geotextlle
meets all of the enclosed specif~cations shall be forwarded
to the owner as soon as possibl~.
Ihe fabr~c shall he shlpped in ti lack polyethylene wrappinq
to ensure protection from L1.V. The material shall be
unloaded and handled with care to ensure the criginal state
of the fabric.
I trust the above submittal will meet with your approval
should you have any comments or questions please call me at
your convenlencc.
Sincerely,
James M Cramer
Vice President

a NlLEX
USA INC.
P 0 BOX 24397
VENTURA. CA 93002
PHONE (805) 654-0610
N'iEX FAX. ,805) 642.0777

~ - ,-
. . . ... I . ~Z3ELsALLREnSJ~E?4EXTS
A. Ssgae
GENERAL S1ECIIICYUONS FOR HDPE LINING
The work covers the manufacture and installation of a
high den'sity polyet-hylene (SCELEGEL~ sheet) liner for
the lining of earthen basins for the protection of
groundwater.
i
The work includes furnishing all equipment and
materials, providing all labor, supervision,
administration and managenest; and supplying ail
construction equipment, materials and services
necessary to perfora the work as detailed in this
specification.
The lining contractor's asproved drawings for
construction will specify all components and details
require? to meat specifications. The responsibility
of the owner or the lining contractor will be clearly
indicated.

-
9 d ~
.~~
~~ ~.
.The manufacturer/installer must have at least five ( 5)
years continuous ex2erience in the manufactnre and
installation of SCSLEGZL~ sheet, and must have
- . . . . . . -. -. manufactured and installed at least 20,000,000 square
feet of the material specified for this project.
The manufacturer/installer shall submit a list of ten
(10) similar installations which have besn in service
at least two (2) yebrs. .The list shall include the
owner's name, location of project, square feet of
product installed, ahd the completion date.
.Submittals not including this.required information
will not be acce?ted.
Submit for approval samples of SCELEGZL~ sheet
for customer reviev 2nd testing. Testing shall
include compatibility analysis by material
supplier or owner.
Submit for approval as soon as practical after
award of the contract, six (6) sets of full and

complete shop and installation drawings showinq a
minimum of:
a. Layout of the liner systen.
.b. .Details of jointing, liner system, liner
anchorages to concrete structures, details
of sealing the SCHLZGZLO sheet to concrete
structures, and any other openings into the
structure.
Certificates of compliance with the requirezests
of standards and testing methods specified herein
shall be submitred prior to delivery. .The liner
material manufacturer must satisfy by affidavit
to the owner and contractor, jointly, that the
material he offers to furnish and install will
meet in every aspect the requirenents set forth
in the specifications. .The contractoc shall
transmit to the owner the affidavit given him by
the manufacturer or supplier prior to apgroval
for the furnishing and installing of any such
material.

The contractor shall submit a schedule detailing
the liner fabrication and installation,
1. .&1i-vo=,v
.Materials shall be delivered to the site after
the required submittals have been ap~roved.
Storage and handling of the materials shall
conform to the manufacturerls recarmendations and
shall be done in such a manner as to prevent
dainage to any part of the work.
Reference Standards shall comply with the apglicable
. . . - . . .
- - - - ---provisions and recommendations of the American Society
for Testing Materials (AST:4), exce~t as othervise
shown or specified.

F. Job Conddfl~ns
Prior to installation of the liner, contractor shall
verify conditions of existing facilities and
structures to ensure an adequate subgrade for the
liner, as specified in Section 1II.B of this docmeat.
Destructive and non-destructive testing are carried
.out by trained personnel of the lining contractor.
.Quality cantrol procedures are specified in Section IV
of this document.
Terns and conditions of the wtrranty to be agreed uFcn
between the owner and the lining cont:ackor.
The lining shall be a high density polyethylene
(SCSLEGZL9 sheet] containing no additives, fillers or
extenders. Carbon black 23 2 .51 shall be added to

