You're like `why not?' The quotative expressions of Glasgow ...
You're like `why not?' The quotative expressions of Glasgow ...
You're like `why not?' The quotative expressions of Glasgow ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
QUOTATIVES IN GLASGOW 11<br />
Table 5: Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>quotative</strong>s according to person <strong>of</strong> subject the ®gures<br />
in parentheses refer to plural subjects)<br />
<strong>The</strong> skewed distribution <strong>of</strong> forms makes gender comparisons hazardous,<br />
since the girls produce three-quarters <strong>of</strong> the <strong>quotative</strong>s in the sample. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
also the dubious status <strong>of</strong> forms such as be <strong>like</strong> that and go <strong>like</strong> that, since there<br />
is no reference to such <strong>quotative</strong>s elsewhere. It is, however, possible to look at<br />
be <strong>like</strong> alone. <strong>The</strong>re are some interesting social class and gender implications in<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> go and be <strong>like</strong>, as can be seen in Figure 2, which shows the proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> these <strong>quotative</strong>s produced by each group <strong>of</strong> adolescents. It can be seen from<br />
Figure 2 that be <strong>like</strong> without that) is predominantly a middle-class form among<br />
the <strong>Glasgow</strong> adolescents with the middle-class girls using it more than any<br />
other form 56%) and the middle-class boys choosing it 21 percent <strong>of</strong> the time,<br />
though their preferred form is go. <strong>The</strong> working-class girls, who are responsible<br />
for 59 percent <strong>of</strong> all the <strong>quotative</strong>s in the sample, choose be <strong>like</strong> only 11 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the time. All the examples <strong>of</strong> be by itself are given by girls with equal<br />
numbers from the two social class groups, but since the working-class girls<br />
produce three times as many <strong>quotative</strong>s, the proportion <strong>of</strong> be <strong>quotative</strong>s is<br />
higher for the middle-class girls.<br />
# Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001<br />
say go be/go <strong>like</strong> that) be<br />
% N % N % N % N<br />
1st person 34 20 3824 2) 36 23 2) 50 4<br />
2nd person 3 2 2 1 5 3 12 1<br />
3rd person 62 37 2) 60 381) 59 37 4) 38 3<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
be <strong>like</strong> go<br />
Working-class girls<br />
Middle-class girls<br />
Working-class boys<br />
Middle-class boys<br />
Figure 2: Percentage <strong>of</strong> be <strong>like</strong> and go by gender and social class adolescent<br />
sample)