EIOPA Work Programme 2013 - EIOPA - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Deliverables RTS on the allocation of credit assessments to a scale of credit quality steps RTS on the conditions for categorisation of regional governments and local authorities to be treated as exposures to central government RTS on the detailed criteria for the fixed income securities index RTS on the capital requirement for counterparty default risk in the case of exposures to authorised central counterparties RTS on the criteria for the national legislative measures and methodologogy for health risk equalisation systems ITS procedures to be followed and formats and templates for the updating of correlation parameters RTS on the quantitative limits and asset eligibility criteria for risks that are not Priority Resources 4 Objective Origin of request TBD 0.25 FTE those assessments. Article 111 SII Directive. Provide criteria for the mapping of external credit assessments to a scale of credit quality steps. Article 111 SII Directive. TBD 0.25 FTE Conditions for a categorisation of regional governments and local authorities. Article 109a SII Directive TBD 0.25 FTE Provide the basis for calculating the symmetric adjustment to the equity capital charge. Article 109a SII Directive TBD 0.25 FTE Provide the basis for calculating the counterparty default risk charge where the counterparty is an authorised central counterparty. Article 111 SII Directive TBD 0.25 FTE Provide criteria for the national legislative measures and the methodology for the calculation of standard deviations for health risk equalisation systems in the calculation of the health risk charge. Article 111 SII Directive. TBD 0.25 FTE Provide a process for the updating of correlation parameters. Article 111 SII Directive. TBD 0.25 FTE Provide a basis for the convergent calculation of capital 34/65 Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (ECON report March 2012) © <strong>EIOPA</strong> 2012
Deliverables Priority Resources 4 Objective Origin of request adequately covered by a sub module requirements where the risks are not covered in the standard formula. ITS on the exchange of information in colleges RTS on supervisory transparency and accountability 35/65 Article 111 SII Directive H 0.25 FTE Provide basis for convergent procedures for the submission of information to the group supervisor, exchange of information between supervisors and cooperation. Article 249 SII Directive. M 0.25 FTE Provide a basis for improving the consistency and comparability of supervisory information on insurance and reinsurance undertakings and to increase the level of disclosure of the supervisory framework across Member States by providing the structure and formats of the disclosures. Article 31 SII Directive. RTS and ITS on reporting and disclosure H 0.25 FTE Quantitative reporting templates as well as procedures to be followed and formats. Article 35 and 56 SII Directive. ITS on valuation H 0.25 FTE Determination of consistency of IFRS with SII valuation principles. Provide valuation methods where quoted market prices are not available or not consistent. Define alternative valuation methods where IFRS are temporarily or permanently Omnibus II Directive (European Commission proposal January 2011, ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (European Commission proposal January 2011, ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (European Commission proposal January 2011, ECON report March 2012) Omnibus II Directive (European Commission proposal January 2011, ECON report March 2012) © <strong>EIOPA</strong> 2012
Page 1 and 2: EIOPA Work Programme 2013 EIOPA 12/
Page 3 and 4: 8.6 Equivalence 9. EIOPA Internal O
Page 5 and 6: equest of EIOPA, will grow up to 11
Page 7 and 8: • Collect data in EIOPA for furth
Page 9 and 10: • An implementing technical stand
Page 11 and 12: According to EIOPA Regulation, day
Page 13 and 14: 4. Consumer Protection and Financia
Page 15 and 16: 4.2 Financial Innovation In the are
Page 17 and 18: peer review projects which encourag
Page 19 and 20: EIOPA will further develop its data
Page 21 and 22: its Board of Supervisors and to mak
Page 23 and 24: formal consultations of EIOPA work
Page 25 and 26: In 2012, the prioritization in sett
Page 27 and 28: carrying out in accordance with the
Page 29 and 30: In 2012, further steps to develop c
Page 31 and 32: Annex 1: Deliverables for 2013 Deli
Page 33: Deliverables ITS on the equity inde
Page 37 and 38: Deliverables EIOPA when determining
Page 39 and 40: Deliverables Guidelines on calibrat
Page 41 and 42: Deliverables Guidelines on the proc
Page 43 and 44: Deliverables Priority Resources 4 O
Page 45 and 46: Deliverables Guidelines on criteria
Page 47 and 48: Deliverables Priority Resources 4 O
Page 49 and 50: Deliverables on risks in Colleges b
Page 51 and 52: Deliverables account the proposed I
Page 53 and 54: Deliverables and in financial innov
Page 55 and 56: Deliverables Support Policy related
Page 57 and 58: Deliverables to guide discussion. F
Page 59 and 60: Deliverables Network of Agencies 8.
Page 61 and 62: Deliverables Initiate and provide c
Page 63 and 64: Deliverables Reinforcement of legal
Page 65: Deliverables XBRL related projects:

EIOPA Work Programme 2013 - EIOPA - Europa

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?