___--_ ..-._L__..._.-.._.-~I_.- -- -- -- ---tke
resin for ultraviolet resisk~nce. The lining sy~==~ sh211
be manuftctured, furnished and installed by a single
contractor. Typical physical progerties of the DPE: liner
(SC~LEGZL~ sheet) are described in Table 1.
Resin use? for extrusion joining shests and shest to
pipe shall be WPS produced from the same resin es the
sheet. .Physical properties shall be the same as tkose
of the resin &ed in the manufacture of the HDPE
liner. The resin shall be sucolied in black.
Sponge rubber sheeting shall be type SCS-41,
Neoprene/EPT/SaR, Closed Cell Medium, 114 inch thick,
one side adhesive.
PYTHON, neoprene adhesive shall be use? for gluing
sponge rubber shesting to concrete and EDPE surfac=s.
Batten strips shall be No. 12 gauge steel type A-36.
Width of strips shall be two inches (2") minimum.

- 7
.. ~
- -
- -
Product and manufacturez: provide alloy steel
fasteners as manufactured by the following:
1. -2 -Molly .Parabolts by US?{ Corporation
2. Kwik-Bolt Eilti Corporation
3 .Ramset, Inc.
.4. Or Ap~roved Equal
.Wet or dry elastic roof sealer as manufactured by
Bonsey Products, Inc.
The lining contractor shall be res~onsible for
inspection of the sheet rolls at the job site. Should
rolls show damage from transit, they will be so
identified by the lining contractor and set aside.
During unrolling of the lining material, the lining
contractor will carry out visual inspection of tbe

sheet surface. Any faulty areas shall be marked and rezaire; - ir.
an approved mznner by the lining contractor.
. B . B1f:2-S~bazzd5-E~_e2az3f i-01)
The Purchaser shall be responsible for presaring the
earthwork as required. .No broken stones or hard
objects shall be present on the surface to be lined.
Stones larger than t-do inches (2") in diameter, shaq
.edged stones of any size, and hard objects shall not
be persitted within four inches (4") of the surface to
be line?. The surface shall be compacted to a density
to allow tbe movenest of vehicles and weldina
equipment on it without causing rutting or other
deleterious effects. .Typically, this is a density of
.85-90 Standard Proctor.
The surface of all concrete bonding surfaces shall be
cleaned and smoothed prior to anchoring the liner.
The SCSLEG2L9 sheet shall be laid out and
installed by manufact=reras trained technicians
in ac=ordance with the applicable approved shop
drawings.

-
6 ~ ~ .
- ' - - . - . The sheets shall be placed in the basin to persit
termination at the top of the side slopes and
adjacent to concrete structures and pipe conduits
as shown on the drawings. The layout shall be
'
- - - -- - - .
. - . . . . .
. . . - - -
.
designed to minimize the number and length of the
field joints, consistent with proper methods of
liner installation.
.Field joints shall be made by overlapping
adjacent sheets a minimum of eight inches
- (8") and extruding a ribbon of extrusion
joining resin no less than 1.5 inches (1.5")
in width between the overlapped sheets or
over the seam beheen the sheets where hand
welds are required,
Prior to extrusion welding of the seams, all
.areas whicb are to become seam intezfaces
shall be cleaned of dust and dirt. The
slick surfaces of the HDPE sheet which are
to become Sean interfaces shall be rougherbed
with a wire brush or other acceptable means
before extrudate is placed between the
overlapping sheets or over a lapped sean.

Exkrusion joining shall not take place
unless the sheet is dry and shall not take
place unless the ambient tenperature is
above 20 " F and below 90" F.
Joints betveen the lining sheets shall be
field welded using the manufacturer's
extrusion joining equipment and techniques.
The joining procedure shall consist of
softening the liner material by heated air.
.The teqerature of the air impinging on the
sheet for this purpose shall range from
420 .F to 680' .F. The exact tenperature
used shall be determined by the installation
supervisor. Directly following the
application of heat, a one inch (1") minims
width strip of the same high density
polyethylene resin from which the sheet is
made shall be extruded betxeen the
overlapped sheets. The temperature of the
resin as it emerges from the extrusion die
shall range from 428" F to 536' F. The
overlapped sheets are then pressed together
to form the extrusion joint.

