03.06.2013 Views

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

Institute for History Annual Report 2010 - O - Universiteit Leiden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Dynamics of<br />

European Identity, 1300-<br />

1700<br />

Description<br />

As the recent wave of concern about national and<br />

cultural identity demonstrates, the question of<br />

how, and with whom, people identify is of continuing<br />

political and social importance. This was<br />

also the case in pre-Modern Europe. Although the<br />

power of the state steadily increased between 1300<br />

and 1700, rulers and administrators remained very<br />

much dependent on good relations with their<br />

subjects, or at least with the local elites. Since these<br />

often identified themselves primarily with the<br />

local community, the region, or other group<br />

interests, the creation of panoptic loyalties was<br />

problematic. This was certainly true in new states.<br />

For this reason, rulers such as the Dukes of<br />

Burgundy consciously concentrated on creating a<br />

supra-territorial elite. Any wise administrator<br />

would expend considerable energy on his<br />

patronage networks. Old media, such as ballads,<br />

pageants and spectacles were used to deliver political<br />

messages, and additional new media were<br />

constantly appearing. Pamphlets and newspapers<br />

created a ‘public sphere’, in which new identities<br />

could be propagated. The development of a sense<br />

of ‘fatherland’ in the highly fragmented Republic<br />

of the Netherlands is an excellent example of this<br />

process.<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>History</strong><br />

21<br />

Yet, state borders were most certainly not the most<br />

important determinant of identity. On the one<br />

hand regions continued to compete with one<br />

another, while, conversely, transnational networks<br />

often proved to be surprisingly resistant to political<br />

division. Even while their rulers were at war,<br />

trade networks continued to unite the Spanish,<br />

Flemish and Dutch trading communities . Cultural<br />

networks also transcended national borders.<br />

Throughout this period, a recognizably European<br />

intellectual culture prevailed, which played an essential<br />

role in the fast transfer of knowledge. Until<br />

1520, the whole of Europe shared one dominant<br />

religious culture. The schism in the Church in the<br />

sixteenth century not only created trans-national<br />

interest groups and refugee flows, it also created<br />

new confessional alliances in international politics.<br />

There are few areas in Europe in which the<br />

dynamics of identity between 1300 and 1700<br />

manifested itself as clearly as in the Low Countries.<br />

Having started out as a loose conglomeration<br />

of semi-autonomous principalities, personal<br />

unions led to the emergence of a fledgling unitary<br />

state until a Revolt against princely authority led<br />

to the creation of two separate states with their<br />

own clear identity, each of which was related<br />

through its dominant religion to confessional<br />

friends elsewhere in Europe. In this world of<br />

constantly changing borders, strong local political<br />

traditions, an important trading culture and the<br />

interdependence of international markets,<br />

‘identity’ was never monolithic. Yet elsewhere in<br />

Europe too, in particular in the great ‘composite<br />

monarchies’ ruled by the Habsburgs, the relation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!