27.06.2013 Views

Developing sustainability reporting - Case Cargotec - Aaltodoc

Developing sustainability reporting - Case Cargotec - Aaltodoc

Developing sustainability reporting - Case Cargotec - Aaltodoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SustainAbility (2008) warn that trying to cover everything, reports have tended to become<br />

longer, which can overwhelm readers. Yet the authors note that the lack of an established means<br />

of assessing <strong>sustainability</strong> information is a problem. As a result, reports often provide “too much<br />

information, too little meaning” (p. 29). Due to all of these challenges, the full potential of<br />

corporate responsibility <strong>reporting</strong> has not yet been realised (Sullivan 2011).<br />

2.5. Suggestions for effective <strong>sustainability</strong> <strong>reporting</strong><br />

2.5.1. Elements of effective <strong>sustainability</strong> <strong>reporting</strong><br />

Effective <strong>sustainability</strong> <strong>reporting</strong> quantifies how the company has performed and what it is<br />

currently doing to address stakeholder concerns, while also describing the company’s future<br />

objectives and how it is planning to achieve them (MacLean & Rebernak 2007). Regarding the<br />

elements to be included, <strong>sustainability</strong> <strong>reporting</strong> guidelines often suggest that corporate<br />

responsibility reports should contain a description of the organisation, its <strong>sustainability</strong> vision, its<br />

objectives regarding <strong>sustainability</strong>, and indicators that show the performance of the organisation<br />

(Roca & Searcy 2012). According to Brammer & Pavelin (2008), the quality of corporate<br />

environmental disclosure can be assessed through five indicators: whether disclosure discusses<br />

environmental policies, reports specific actions, quantifies environmental impact, sets formal<br />

targets, and is subject to external audit. Somewhat similarly, PwC (2011) focuses on four<br />

indicators while evaluating Finnish corporate responsibility <strong>reporting</strong>: coverage and balance,<br />

stakeholders, indicators, and independent assurance.<br />

The findings of Vurro & Perrini (2011) indicate that it is import to structure the corporate<br />

responsibility report in a comprehensive way, and extend coverage to various stakeholders and<br />

related issues. According to the authors, <strong>sustainability</strong> <strong>reporting</strong> should mirror the diversity and<br />

complexity that characterise the stakeholders of the company. Thus, it is important to use many<br />

different communication channels besides just one annual report in order to develop<br />

comprehensive corporate responsibility communication strategies that enhance trust and value<br />

for the company within its various stakeholder groups (KPMG 2011). Related to the annual<br />

report, PwC (2011) suggests that integrating <strong>sustainability</strong> issues is another area to be improved;<br />

currently only a couple of Finnish corporations include <strong>sustainability</strong> figures among their annual<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!