30.06.2013 Views

Rigorous Sensor Modeling and Triangulation for OrbView-3 - asprs

Rigorous Sensor Modeling and Triangulation for OrbView-3 - asprs

Rigorous Sensor Modeling and Triangulation for OrbView-3 - asprs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

triangulation can be per<strong>for</strong>med on multiple images <strong>and</strong> sensors using tie points only in the fully weighted least<br />

squares bundle adjustment.<br />

Automatic Point Measurement (APM) provides a mechanism to measure tie points automatically between<br />

overlapping imagery regardless of the image <strong>for</strong>mat or sensor type. APM was per<strong>for</strong>med on the six input images<br />

using a regular grid tie point pattern. The results <strong>for</strong> the tie point distribution <strong>and</strong> number are displayed in Figure 1.<br />

Figure 1. Tie points after SOCET SET APM <strong>and</strong> MST bundle adjustment with blunder detection. The zero ray tie<br />

points were eliminated as part of blunder detection. The maximum number of overlaps from the input imagery is<br />

five. The three five ray points can be seen in the center of the block, which is also the location of the high resolution<br />

orthophoto used to check the absolute accuracy of the block. The check point orthophoto footprint is shown in black.<br />

An important element in the MST fully weighted least squares bundle adjustment is automatic blunder<br />

detection. Enabling this feature detected <strong>and</strong> deleted 42 points from the six image block: these points are depicted in<br />

red in Figure 1. The resultant RMS of the tie points was just under one pixel. It was determined after analysis of the<br />

graphical display of residuals with associated imagery that the long <strong>OrbView</strong>-3 image strips were being constrained<br />

too tightly based on the a priori accuracy estimates <strong>for</strong> the parameters. There<strong>for</strong>e, the accuracy values <strong>for</strong> the<br />

exterior orientation elements <strong>for</strong> the offset <strong>and</strong> linear terms in equations 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 were increased (loosened) to allow<br />

more adjustment <strong>for</strong> these parameters. The resultant RMS <strong>for</strong> pixel space residuals decreased to 0.86 pixels.<br />

Check points were used to determine the absolute accuracy of the six image multi-sensor triangulation. The<br />

check points were derived from a high resolution orthomosaic that was created from digital frame images <strong>and</strong><br />

LIDAR courtesy of Merrick <strong>and</strong> Company. The high resolution orthomosaic has a ground sample distance of 15<br />

centimeters. The check points were manually measured in the satellite imagery. Each check point fell within the<br />

five-image overlap region as shown in Figure 1. Table 2 outlines the horizontal check point differences.<br />

ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference<br />

Reno, Nevada ♦ May 1-5, 2006<br />

Rays Color Tie<br />

Points<br />

0 42<br />

2 102<br />

3 27<br />

4 14<br />

5 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!