29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was presented as a fundamental right <strong>of</strong> women by those involved in the women’s<br />

movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Jex-Blake felt that<br />

medicine should be no exception. She even made the argument that there was<br />

historical evidence in favour <strong>of</strong> the medical education <strong>of</strong> women and that, ‘those<br />

learned in Greek literature will remember that Homer speaks <strong>of</strong> medical women<br />

both in the Iliad and in the Odyssey’ and that Euripides represents the nurse as<br />

reminding Queen Phaedra that if her disease ‘is such as may not be told to men’,<br />

there were skilled women at hand to whom she could turn. 60 Ethel Lamport also<br />

drew attention to Queen Phaedra and other medical women in Greek literature as<br />

well as mentioning figures from the Middle Ages in various European countries who<br />

were successful female doctors. 61 Despite the historical precedence <strong>of</strong> women<br />

healers, opponents <strong>of</strong> women in medicine claimed that women could have a role in<br />

caring for the sick but without becoming doctors. Mater argued:<br />

Let women then be nurses, tenders <strong>of</strong> the sick, free from the very faintest taint<br />

<strong>of</strong> prudery or affectation in anything and everything that comes in their way<br />

when helping and sustaining the sufferings <strong>of</strong> those around them; but let there<br />

be a line beyond which they sink from treading. 62<br />

It may appear to be a paradox that nursing was deemed suitable for women, while<br />

medicine was not, but the answer is that nursing was not seen as a proper career<br />

for a middle class woman at the time. In <strong>Ireland</strong>, aside from that carried out by<br />

nuns, in the late-nineteenth century nursing was undertaken mostly by poor women<br />

without training who carried out their work in return for maintenance within their<br />

institution. 63 Lee Holcombe has argued that in the nineteenth-century, young middle<br />

class ladies in Britain would have been revolted by the idea <strong>of</strong> becoming nurses. 64<br />

Nursing work at the time was considered ‘a particularly repugnant form <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

service for which little or no education and special training were necessary’ and as<br />

60<br />

Jex-Blake, ‘The medical education <strong>of</strong> women’, p.5.<br />

61<br />

Lamport, ‘Medicine as a pr<strong>of</strong>ession for women’, pp.278-86.<br />

62<br />

‘A lady on lady doctors’, p.680.<br />

63<br />

Maria Luddy, Women and philanthropy in nineteenth-century <strong>Ireland</strong>, (Cambridge<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 1995), p.51.<br />

64<br />

Lee Holcombe, Victorian ladies at work: middle-class working women in England and<br />

Wales, 1850-1914, (Connecticut: Archon Books,1973), p.68.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!