Penetrations through the liner for pige
flashings, patches, etc., shall be field
welded using an extrusion hand welder. The
joining procedure shall consist of softening
...- - - - . the liner material by heated air as
*
described above. Directly following the
agplication of heat, a hot strip of the saze
material from which the sheet is made will
be extruded over the joint to produce the
extruded joint.
Any required repair of mall holes in the
liner surface shall be made with the
extrusion hand welder. Liner material shall
be cleaned of all dirt, dust, and othez
. foreign material, all smooth SCBLEGZLO sheet
surfaces roughened, air heated to the
prescribed temperature, and a strip of BDPE
resin extruded over the hole to produce an
extrusion weld repair.
- - . . . - - . - - . . - - . - . Seals around penetrations shall be made as
described below.

All pipe pesetrations shall be sleeve? with
DPE pipe. Each EDPE pipe sleeve shall be
sealed to the liquid carrying pipe to
prevent leakage. The basin liner shall be
. . .- -.-anchored to a concrete collar surrounding
the pefietration. A SCSLEGEL~ sheet apron
shall be extrusion welded to the pipe sleeve
and shall be extrusion welded to the base
sheet outside of the area where the base
sheet is anchored to the concrete collar.
The manufacturer of the HDPE resin used in sheet
production tests eacfi batch before delivery to ensure
a maximum consistency of raw material quality.
The following tests shall be carried out by the
.. . - pcoducer of the raw material on each batch and the
results forwarded to the sheet fabricator:
The density of the material reflects the degree
of czystallinity, and thus serves as an indirect

check on mechanical qualities such as hardness,
stiffness and tensile strength.
- .Carbon black polyethylene serves primarily as
protection against thernal aging and harmful
ultraviolet radiation present in outdoor
weathezing. Thus, quality control of the carbon
black content ensures t5e good westhering
properties of polyethylene.
A material's melt index is a measure of its mezn
molecglar weight and rheological properties.
Thus, holding the melt index of the base material
within a narrow ranse is a criterion for uniforz
and optimum HDPZ liner production.
Bell testing is a relatively fast method of
testing a material's performance under mechanical
stressing in aggressive media.

Maintaining a constant moisture content in the
base material is necessary for processing,
resulting in a pore-free, bubble-free product.
.Employing only material with a moisture content
in a narrow tolerance range is another
requirenent for consistent product quality.
The data determined is evaluated by the manufacturer
and, if deviating from the agreed tolerance ranges,
the tested batch is not delivered. As a 'result of
this testing, the manufacturer is guaranteed
consistent base material quality, essential in the
light of the denanding conditions prevailing in the
various apolications of WPE liners.
The incoming raw material shall be sampled and tested
in the lab facilities of the sheet manufacture;.
Properties relative to processing shall be deternined,
specifically:
- Melt Index per ASTX Designation D-1238-73
- Density per ASTM Designation D-792
- Moisture Content per AST:I Designation D-570-63

This testing provides further verification of
consistent product quality, supplementary to the
manufacturer's certificate.
If the test results are positive, a sample of the
. -. - --.-.---batch is processed in manufacturing and evaluated as
- - to melting behavior, forming behavior, and the product
sheet's visual appearance.
No batch is sent into production before positive
results are obtained for the incoming base material
and the tesk processing. If negative results are
obtained, the batch is excluded from processing and
return& to the manufacturer.
All properties determined in these tests shall be
compiled in the final shest certificate.
Automatic control must be included in the extrusion
process and the successive processing stages.
Important parameters in all stages of processing shall
be controlled by automatic control systems.
Three different qualities of the sheet shall be
inspected continuously during production:

