03.06.2013 Views

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1992 the Ox<strong>for</strong>d historian Lintott published an<br />

entire book that turns out to be based on an<br />

incorrect arrangement of the surviving pieces of<br />

bronze. Four years later the puzzle was finally<br />

solved by Craw<strong>for</strong>d, the principal discovery being<br />

that the two largest fragments are separated by a<br />

lacuna of no more than ca. 35 characters. The<br />

practical significance of this is that it now seems<br />

possible to arrive at a completely new<br />

interpretation of this crucially important text<br />

which not only summarizes all measures taken<br />

between 133 and 111 BC but also provides a<br />

fascinating overview of the economic functions<br />

and legal status of what remained of the <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

ager publicus in 111 BC. Given the length of this<br />

complicated text, to which Lintott devoted several<br />

years of study, the task of elucidating its contents<br />

is a mini-project of its own.<br />

Romans, Latins and Allies: Demographic<br />

and Military Aspects. (This post-doctoral<br />

project was finalized in 2007).<br />

Any inquiry into the changing size of the Roman<br />

citizenry must pay special attention to the relationship<br />

between Romans, Latins and allies. At<br />

least originally, any Latin who migrated to Roman<br />

territory (mostly the city of Rome) automatically<br />

obtained Roman citizenship. Migrating Latins thus<br />

contributed to the growth of the body of citizens.<br />

On the other hand, between 200 and 170 BC large<br />

numbers of Romans became Latins as they were<br />

sent out to newly founded coloniae Latinae.<br />

Although this two-way exchange of Romans and<br />

Latins is of vital importance <strong>for</strong> our understanding<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>History</strong><br />

19<br />

of the demographic make-up of 2nd-century BC<br />

Italy, it is a topic to which very few studies have<br />

been devoted. At the same time there is evidence<br />

to suggest that the second century BC was a<br />

period of rapid demographic growth <strong>for</strong> both<br />

Roman and Latins, who seem to have expanded at<br />

the expense of other Italian groups, such as the<br />

Gauls of North Italy. The implications of this<br />

development <strong>for</strong> the vexed issue of how Italy was<br />

romanized (or latinized) have never been explored.<br />

Finally, it would seem that as the second<br />

century proceeded, the Latins and the other Italian<br />

allies had to shoulder an increasing share of the<br />

military burden of imperial expansion. If this shift<br />

was out of line with the patterns of population<br />

growth in various parts of Italy – as would seem to<br />

have been the case – it becomes easier to<br />

understand why the question of Roman<br />

citizenship acquired a prominent place on the<br />

political agenda from the mid-120s BC onwards.<br />

Of course the same hypothesis helps to explain the<br />

outbreak of the Social War (91-88 BC) as a result of<br />

which Roman citizenship was extended to the<br />

entire free population of Central and South Italy.<br />

Moving Romans. Urbanisation, migration<br />

and labour in the Roman Principate<br />

Rens Tacoma<br />

The aim of the Moving Romans project is to study<br />

the relationship between urbanisation, migration<br />

and labour opportunities in Roman Italy in the<br />

first two centuries A.D. The central question is to<br />

what extent labour-induced migration was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!