EAU 2013 - Programme Book - YouMed

Monday, 18 March - EAU Programme
Abstract Session
14.00 - 15.30 Surgical approaches for prostate cancer
Brown Hall 1-2 - Level S2
Poster Session 75
Chairs: M. Burchardt, Greifswald (DE)
B. Rocco, Milano (IT)
Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes
in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion. Extended presentations (*) are 4 minutes in length, followed
by 2 minutes for discussion.
* 911 Oncological outcome and prognostic factors for locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radical
prostatectomy: An EMPaCT study
C.Y. Hsu, M. Spahn, A. Briganti, J. Karnes, P. Gontero, G. Marchioro, B. Tombal, J. Chun, P. Bastian, H. Van
Der Poel, R. Sanchez-Salas, S. Joniau (Taichung, Taiwan; Berne, Switzerland; Milan, Turin, Novara, Italy;
Rochester, United States of America; Brussels, Leuven, Belgium; Hamburg, Munich, Germany; Amsterdam,
The Netherlands; Paris, France)
* 912 Comparative oncologic effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: An
analysis of mortality outcomes in 34,515 patients treated with up to 15 years follow-up
P. Sooriakumaran, L. Haendler, T. Nyberg, I. Heus, M. Olsson, S. Carlsson, M. Roobol, P. Wiklund (Stockholm,
Sweden; Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
913 Trifecta and SCP classification after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
M.B. Borghesi, V. Ficarra, G. Novara, E. Frumenzio, M. Gan, A. Mottrie (Aalst, Belgium; Padua, Italy)
914 A prospective randomized study to compare functional outcomes of radiofrequency and ultracision
scalpels in videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy
A.L. Pastore, G. Palleschi, V. Petrozza, L. Silvestri, A. Leto, A. Ripoli, D. Autieri, A. Carbone (Latina, Italy)
915 Robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of outcomes across procedure type and
volume quartile
J.D. Sammon, S. Sukumar, P. Ravi, K.R. Ghani, J.O. Peabody, M. Menon, Q-D. Trinh (Detroit, United States of
America)
916 Impact of length of positive surgical margins (PSM) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robotic-assisted
radical prostatectomy (RARP), in a single center series with a minimum follow-up of five years
A. Ploumidis, P. Sooriakumaran, L. Haendler, T. Nyberg, M. Olsson, S. Carlsson, G. Steineck, P. Wiklund
(Stockholm, Sweden)
917 Comparative analysis of a consecutive series of 160 brachytherapies and 153 robotic prostatectomies
J.M. Conde-Sanchez, C. Garcia-Sanchez, B. Congregado-Ruiz, I. Osman-Garcia, E. Argüelles-Salido,
J.M. Pena-Outeiriño, R.A. Medina-Lopez (Seville, Spain)
918 Is robotic assisted radical prostatectomy the real alternative to active surveillance? Results of perioperative
and functional outcome analyses
A. Gallina, N.M. Passoni, A. Nini, A. Salonia, P. Dell’Oglio, M. Tutolo, D. Di Trapani, R. Colombo, R. Damiano,
N. Finocchio, V. Scattoni, G. Guazzoni, N. Suardi (Milan, Catanzaro, Italy)
919 Increasing cost-effectiveness in DaVinci-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by reducing the utilization of
robotic and laparoscopic instruments and disposables: Experience of two high-volume robotic European
centers
A. Haese, B. Rocco (Hamburg, Germany; Milan, Italy)
EAU Milan 2013
283
Monday