.- -
- Forming Process
- Surface Apcearanco
- Sheet Thickness
-- - Processing parameters such as tezperature, pressure
-- - and speed shall be continuously monitored for each
liner produced. A measuring device, such as a strip
chart recorder, shall be furnished, if requested.
.Sheet thickness shall fall within the following
parameters: Ninety percent (90%) of the gross sheet
area shall be ,+ ten percent (2103) of nominal
specified thickness. .Ten percent (103) of the gross
sheet area shall be ,+ fifteen percent (215%) of
nominal specified thickness.
At least three random samples shall be taken from each
sheet roll and forwarded to the laboratory for
.- . .extensive testing. The sample sites shall be e~enly
distributed to ensure a regresentative evaluation of
the overall . quality.
The following tests shall be carried out for each
sheet:

-
-
. . - . - - . . - . .. "
- Tensile Testing per ASTX Designation D-638
-- Impact Tensile Testing per ASTX Designation D-1822
- Thickness
- Stress Cracking Resistance (Bell Test) per
ASTX
Designation D-1693-70.
The following supglenentary tests shall be carried out
for sheet samples from each raw material batch:
- Melt Index per ASTX Designation D-1238-72
- Thermal Shrinkage per ASTM Designation D-1204
- Density per ASm Designation 0-792
Records of this testing shall be a permanent
surveillance of the production process and constant
product quality, and shall be maintained by the
manufacturer.
... . . -- Narrow tolerance ranges ensure high quality in
production. Products deviating from these ranges
shall be renoved and the cause determined.
Sheet installation work shall be carried out under
painstaking supervision up to, and including, project
completion.

The quality control shall be carried out by the
on-site personnel as well as outside testing
institutions.
Quality control of installation shall be divided into
three areas:
Checking the sheets delivered to the site for
transport damages; checking of sheet
identification number with number on certificzte.
Inspection and continuous control of all welding
process parameters.
Testing of the completed weld seams.
.on-site welding of the SCHLEGEL' sheet shall be
carried out by an e:rtrusion welding process. This
.-....p rocess shall guarantee consistent weld seam quality
within a wide range of ambient conditions. The
.control systea of the welding machines shall be
- .- e:ctensively automated .to enable monitoring of the
welding process by the operating personnel.
The welds shall be performed in one procedure by means
of an automatic welding machine, which preheats the
welding surfaces to the desired temperature, injects a
ribbon of molten HDPE material and then applies
contact pressure to the Sean.
1

The procedure for fillet welds shall be similar in
.that the welding area shall be preheated and the
welded material shall be molten WPE. The necessary
contact pressure shall come from the weight of the
hand welding unit itself. Fillet welds shall be used
only for resair .work and special designs.
.Test welds shall be run preceding all extensive
welding to assure good weld quality under the
prevailing site conditions; these weld samples shall
be subsequently subjected to mechanical testing.
The main prereqiisite for good bonding shall be
continuous monitoring of the welding process
parameters, such as hot air tenperature, welding
speed and contact pressure. This is best carried
out by specially trained personnel. Visual
inspection of the welding surfaces, the welding
process and the completed weld by experienced
- -. . . plastic welc?ezs, allows a reliable evaluation of
seam quality.

Production of a quality welding sezm starts with
G - - -.- - a preliminary test weld. The machine settings,
-
---. - pretreatment of the weld surfaces and adjustaent
to environmental effects shall be tested on a
sample welding sesm. A hand operable tensile
testing macbine shall be on site for confirmation
of the joint's tensile strength using strip
samples.
.After installation, two major types of quality
,control shall be available for testing the seas:
- Destructive material tests of weld samples
(spot cbeck)
- Non-Destructive material tests of all welding
seams.
Txo samples shall be taken daily for
Destructive tests on all weld seams;