occurrence of degenerative joint disease in the radius: analysis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Side Table 3.15. Distal pitting and distal eburnation Distal Distal Pitting Eburnation Absent Present- Joint Surface Present- Total Ulnar Facet Absent 11 11 Present/ Minimal Moderate/ Severe 237 1 1 239 51 10 3 64 Total 299 11 4 314 x²= 43.1, p≤ .001 (Significant) The results from the Poole-Rose population show no significant statistical relationship between side and any of the variables, with the exception of side and pitting on the proximal radius. The left side of the proximal joint is affected slightly more than the right side in the category for minimal pitting only. See tables 3.16-3.21 for an evaluation of side by joint surface. Table 3.16. Side and pitting on the proximal radius Absent Present/ Moderate/ Total Minimal Severe Left 58 59 26 143 Right 29 79 23 131 Total 114 185 72 371 x²= 14.2, p=.007 (Significant) 43
Table 3.17. Side and pitting on the distal radius Absent Present/ Moderate/ Total Minimal Severe Left 4 111 38 153 Right 7 128 25 160 Total 11 239 63 313 x²= 4.6, p= .103 Table 3.18. Side and lipping on the proximal radius Absent Present/ Moderate/ Total Mininal Severe Left 126 12 4 142 Right 107 20 5 132 Total 233 32 9 274 x²= 3.7, p= .448 Table 3.19. Side and lipping on the distal radius Absent Present/ Moderate/ Total Minimal Severe Left 66 70 15 151 Right 78 66 13 157 Total 144 136 28 308 x²=1.1, p= .564 Table 3.20. Side and eburnation on the proximal radius Absent Present- Present- Total Joint Surface Perimeter Left 139 4 143 Right 128 2 1 131 Total 267 6 1 274 x²= 2.4, p= .658 44
Page 1 and 2: OCCURRENCE OF DEGENERATIVE JOINT DI
Page 3 and 4: University and students a chance to
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF FIGURES 3.1 Proximal radius
Page 9 and 10: of DJD, proximal lipping is less fr
Page 11 and 12: frequent and well-known burial prac
Page 13 and 14: Literature Review The Late Woodland
Page 15 and 16: degenerative joint disease. A gener
Page 17 and 18: diarthrodial joints.” In the huma
Page 19 and 20: minimal pitting. Porosity can be di
Page 21 and 22: Jurmain (1999) points out that “i
Page 23 and 24: there is much to be learned from si
Page 25 and 26: ound, discrete area of erosion on t
Page 27 and 28: Eskimos. DJD was studied on the dis
Page 29 and 30: common in the knee. Skeletal distri
Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS The
Page 33 and 34: pitting can be difficult to assess
Page 35 and 36: Minimum Number of Individuals CHAPT
Page 37 and 38: Table 3.2. Minimum number of adult
Page 39 and 40: of the test. When the degrees of fr
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3.3. Moderate/Severe pitting
Page 43 and 44: Table 3.5. Proximal lipping and dis
Page 45 and 46: Figure 3.5. Moderate/Severe lipping
Page 47 and 48: Table 3.9. Proximal lipping and dis
Page 49 and 50: Figure 3.7. Eburnation of the joint
Page 51: Table 3.13. Proximal pitting and di
Page 55 and 56: the Poole-Rose ossuary sample, DJD
Page 57 and 58: of DJD, a functional or stress rela
Page 59 and 60: This suggests degeneration of the j
Page 61 and 62: the wrist causes increased wear and
Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSIONS The main obje
Page 65 and 66: understanding the diverse etiology
Page 67 and 68: Jurmain RD (1978) Paleoepidemiology
Page 69 and 70: Werner FW, An KN, Palmer AK, and Ch

occurrence of degenerative joint disease in the radius: analysis

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?